英语教育政策中的非法学校排斥

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
M. Whitehouse
{"title":"英语教育政策中的非法学校排斥","authors":"M. Whitehouse","doi":"10.1080/13632752.2022.2092274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article draws upon legislation, policy, guidance and recently published research in order to explore why illegal exclusion, sometimes known as off rolling, is an under-researched area of education, and what the most significant barriers are to gaining a clearer understanding of the scale of, and reasons behind, the practice. In doing so, the article draws attention to policy obfuscation, inconsistent definitions and a desire to ‘name and shame’ offending schools. Furthermore, the contention is that school exclusion policy and safeguarding policy are not aligned, which means that many children, particularly those who are statistically more vulnerable to exclusion are denied their right to both education and to be kept safe from harm. I conclude by arguing that a shift in priorities, away from punishment and towards upholding safeguarding legislation, is required.","PeriodicalId":46308,"journal":{"name":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","volume":"212 1 1","pages":"220 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegal school exclusion in English education policy\",\"authors\":\"M. Whitehouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632752.2022.2092274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article draws upon legislation, policy, guidance and recently published research in order to explore why illegal exclusion, sometimes known as off rolling, is an under-researched area of education, and what the most significant barriers are to gaining a clearer understanding of the scale of, and reasons behind, the practice. In doing so, the article draws attention to policy obfuscation, inconsistent definitions and a desire to ‘name and shame’ offending schools. Furthermore, the contention is that school exclusion policy and safeguarding policy are not aligned, which means that many children, particularly those who are statistically more vulnerable to exclusion are denied their right to both education and to be kept safe from harm. I conclude by arguing that a shift in priorities, away from punishment and towards upholding safeguarding legislation, is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES\",\"volume\":\"212 1 1\",\"pages\":\"220 - 230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2022.2092274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2022.2092274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文借鉴立法、政策、指导和最近发表的研究,以探讨为什么非法排斥(有时被称为off rolling)是一个研究不足的教育领域,以及阻碍我们更清楚地了解这种做法的规模及其背后原因的最大障碍是什么。在这样做的过程中,文章引起了人们对政策混乱、定义不一致以及“点名羞辱”违规学校的愿望的关注。此外,争论的焦点是学校排斥政策和保护政策不一致,这意味着许多儿童,特别是那些在统计上更容易被排斥的儿童,被剥夺了受教育和免受伤害的权利。我的结论是,需要改变优先事项,从惩罚转向维护立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illegal school exclusion in English education policy
ABSTRACT This article draws upon legislation, policy, guidance and recently published research in order to explore why illegal exclusion, sometimes known as off rolling, is an under-researched area of education, and what the most significant barriers are to gaining a clearer understanding of the scale of, and reasons behind, the practice. In doing so, the article draws attention to policy obfuscation, inconsistent definitions and a desire to ‘name and shame’ offending schools. Furthermore, the contention is that school exclusion policy and safeguarding policy are not aligned, which means that many children, particularly those who are statistically more vulnerable to exclusion are denied their right to both education and to be kept safe from harm. I conclude by arguing that a shift in priorities, away from punishment and towards upholding safeguarding legislation, is required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The central intention of Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties (EBDs) is to contribute to readers" understanding of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties, and also their knowledge of appropriate ways of preventing and responding to EBDs, in terms of intervention and policy. The journal aims to cater for a wide audience, in response to the diverse nature of the professionals who work with and for children with EBDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信