E. Rimstad, L. Håvarstein, G. Kapperud, J. Lassen, B. Lunestad, T. Nesbakken, L. Robertson, E. Skjerve, Y. Wasteson
{"title":"挪威肉类连锁店中产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的风险评估,重点是干腌香肠","authors":"E. Rimstad, L. Håvarstein, G. Kapperud, J. Lassen, B. Lunestad, T. Nesbakken, L. Robertson, E. Skjerve, Y. Wasteson","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i430404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n coli is part of the normal gastrointestinal microbial flora of humans and animals. E. coli bacteria causing enteric/diarrhoeal disease are categorized into different groups based on their virulence properties and pathogenic features in humans. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are E. coli strains that cause bloody diarrhoea and haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) in humans, and have a defined zoonotic association. The major virulence factor of EHEC (and the actual cause of HUS) is the ability to produce Shiga toxins (Stx), thus the name Shiga Toxin Producing E. coli (STEC). With enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), the diarrhoea in these patients is due to attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions in the enteric epithelium. \n \n \nThis risk assessment was conducted after a human outbreak of STEC O103 in 2006, associated with contaminated dry-fermented sausages. \n \nThe Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomitéen for mattrygghet), Panel on Biological Hazards, was asked by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet) for a risk assessment regarding shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) in the Norwegian meat chain, with emphasis on dry-cured sausages. In response, an ad hoc Working Group of experts was appointed with the mandate to draft a risk assessment regarding this issue. \n \nThe current report approaches the task by following and analysing the entire process, from the origin of the meats at farm level, to the final production and storage of dry-cured sausages. An overall aim of the report has been to identify and describe potential intervention options in various parts of this chain. \n \nThe main conclusions from the risk assessment are as follows: \n \n \nIt is not possible to give any reliable quantitative estimates of the current risk associated with consumption of dry-cured sausages. \n \n \n \nThere are no clear indications of any general change in the epidemiology of STEC infections in humans in Norway over the last decade. \n \n \n \nThere is no documentation that there has been any change in the occurrence of various STEC in the domestic animal reservoir during the last decade. \n \n \n \nThe combination of proper slaughter hygiene and use of thermal decontamination of sheep, cattle and pig carcasses represents an efficient way to reduce STEC contamination. This approach would not only cause a reduction in the contamination level of STEC, but also provide a general beneficial effect on the level of other enteric pathogens, such as Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica. \n \n \n \nProper use of starter cultures in fermentation, combined with higher fermentation temperatures, will reduce the probability of growth of STEC in contaminated drycured sausages. \n \n \n \nA combination of higher fermentation temperatures, a lower pH during the process, and heat-treatment of the final product should effectively eliminate the potential risk for transmission of STEC infections from consumption of dry-cured sausages. A 5 log reduction is possible. \n \n \n \nTechnological options are available to reduce significantly the transfer of potential pathogens through meats in general, and specifically through dry-cured sausages. \n \n \n \nThe most important data gap is the lack of information about the actual occurrence of STEC infections in humans in Norway. Improved laboratory diagnostic procedures and epidemiological surveillance, combined with better reporting and tracing in the health care system are necessary. \n \n \n \nThe implementation of properly designed base-line studies of various domestic animals, to provide data on the occurrence of various serotypes and their virulence factors present is recommended. Also, this would provide a better basis for comparison with human isolates. \n","PeriodicalId":11994,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Risk Assessment of Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in the Norwegian Meat Chain with Emphasis on Dry-cured Sausages\",\"authors\":\"E. Rimstad, L. Håvarstein, G. Kapperud, J. Lassen, B. Lunestad, T. Nesbakken, L. Robertson, E. Skjerve, Y. Wasteson\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i430404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n coli is part of the normal gastrointestinal microbial flora of humans and animals. E. coli bacteria causing enteric/diarrhoeal disease are categorized into different groups based on their virulence properties and pathogenic features in humans. