{"title":"概率与随机变量课程的结果评估方法","authors":"P. Shankar","doi":"10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:A methodology to assess the student learning outcomes in the course \"Probability for Engineers\" has been implemented. The indirect assessment strategy relied on student surveys at the beginning and the conclusion of the course. The direct assessment was based on tracking the student scores in midterm examination I, midterm examination II, and the final examination, question by question on topics related to the learning outcomes. The enhancements in performance in three topics grouped to include all learning outcomes were monitored as the course progressed. Robustness of the quantitative measures of indirect and direct assessments was ensured through hypothesis tests. The results demonstrated that the goals of the course were met in terms of the higher level of understanding by the students at the end of the term. While there is still room for improvement, the methodology developed here can be easily extended to courses in other disciplines. Keywords: direct and indirect assessments, engineering education, engineering probability, outcomes assessment, probability and random variables","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"98 1","pages":"71 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes Assessment Methodology for a Course in Probability and Random Variables\",\"authors\":\"P. Shankar\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:A methodology to assess the student learning outcomes in the course \\\"Probability for Engineers\\\" has been implemented. The indirect assessment strategy relied on student surveys at the beginning and the conclusion of the course. The direct assessment was based on tracking the student scores in midterm examination I, midterm examination II, and the final examination, question by question on topics related to the learning outcomes. The enhancements in performance in three topics grouped to include all learning outcomes were monitored as the course progressed. Robustness of the quantitative measures of indirect and direct assessments was ensured through hypothesis tests. The results demonstrated that the goals of the course were met in terms of the higher level of understanding by the students at the end of the term. While there is still room for improvement, the methodology developed here can be easily extended to courses in other disciplines. Keywords: direct and indirect assessments, engineering education, engineering probability, outcomes assessment, probability and random variables\",\"PeriodicalId\":56185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.8.1-2.0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes Assessment Methodology for a Course in Probability and Random Variables
abstract:A methodology to assess the student learning outcomes in the course "Probability for Engineers" has been implemented. The indirect assessment strategy relied on student surveys at the beginning and the conclusion of the course. The direct assessment was based on tracking the student scores in midterm examination I, midterm examination II, and the final examination, question by question on topics related to the learning outcomes. The enhancements in performance in three topics grouped to include all learning outcomes were monitored as the course progressed. Robustness of the quantitative measures of indirect and direct assessments was ensured through hypothesis tests. The results demonstrated that the goals of the course were met in terms of the higher level of understanding by the students at the end of the term. While there is still room for improvement, the methodology developed here can be easily extended to courses in other disciplines. Keywords: direct and indirect assessments, engineering education, engineering probability, outcomes assessment, probability and random variables
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.