挥发性麻醉剂和1gy或2gy放射治疗对体内肾细胞DNA损伤的影响

V. Benković, N. Oršolić, A. Knežević, N. Borojević, G. Brozović, M. Milić
{"title":"挥发性麻醉剂和1gy或2gy放射治疗对体内肾细胞DNA损伤的影响","authors":"V. Benković, N. Oršolić, A. Knežević, N. Borojević, G. Brozović, M. Milić","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2022-73-3600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Patient immobilisation with volatile anaesthetics (VA) during radiotherapy is sometimes unavoidable. Although it is known that both VAs and ionising radiation can have nephrotoxic effects, there are no studies of their combined effects on DNA damage. The aim of this in vivo study was to address this gap by investigating whether 48 groups of healthy Swiss albino mice (totalling 240) would differ in kidney cell DNA damage response (alkaline comet assay) to isoflurane, sevoflurane, or halothane anaesthesia and exposure to 1 Gy or 2 Gy of ionising radiation. We took kidney cortex samples after 0, 2, 6, and 24 h of exposure and measured comet parameters: tail length and tail intensity. To quantify the efficiency of the cells to repair and re-join DNA strand breaks, we also calculated cellular DNA repair index. Exposure to either VA alone increased DNA damage, which was similar between sevoflurane and isoflurane, and the highest with halothane. In combined exposure (VA and irradiation with 1 Gy) DNA damage remained at similar levels for all time points or was even lower than damage caused by radiation alone. Halothane again demonstrated the highest damage. In combined exposure with irradiation of 2 Gy sevoflurane significantly elevated tail intensity over the first three time points, which decreased and was even lower on hour 24 than in samples exposed to the corresponding radiation dose alone. This study confirmed that volatile anaesthetics are capable of damaging DNA, while combined VA and 1 Gy or 2 Gy treatment did not have a synergistic damaging effect on DNA. Further studies on the mechanisms of action are needed to determine the extent of damage in kidney cells after longer periods of observation and how efficiently the cells can recover from exposure to single and multiple doses of volatile anaesthetics and radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":8292,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"36 1","pages":"62 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kidney Cell DNA Damage Caused By Combined Exposure To Volatile Anaesthetics and 1 Gy Or 2 Gy Radiotherapy Dose in Vivo\",\"authors\":\"V. Benković, N. Oršolić, A. Knežević, N. Borojević, G. Brozović, M. Milić\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aiht-2022-73-3600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Patient immobilisation with volatile anaesthetics (VA) during radiotherapy is sometimes unavoidable. Although it is known that both VAs and ionising radiation can have nephrotoxic effects, there are no studies of their combined effects on DNA damage. The aim of this in vivo study was to address this gap by investigating whether 48 groups of healthy Swiss albino mice (totalling 240) would differ in kidney cell DNA damage response (alkaline comet assay) to isoflurane, sevoflurane, or halothane anaesthesia and exposure to 1 Gy or 2 Gy of ionising radiation. We took kidney cortex samples after 0, 2, 6, and 24 h of exposure and measured comet parameters: tail length and tail intensity. To quantify the efficiency of the cells to repair and re-join DNA strand breaks, we also calculated cellular DNA repair index. Exposure to either VA alone increased DNA damage, which was similar between sevoflurane and isoflurane, and the highest with halothane. In combined exposure (VA and irradiation with 1 Gy) DNA damage remained at similar levels for all time points or was even lower than damage caused by radiation alone. Halothane again demonstrated the highest damage. In combined exposure with irradiation of 2 Gy sevoflurane significantly elevated tail intensity over the first three time points, which decreased and was even lower on hour 24 than in samples exposed to the corresponding radiation dose alone. This study confirmed that volatile anaesthetics are capable of damaging DNA, while combined VA and 1 Gy or 2 Gy treatment did not have a synergistic damaging effect on DNA. Further studies on the mechanisms of action are needed to determine the extent of damage in kidney cells after longer periods of observation and how efficiently the cells can recover from exposure to single and multiple doses of volatile anaesthetics and radiotherapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"62 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2022-73-3600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2022-73-3600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在放射治疗期间,患者使用挥发性麻醉剂(VA)进行固定有时是不可避免的。虽然已知VAs和电离辐射都有肾毒性作用,但没有关于它们对DNA损伤的联合作用的研究。这项体内研究的目的是通过调查48组健康瑞士白化小鼠(总共240只)在异氟烷、七氟烷或氟烷麻醉和暴露于1 Gy或2 Gy电离辐射下是否会在肾细胞DNA损伤反应(碱性彗星试验)方面有所不同,来解决这一差距。我们在暴露0、2、6和24小时后取肾皮质样本,测量彗星参数:尾巴长度和尾巴强度。为了量化细胞修复和重新连接DNA链断裂的效率,我们还计算了细胞DNA修复指数。单独暴露于VA中的任何一种都会增加DNA损伤,七氟烷和异氟烷之间的情况相似,氟烷的损伤程度最高。在联合暴露(VA和1gy辐照)中,DNA损伤在所有时间点保持在相似水平,甚至低于单独辐射造成的损伤。氟烷再次显示出最大的伤害。在与2戈瑞辐射的联合照射下,七氟醚在前三个时间点显著提高了尾部强度,在24小时时,尾部强度下降,甚至低于单独暴露于相应辐射剂量的样品。本研究证实,挥发性麻醉剂能够损伤DNA,而VA与1gy或2gy联合治疗对DNA没有协同损伤作用。需要对作用机制进行进一步的研究,以确定长期观察后肾细胞的损伤程度,以及细胞在暴露于单剂量和多剂量挥发性麻醉剂和放射治疗后恢复的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kidney Cell DNA Damage Caused By Combined Exposure To Volatile Anaesthetics and 1 Gy Or 2 Gy Radiotherapy Dose in Vivo
Abstract Patient immobilisation with volatile anaesthetics (VA) during radiotherapy is sometimes unavoidable. Although it is known that both VAs and ionising radiation can have nephrotoxic effects, there are no studies of their combined effects on DNA damage. The aim of this in vivo study was to address this gap by investigating whether 48 groups of healthy Swiss albino mice (totalling 240) would differ in kidney cell DNA damage response (alkaline comet assay) to isoflurane, sevoflurane, or halothane anaesthesia and exposure to 1 Gy or 2 Gy of ionising radiation. We took kidney cortex samples after 0, 2, 6, and 24 h of exposure and measured comet parameters: tail length and tail intensity. To quantify the efficiency of the cells to repair and re-join DNA strand breaks, we also calculated cellular DNA repair index. Exposure to either VA alone increased DNA damage, which was similar between sevoflurane and isoflurane, and the highest with halothane. In combined exposure (VA and irradiation with 1 Gy) DNA damage remained at similar levels for all time points or was even lower than damage caused by radiation alone. Halothane again demonstrated the highest damage. In combined exposure with irradiation of 2 Gy sevoflurane significantly elevated tail intensity over the first three time points, which decreased and was even lower on hour 24 than in samples exposed to the corresponding radiation dose alone. This study confirmed that volatile anaesthetics are capable of damaging DNA, while combined VA and 1 Gy or 2 Gy treatment did not have a synergistic damaging effect on DNA. Further studies on the mechanisms of action are needed to determine the extent of damage in kidney cells after longer periods of observation and how efficiently the cells can recover from exposure to single and multiple doses of volatile anaesthetics and radiotherapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信