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are E. coli strains that cause bloody diarrhoea and haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) in humans, and have a defined zoonotic association. The major virulence factor of EHEC (and the actual cause of HUS) is the ability to produce Shiga toxins (Stx), thus the name Shiga Toxin Producing E. coli (STEC). With enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), the diarrhoea in these patients is due to attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions in the enteric epithelium. \\n \\n \\nThis risk assessment was conducted after a human outbreak of STEC O103 in 2006, associated with contaminated dry-fermented sausages. \\n \\nThe Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomitéen for mattrygghet), Panel on Biological Hazards, was asked by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet) for a risk assessment regarding shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) in the Norwegian meat chain, with emphasis on dry-cured sausages. In response, an ad hoc Working Group of experts was appointed with the mandate to draft a risk assessment regarding this issue. \\n \\nThe current report approaches the task by following and analysing the entire process, from the origin of the meats at farm level, to the final production and storage of dry-cured sausages. An overall aim of the report has been to identify and describe potential intervention options in various parts of this chain. \\n \\nThe main conclusions from the risk assessment are as follows: \\n \\n \\nIt is not possible to give any reliable quantitative estimates of the current risk associated with consumption of dry-cured sausages. \\n \\n \\n \\nThere are no clear indications of any general change in the epidemiology of STEC infections in humans in Norway over the last decade. \\n \\n \\n \\nThere is no documentation that there has been any change in the occurrence of various STEC in the domestic animal reservoir during the last decade. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe combination of proper slaughter hygiene and use of thermal decontamination of sheep, cattle and pig carcasses represents an efficient way to reduce STEC contamination. This approach would not only cause a reduction in the contamination level of STEC, but also provide a general beneficial effect on the level of other enteric pathogens, such as Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica. \\n \\n \\n \\nProper use of starter cultures in fermentation, combined with higher fermentation temperatures, will reduce the probability of growth of STEC in contaminated drycured sausages. \\n \\n \\n \\nA combination of higher fermentation temperatures, a lower pH during the process, and heat-treatment of the final product should effectively eliminate the potential risk for transmission of STEC infections from consumption of dry-cured sausages. A 5 log reduction is possible. \\n \\n \\n \\nTechnological options are available to reduce significantly the transfer of potential pathogens through meats in general, and specifically through dry-cured sausages. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe most important data gap is the lack of information about the actual occurrence of STEC infections in humans in Norway. Improved laboratory diagnostic procedures and epidemiological surveillance, combined with better reporting and tracing in the health care system are necessary. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe implementation of properly designed base-line studies of various domestic animals, to provide data on the occurrence of various serotypes and their virulence factors present is recommended. Also, this would provide a better basis for comparison with human isolates. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i430404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i430404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
