福利预算和环境

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
S. Upton
{"title":"福利预算和环境","authors":"S. Upton","doi":"10.26686/pq.v18i3.7710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wellbeing budgets have created a need to link the environment to wellbeing. This may seem like a self-evident task, but in practice it is extremely difficult. There is often not enough information to link how a given environmental policy or initiative will impact on the environment, let alone how it will impact on wellbeing. These difficulties are compounded by the fact that many environmental issues are complex, long-term, or characterised by tipping points. So far, decision makers have not had adequate advice to make informed trade-offs between investing in wellbeing now and investing in wellbeing for the future. In order to address these limitations, the government and its advisors should consider whether it is worth treating environmental spending in a different way.","PeriodicalId":43642,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wellbeing Budgets and the Environment\",\"authors\":\"S. Upton\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/pq.v18i3.7710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wellbeing budgets have created a need to link the environment to wellbeing. This may seem like a self-evident task, but in practice it is extremely difficult. There is often not enough information to link how a given environmental policy or initiative will impact on the environment, let alone how it will impact on wellbeing. These difficulties are compounded by the fact that many environmental issues are complex, long-term, or characterised by tipping points. So far, decision makers have not had adequate advice to make informed trade-offs between investing in wellbeing now and investing in wellbeing for the future. In order to address these limitations, the government and its advisors should consider whether it is worth treating environmental spending in a different way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Policy Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Policy Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v18i3.7710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v18i3.7710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

福利预算创造了将环境与福利联系起来的需求。这似乎是一项不言而喻的任务,但在实践中却是极其困难的。通常没有足够的信息将特定的环境政策或倡议如何影响环境联系起来,更不用说如何影响福祉了。许多环境问题是复杂的、长期的或具有临界点的,这一事实使这些困难更加复杂。到目前为止,决策者还没有得到足够的建议,在投资于现在的幸福和投资于未来的幸福之间做出明智的权衡。为了解决这些限制,政府及其顾问应该考虑是否值得以不同的方式对待环境支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wellbeing Budgets and the Environment
Wellbeing budgets have created a need to link the environment to wellbeing. This may seem like a self-evident task, but in practice it is extremely difficult. There is often not enough information to link how a given environmental policy or initiative will impact on the environment, let alone how it will impact on wellbeing. These difficulties are compounded by the fact that many environmental issues are complex, long-term, or characterised by tipping points. So far, decision makers have not had adequate advice to make informed trade-offs between investing in wellbeing now and investing in wellbeing for the future. In order to address these limitations, the government and its advisors should consider whether it is worth treating environmental spending in a different way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Policy Quarterly
Turkish Policy Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信