季节流量对温度驱动的莱茵河流域蒸发和降雪过程变化的响应

J. Buitink, L. Melsen, A. Teuling
{"title":"季节流量对温度驱动的莱茵河流域蒸发和降雪过程变化的响应","authors":"J. Buitink, L. Melsen, A. Teuling","doi":"10.5194/ESD-12-387-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study analyses how temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow processes influence the discharge in the Rhine Basin.\nUsing an efficient distributed hydrological model at high spatio-temporal resolution, we performed two experiments to understand how changes in temperature affect the discharge.\nIn the first experiment, we compared two 10-year periods (1980s and 2010s) to determine how changes in discharge can be related to changes in evaporation, snowfall, melt from snow and ice, and precipitation. By simulating these periods, we can exchange the forcing components (evaporation, temperature for snowfall and melt, and precipitation), to quantify their individual and combined effects on the discharge.\nAround half of the observed changes could be explained by the changes induced by temperature effects on snowfall and melt (10 %), temperature effects on evaporation (16 %), and precipitation (19 %), showing that temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow (26 %) are larger than the precipitation-driven changes (19 %).\nThe remaining 55 % was driven by the interaction of these variables: e.g. the type of precipitation (interaction between temperature and precipitation) or the amount of generated runoff (interaction between evaporation and precipitation).\nIn the second experiment we exclude the effect of precipitation and run scenarios with realistically increased temperatures. These simulations show that discharge is generally expected to decrease due to the positive effect of temperature on (potential) evaporation.\nHowever, more liquid precipitation and different melt dynamics from snow and ice can slightly offset this reduction in discharge. Earlier snowmelt leaves less snowpack available to melt during spring, when it historically melts, and amplifies the discharge reduction caused by the enhanced evaporation.\nThese results are tested over a range of rooting depths.\nThis study shows how the combined effects of temperature-driven changes affect discharge. With many basins around the world depending on meltwater, a correct understanding of these changes and their interaction is vital.","PeriodicalId":11466,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","volume":"31 1","pages":"387-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seasonal discharge response to temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow processes in the Rhine Basin\",\"authors\":\"J. Buitink, L. Melsen, A. Teuling\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/ESD-12-387-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. This study analyses how temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow processes influence the discharge in the Rhine Basin.\\nUsing an efficient distributed hydrological model at high spatio-temporal resolution, we performed two experiments to understand how changes in temperature affect the discharge.\\nIn the first experiment, we compared two 10-year periods (1980s and 2010s) to determine how changes in discharge can be related to changes in evaporation, snowfall, melt from snow and ice, and precipitation. By simulating these periods, we can exchange the forcing components (evaporation, temperature for snowfall and melt, and precipitation), to quantify their individual and combined effects on the discharge.\\nAround half of the observed changes could be explained by the changes induced by temperature effects on snowfall and melt (10 %), temperature effects on evaporation (16 %), and precipitation (19 %), showing that temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow (26 %) are larger than the precipitation-driven changes (19 %).\\nThe remaining 55 % was driven by the interaction of these variables: e.g. the type of precipitation (interaction between temperature and precipitation) or the amount of generated runoff (interaction between evaporation and precipitation).\\nIn the second experiment we exclude the effect of precipitation and run scenarios with realistically increased temperatures. These simulations show that discharge is generally expected to decrease due to the positive effect of temperature on (potential) evaporation.\\nHowever, more liquid precipitation and different melt dynamics from snow and ice can slightly offset this reduction in discharge. Earlier snowmelt leaves less snowpack available to melt during spring, when it historically melts, and amplifies the discharge reduction caused by the enhanced evaporation.\\nThese results are tested over a range of rooting depths.\\nThis study shows how the combined effects of temperature-driven changes affect discharge. With many basins around the world depending on meltwater, a correct understanding of these changes and their interaction is vital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Dynamics Discussions\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"387-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Dynamics Discussions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/ESD-12-387-2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ESD-12-387-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本研究分析了温度驱动的蒸发和降雪过程的变化如何影响莱茵河流域的流量。利用高时空分辨率的高效分布式水文模型,我们进行了两个实验来了解温度变化如何影响流量。在第一个实验中,我们比较了两个10年周期(20世纪80年代和2010年代),以确定流量的变化与蒸发、降雪、冰雪融化和降水的变化之间的关系。通过模拟这些时期,我们可以交换强迫分量(蒸发、降雪和融化的温度以及降水),以量化它们对流量的单独和综合影响。观测到的变化中约有一半可以由温度对降雪和融雪的影响(10%)、温度对蒸发的影响(16%)和降水(19%)引起的变化来解释,这表明温度驱动的蒸发和降雪变化(26%)大于降水驱动的变化(19%)。其余55%是由这些变量的相互作用驱动的:例如,降水类型(温度和降水之间的相互作用)或产生的径流量(蒸发和降水之间的相互作用)。在第二个实验中,我们排除了降水的影响,并运行了实际温度升高的情景。这些模拟表明,由于温度对(电位)蒸发的积极影响,通常预计流量会减少。然而,更多的液体降水和不同的冰雪融化动态可以略微抵消这种排放量的减少。早期融雪导致春季可利用融雪量减少,而春季融雪量在历史上是融化的,并放大了蒸发增强造成的流量减少。这些结果是在一定的生根深度范围内进行测试的。该研究显示了温度驱动变化的综合效应如何影响放电。由于世界上许多盆地都依赖融水,因此正确理解这些变化及其相互作用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seasonal discharge response to temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow processes in the Rhine Basin
Abstract. This study analyses how temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow processes influence the discharge in the Rhine Basin. Using an efficient distributed hydrological model at high spatio-temporal resolution, we performed two experiments to understand how changes in temperature affect the discharge. In the first experiment, we compared two 10-year periods (1980s and 2010s) to determine how changes in discharge can be related to changes in evaporation, snowfall, melt from snow and ice, and precipitation. By simulating these periods, we can exchange the forcing components (evaporation, temperature for snowfall and melt, and precipitation), to quantify their individual and combined effects on the discharge. Around half of the observed changes could be explained by the changes induced by temperature effects on snowfall and melt (10 %), temperature effects on evaporation (16 %), and precipitation (19 %), showing that temperature-driven changes in evaporation and snow (26 %) are larger than the precipitation-driven changes (19 %). The remaining 55 % was driven by the interaction of these variables: e.g. the type of precipitation (interaction between temperature and precipitation) or the amount of generated runoff (interaction between evaporation and precipitation). In the second experiment we exclude the effect of precipitation and run scenarios with realistically increased temperatures. These simulations show that discharge is generally expected to decrease due to the positive effect of temperature on (potential) evaporation. However, more liquid precipitation and different melt dynamics from snow and ice can slightly offset this reduction in discharge. Earlier snowmelt leaves less snowpack available to melt during spring, when it historically melts, and amplifies the discharge reduction caused by the enhanced evaporation. These results are tested over a range of rooting depths. This study shows how the combined effects of temperature-driven changes affect discharge. With many basins around the world depending on meltwater, a correct understanding of these changes and their interaction is vital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信