大肠杆菌是人类和动物正常胃肠道微生物菌群的一部分。引起肠道/腹泻疾病的大肠杆菌根据其对人类的毒力特性和致病性特征被分为不同的组。肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)是引起人类出血性腹泻和溶血性尿毒综合征(HUS)的大肠杆菌菌株,并具有明确的人畜共患关系。肠出血性大肠杆菌(也是溶血性尿毒综合征的实际原因)的主要毒力因子是产生志贺毒素(Stx)的能力,因此被称为产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)。患有肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC),这些患者的腹泻是由于肠上皮的附着和消退(A/E)病变。这一风险评估是在2006年与受污染的干发酵香肠有关的产肠毒素大肠杆菌O103人间暴发之后进行的。挪威食品安全局(Mattilsynet)要求挪威食品安全科学委员会(vitenskapskomitsamen for mattrygghet)生物危害小组对挪威肉类链中产生志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)进行风险评估,重点是干腌香肠。为此,任命了一个特设专家工作组,其任务是起草关于这一问题的风险评估报告。目前的报告通过跟踪和分析整个过程来完成这项任务,从肉类在农场一级的起源,到干腌香肠的最终生产和储存。该报告的总体目标是确定和描述在这一链的各个部分的潜在干预方案。风险评估的主要结论如下:不可能对目前与食用干腌香肠有关的风险给出任何可靠的定量估计。在过去十年中,没有明确的迹象表明挪威人类产志贺毒素大肠杆菌感染的流行病学有任何普遍变化。没有文献表明,在过去十年中,家畜储存库中各种产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的发生率有任何变化。适当的屠宰卫生和对羊、牛和猪尸体进行热消毒相结合是减少产肠毒素感染的有效方法。这种方法不仅会降低产肠毒素大肠杆菌的污染水平,而且还会对其他肠道病原体(如沙门氏菌和小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌)的水平产生普遍有益的影响。在发酵过程中适当使用发酵剂,再加上较高的发酵温度,将降低受污染的干腌香肠中产大肠杆菌生长的可能性。较高的发酵温度、过程中较低的pH值和最终产品的热处理相结合,应有效消除因食用干腌香肠而传播产大肠杆菌感染的潜在风险。减少5个对数是可能的。现有的技术选择可以显著减少潜在病原体通过肉类,特别是通过干腌香肠的传播。最重要的数据缺口是缺乏关于挪威人类产肠毒素大肠杆菌感染实际发生情况的信息。有必要改进实验室诊断程序和流行病学监测,同时在卫生保健系统中改进报告和追踪。建议对各种家畜进行适当设计的基线研究,以提供关于各种血清型的发生及其存在的毒力因子的数据。此外,这将为与人类分离株进行比较提供更好的基础。
A Risk Assessment of Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in the Norwegian Meat Chain with Emphasis on Dry-cured Sausages
coli is part of the normal gastrointestinal microbial flora of humans and animals. E. coli bacteria causing enteric/diarrhoeal disease are categorized into different groups based on their virulence properties and pathogenic features in humans. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are E. coli strains that cause bloody diarrhoea and haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) in humans, and have a defined zoonotic association. The major virulence factor of EHEC (and the actual cause of HUS) is the ability to produce Shiga toxins (Stx), thus the name Shiga Toxin Producing E. coli (STEC). With enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), the diarrhoea in these patients is due to attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions in the enteric epithelium.
This risk assessment was conducted after a human outbreak of STEC O103 in 2006, associated with contaminated dry-fermented sausages.
The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomitéen for mattrygghet), Panel on Biological Hazards, was asked by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet) for a risk assessment regarding shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) in the Norwegian meat chain, with emphasis on dry-cured sausages. In response, an ad hoc Working Group of experts was appointed with the mandate to draft a risk assessment regarding this issue.
The current report approaches the task by following and analysing the entire process, from the origin of the meats at farm level, to the final production and storage of dry-cured sausages. An overall aim of the report has been to identify and describe potential intervention options in various parts of this chain.
The main conclusions from the risk assessment are as follows:
It is not possible to give any reliable quantitative estimates of the current risk associated with consumption of dry-cured sausages.
There are no clear indications of any general change in the epidemiology of STEC infections in humans in Norway over the last decade.
There is no documentation that there has been any change in the occurrence of various STEC in the domestic animal reservoir during the last decade.
The combination of proper slaughter hygiene and use of thermal decontamination of sheep, cattle and pig carcasses represents an efficient way to reduce STEC contamination. This approach would not only cause a reduction in the contamination level of STEC, but also provide a general beneficial effect on the level of other enteric pathogens, such as Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica.
Proper use of starter cultures in fermentation, combined with higher fermentation temperatures, will reduce the probability of growth of STEC in contaminated drycured sausages.
A combination of higher fermentation temperatures, a lower pH during the process, and heat-treatment of the final product should effectively eliminate the potential risk for transmission of STEC infections from consumption of dry-cured sausages. A 5 log reduction is possible.
Technological options are available to reduce significantly the transfer of potential pathogens through meats in general, and specifically through dry-cured sausages.
The most important data gap is the lack of information about the actual occurrence of STEC infections in humans in Norway. Improved laboratory diagnostic procedures and epidemiological surveillance, combined with better reporting and tracing in the health care system are necessary.
The implementation of properly designed base-line studies of various domestic animals, to provide data on the occurrence of various serotypes and their virulence factors present is recommended. Also, this would provide a better basis for comparison with human isolates.