瞳孔散瞳变化作为糖尿病的标志

N. C
{"title":"瞳孔散瞳变化作为糖尿病的标志","authors":"N. C","doi":"10.23880/oajo-16000228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical Relevance: Optometrists often are the first to examine previously underdiagnosed diabetic patients because of its ocular manifestations such as a change in refractive status. This study is relevant to help optometrists identify patients with diabetes using changes in pupil mydriasis as a marker. Background: This study compared the pupillary dilatation in subjects with diabetes mellitus and those without diabetes mellitus. The purpose of the study was to use this difference as a diagnostic marker for identification of diabetes in previously undiagnosed subjects who present for eye examination. Methods: An experimental study was conducted involving 40 non-diabetic and 80 diabetic subjects with or without diabetic retinopathy. Baseline pupil diameter was measured using Orbscan and Aberrometer. Mydriasis was elicited using a combination eye drop (0.8% Tropicamide and 5% Phenylephrine). Pupil diameter was measured at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the instillation of the eye drops. The difference in pupil diameter amongst the three groups was determined using factorial ANOVA to account for the effect of age. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean pupil diameter among the three groups at baseline when measured with Orbscan (p=0.187) and Aberrometer (p=0.146). There was a significant difference in the mean and mean change in pupil diameter among the three groups with either Orbscan or Aberrometer at 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the instillation of mydriatic drops. The non-diabetics have larger pupil diameter while the diabetics with retinopathy have the least pupil diameter. Conclusion: The study showed that there was a significant difference in pupil diameter between non-diabetics, diabetics without retinopathy and diabetics with retinopathy during mydriasis. Alongside a history of symptoms of diabetes, this difference could be explored as an ocular biomarker to identify previously undiagnosed diabetes in individuals who present for routine eye examination.","PeriodicalId":91939,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Pupil Mydriasis as a Marker for Diabetes\",\"authors\":\"N. C\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/oajo-16000228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical Relevance: Optometrists often are the first to examine previously underdiagnosed diabetic patients because of its ocular manifestations such as a change in refractive status. This study is relevant to help optometrists identify patients with diabetes using changes in pupil mydriasis as a marker. Background: This study compared the pupillary dilatation in subjects with diabetes mellitus and those without diabetes mellitus. The purpose of the study was to use this difference as a diagnostic marker for identification of diabetes in previously undiagnosed subjects who present for eye examination. Methods: An experimental study was conducted involving 40 non-diabetic and 80 diabetic subjects with or without diabetic retinopathy. Baseline pupil diameter was measured using Orbscan and Aberrometer. Mydriasis was elicited using a combination eye drop (0.8% Tropicamide and 5% Phenylephrine). Pupil diameter was measured at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the instillation of the eye drops. The difference in pupil diameter amongst the three groups was determined using factorial ANOVA to account for the effect of age. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean pupil diameter among the three groups at baseline when measured with Orbscan (p=0.187) and Aberrometer (p=0.146). There was a significant difference in the mean and mean change in pupil diameter among the three groups with either Orbscan or Aberrometer at 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the instillation of mydriatic drops. The non-diabetics have larger pupil diameter while the diabetics with retinopathy have the least pupil diameter. Conclusion: The study showed that there was a significant difference in pupil diameter between non-diabetics, diabetics without retinopathy and diabetics with retinopathy during mydriasis. Alongside a history of symptoms of diabetes, this difference could be explored as an ocular biomarker to identify previously undiagnosed diabetes in individuals who present for routine eye examination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open access journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open access journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajo-16000228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajo-16000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床相关性:由于糖尿病患者的眼部表现如屈光状态的改变,验光师通常是第一个检查未确诊糖尿病患者的人。本研究有助于验光师以瞳孔散瞳的变化作为识别糖尿病患者的标志。背景:本研究比较了糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的瞳孔扩张情况。该研究的目的是利用这种差异作为诊断标记,在以前未确诊的受试者进行眼科检查时识别糖尿病。方法:对40例非糖尿病患者和80例伴有或不伴有糖尿病视网膜病变的糖尿病患者进行实验研究。使用Orbscan和Aberrometer测量基线瞳孔直径。使用联合滴眼液(0.8% Tropicamide和5% Phenylephrine)引起瞳孔。分别于滴眼液后15、30、45和60分钟测量瞳孔直径。三组之间瞳孔直径的差异是用因子方差分析来确定的,以解释年龄的影响。结果:使用Orbscan (p=0.187)和Aberrometer (p=0.146)测量三组患者基线时的平均瞳孔直径差异无统计学意义。在滴注瞳孔滴液后30min、45min和60min,使用Orbscan和Aberrometer的三组患者瞳孔直径的平均值和平均变化差异有统计学意义。非糖尿病患者瞳孔直径较大,合并视网膜病变的糖尿病患者瞳孔直径最小。结论:非糖尿病患者、无视网膜病变的糖尿病患者和有视网膜病变的糖尿病患者在瞳孔散瞳时瞳孔直径有显著差异。除了糖尿病症状史外,这种差异可以作为眼部生物标志物进行探索,以识别进行常规眼科检查的个体先前未确诊的糖尿病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Pupil Mydriasis as a Marker for Diabetes
Clinical Relevance: Optometrists often are the first to examine previously underdiagnosed diabetic patients because of its ocular manifestations such as a change in refractive status. This study is relevant to help optometrists identify patients with diabetes using changes in pupil mydriasis as a marker. Background: This study compared the pupillary dilatation in subjects with diabetes mellitus and those without diabetes mellitus. The purpose of the study was to use this difference as a diagnostic marker for identification of diabetes in previously undiagnosed subjects who present for eye examination. Methods: An experimental study was conducted involving 40 non-diabetic and 80 diabetic subjects with or without diabetic retinopathy. Baseline pupil diameter was measured using Orbscan and Aberrometer. Mydriasis was elicited using a combination eye drop (0.8% Tropicamide and 5% Phenylephrine). Pupil diameter was measured at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the instillation of the eye drops. The difference in pupil diameter amongst the three groups was determined using factorial ANOVA to account for the effect of age. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean pupil diameter among the three groups at baseline when measured with Orbscan (p=0.187) and Aberrometer (p=0.146). There was a significant difference in the mean and mean change in pupil diameter among the three groups with either Orbscan or Aberrometer at 30, 45 and 60 minutes after the instillation of mydriatic drops. The non-diabetics have larger pupil diameter while the diabetics with retinopathy have the least pupil diameter. Conclusion: The study showed that there was a significant difference in pupil diameter between non-diabetics, diabetics without retinopathy and diabetics with retinopathy during mydriasis. Alongside a history of symptoms of diabetes, this difference could be explored as an ocular biomarker to identify previously undiagnosed diabetes in individuals who present for routine eye examination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信