在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在线社交支持是否能独特地缓冲压力效应?

IF 4.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1111/spc3.12836
Madison L Eamiello, Allecia Reid
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在线社交支持是否能独特地缓冲压力效应?","authors":"Madison L Eamiello, Allecia Reid","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In-person sources of social support buffer effects of stress on mental health. However, online social support inconsistently demonstrates stress-buffering effects. Highly stressful circumstances, such as the first month of COVID-19 lockdown, may be necessary to benefit from support received from online networks. We investigated whether online support demonstrated an increased stress-buffering effect on depressive symptoms during the first month of COVID-19 lockdown. We collected cross-sectional data on three distinct groups of participants from February to April 2020-preceding lockdown (pre-COVID; <i>n</i> = 53), up to four weeks following university closures (initial lockdown; <i>n</i> = 136), and the final weeks of the semester (later lockdown; <i>n</i> = 127). Initial lockdown participants reported significantly more stress than pre-COVID but not later lockdown participants. The online social support by stress by COVID phase interaction was only significant for the initial versus later lockdown comparison. Online support buffered stress during initial lockdown but not later lockdown. Stress-buffering effects of offline support were observed and did not depend on COVID phase. Online support may only buffer stress when stress is heightened and offline support is less available.</p>","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Online Social Support Uniquely Buffer Effects of Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic?: A Natural Experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Madison L Eamiello, Allecia Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spc3.12836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In-person sources of social support buffer effects of stress on mental health. However, online social support inconsistently demonstrates stress-buffering effects. Highly stressful circumstances, such as the first month of COVID-19 lockdown, may be necessary to benefit from support received from online networks. We investigated whether online support demonstrated an increased stress-buffering effect on depressive symptoms during the first month of COVID-19 lockdown. We collected cross-sectional data on three distinct groups of participants from February to April 2020-preceding lockdown (pre-COVID; <i>n</i> = 53), up to four weeks following university closures (initial lockdown; <i>n</i> = 136), and the final weeks of the semester (later lockdown; <i>n</i> = 127). Initial lockdown participants reported significantly more stress than pre-COVID but not later lockdown participants. The online social support by stress by COVID phase interaction was only significant for the initial versus later lockdown comparison. Online support buffered stress during initial lockdown but not later lockdown. Stress-buffering effects of offline support were observed and did not depend on COVID phase. Online support may only buffer stress when stress is heightened and offline support is less available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Personality Psychology Compass\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Personality Psychology Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12836\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对面的社会支持可以缓冲压力对心理健康的影响。然而,在线社会支持对压力的缓冲作用并不一致。在高度紧张的情况下,如 COVID-19 封锁的第一个月,可能需要从在线网络支持中获益。我们研究了在 COVID-19 封锁的第一个月中,在线支持是否对抑郁症状产生了更大的压力缓冲作用。我们收集了 2020 年 2 月至 4 月期间三组不同参与者的横截面数据--封锁前(COVID 前;n = 53)、大学关闭后四周(封锁初期;n = 136)和学期最后几周(封锁后期;n = 127)。与 COVID 前相比,封锁初期的参与者报告的压力明显更大,而封锁后期的参与者则没有。在线社会支持与压力、COVID 阶段的交互作用仅在最初与后来的封锁比较中显著。在线支持可以缓冲初始封锁期间的压力,但不能缓冲后期封锁期间的压力。离线支持的压力缓冲作用并不取决于 COVID 阶段。在线支持只有在压力增大、离线支持较少的情况下才能缓冲压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Online Social Support Uniquely Buffer Effects of Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic?: A Natural Experiment.

In-person sources of social support buffer effects of stress on mental health. However, online social support inconsistently demonstrates stress-buffering effects. Highly stressful circumstances, such as the first month of COVID-19 lockdown, may be necessary to benefit from support received from online networks. We investigated whether online support demonstrated an increased stress-buffering effect on depressive symptoms during the first month of COVID-19 lockdown. We collected cross-sectional data on three distinct groups of participants from February to April 2020-preceding lockdown (pre-COVID; n = 53), up to four weeks following university closures (initial lockdown; n = 136), and the final weeks of the semester (later lockdown; n = 127). Initial lockdown participants reported significantly more stress than pre-COVID but not later lockdown participants. The online social support by stress by COVID phase interaction was only significant for the initial versus later lockdown comparison. Online support buffered stress during initial lockdown but not later lockdown. Stress-buffering effects of offline support were observed and did not depend on COVID phase. Online support may only buffer stress when stress is heightened and offline support is less available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Social and Personality Psychology Compass Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信