通过政策和实践实现绿色正义:呼吁进一步研究促进人人享有健康绿色城市的工具

E. Oscilowicz, Isabelle Anguelovski, M. Triguero-Mas, Melissa García-Lamarca​, F. Baró, Helen V. S. Cole
{"title":"通过政策和实践实现绿色正义:呼吁进一步研究促进人人享有健康绿色城市的工具","authors":"E. Oscilowicz, Isabelle Anguelovski, M. Triguero-Mas, Melissa García-Lamarca​, F. Baró, Helen V. S. Cole","doi":"10.1080/23748834.2022.2072057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Green or environmental gentrification has been shown to be directly related to residential physical and socio-cultural displacement and insecure housing conditions among socially or racially underprivileged residents, with clear related health impacts. In this context, those vulnerable groups become unable to benefit from the social, well-being, and overall health benefits of green amenities. To date, despite increasing gentrification and related civic concerns, cities in North America and Europe are still slow to respond. Siloed and reactive planning approaches to (re)development and greening generally do not include housing security and affordability provisions in ways that would be strategic and equity-driven. In this Commentary, we call for further research on the mix of policies and tools that posit multi-sectoral and de-siloed greening agendas in coordination with affordable and stable housing. We open the discussion on four justice-driven policies and tools presented in the Policy Tools for Urban Green Justice (BCNUEJ 2021) report that derives from research conducted in 40 cities, analyzing 480 interviews with key neighborhood stakeholders across Europe and North America. We also call for research that identifies how urban policy developments and anti-gentrification and anti-displacement strategies can be combined with inclusive greening tools to build healthy, green cities for all.","PeriodicalId":72596,"journal":{"name":"Cities & health","volume":"33 1","pages":"878 - 893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green justice through policy and practice: a call for further research into tools that foster healthy green cities for all\",\"authors\":\"E. Oscilowicz, Isabelle Anguelovski, M. Triguero-Mas, Melissa García-Lamarca​, F. Baró, Helen V. S. Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23748834.2022.2072057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Green or environmental gentrification has been shown to be directly related to residential physical and socio-cultural displacement and insecure housing conditions among socially or racially underprivileged residents, with clear related health impacts. In this context, those vulnerable groups become unable to benefit from the social, well-being, and overall health benefits of green amenities. To date, despite increasing gentrification and related civic concerns, cities in North America and Europe are still slow to respond. Siloed and reactive planning approaches to (re)development and greening generally do not include housing security and affordability provisions in ways that would be strategic and equity-driven. In this Commentary, we call for further research on the mix of policies and tools that posit multi-sectoral and de-siloed greening agendas in coordination with affordable and stable housing. We open the discussion on four justice-driven policies and tools presented in the Policy Tools for Urban Green Justice (BCNUEJ 2021) report that derives from research conducted in 40 cities, analyzing 480 interviews with key neighborhood stakeholders across Europe and North America. We also call for research that identifies how urban policy developments and anti-gentrification and anti-displacement strategies can be combined with inclusive greening tools to build healthy, green cities for all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities & health\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"878 - 893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2072057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2072057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

绿色或环境高档化已被证明与社会或种族弱势居民的居住物质和社会文化流离失所以及不安全的住房条件直接相关,并具有明显的相关健康影响。在这种情况下,这些弱势群体无法从绿色设施的社会、福祉和整体健康效益中受益。迄今为止,尽管中产阶级化和相关的公民关注日益增加,但北美和欧洲的城市仍然反应迟缓。孤立和被动的(再)开发和绿化规划方法通常不包括住房保障和可负担性规定,这将是战略和公平驱动的方式。在本评论中,我们呼吁进一步研究政策和工具的组合,以制定多部门和非孤立的绿色议程,并与经济适用和稳定的住房相协调。我们首先讨论城市绿色正义政策工具(BCNUEJ 2021)报告中提出的四项正义驱动的政策和工具,该报告源自对欧洲和北美40个城市的研究,分析了对主要社区利益相关者的480次访谈。我们还呼吁开展研究,确定如何将城市政策发展、反中产阶级化和反流离失所战略与包容性绿化工具相结合,为所有人建设健康、绿色的城市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green justice through policy and practice: a call for further research into tools that foster healthy green cities for all
ABSTRACT Green or environmental gentrification has been shown to be directly related to residential physical and socio-cultural displacement and insecure housing conditions among socially or racially underprivileged residents, with clear related health impacts. In this context, those vulnerable groups become unable to benefit from the social, well-being, and overall health benefits of green amenities. To date, despite increasing gentrification and related civic concerns, cities in North America and Europe are still slow to respond. Siloed and reactive planning approaches to (re)development and greening generally do not include housing security and affordability provisions in ways that would be strategic and equity-driven. In this Commentary, we call for further research on the mix of policies and tools that posit multi-sectoral and de-siloed greening agendas in coordination with affordable and stable housing. We open the discussion on four justice-driven policies and tools presented in the Policy Tools for Urban Green Justice (BCNUEJ 2021) report that derives from research conducted in 40 cities, analyzing 480 interviews with key neighborhood stakeholders across Europe and North America. We also call for research that identifies how urban policy developments and anti-gentrification and anti-displacement strategies can be combined with inclusive greening tools to build healthy, green cities for all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信