对于患有DLD1的儿童,我们在任何语言领域都没有“最佳剂量”的答案

Q2 Social Sciences
Paul J. Yoder
{"title":"对于患有DLD1的儿童,我们在任何语言领域都没有“最佳剂量”的答案","authors":"Paul J. Yoder","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2023.2252245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Q (1) To what degree have the quantitative aspects of dosage (dose [properly administered teaching episodes per session], dose frequency [number of sessions over a given time], and total intervention duration [time frame across which intervention sessions are spread]) been specifically manipulated and compared in intervention studies and how confident can we be in the study findings? (2) What are the optimal quantitative dosage characteristics for phonology, vocabulary, and morphosyntax outcomes? Does optimal dosage differ across these domains?","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"107 1","pages":"155 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We do not have an answer to “optimal dosage” on any language domain for children with DLD1\",\"authors\":\"Paul J. Yoder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17489539.2023.2252245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Q (1) To what degree have the quantitative aspects of dosage (dose [properly administered teaching episodes per session], dose frequency [number of sessions over a given time], and total intervention duration [time frame across which intervention sessions are spread]) been specifically manipulated and compared in intervention studies and how confident can we be in the study findings? (2) What are the optimal quantitative dosage characteristics for phonology, vocabulary, and morphosyntax outcomes? Does optimal dosage differ across these domains?\",\"PeriodicalId\":39977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2023.2252245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2023.2252245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问(1)在干预研究中,剂量的定量方面(剂量[每次适当给予的教学次数]、剂量频率[给定时间内的治疗次数]和总干预持续时间[干预疗程分布的时间框架])在多大程度上被特别操纵和比较?我们对研究结果的信心有多大?(2)语音、词汇和形态句法结果的最佳定量剂量特征是什么?这些区域的最佳剂量不同吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
We do not have an answer to “optimal dosage” on any language domain for children with DLD1
Q (1) To what degree have the quantitative aspects of dosage (dose [properly administered teaching episodes per session], dose frequency [number of sessions over a given time], and total intervention duration [time frame across which intervention sessions are spread]) been specifically manipulated and compared in intervention studies and how confident can we be in the study findings? (2) What are the optimal quantitative dosage characteristics for phonology, vocabulary, and morphosyntax outcomes? Does optimal dosage differ across these domains?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信