教学文学中的差异性概念:克罗地亚与塞尔维亚第一阶段教学大纲的比较分析

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bojana Marković, V. Mićić, V. Vukomanovic
{"title":"教学文学中的差异性概念:克罗地亚与塞尔维亚第一阶段教学大纲的比较分析","authors":"Bojana Marković, V. Mićić, V. Vukomanovic","doi":"10.15516/CJE.V19I0.2625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the presence of the concept of dissimilitude in the selection of literary texts for children prescribed by the syllabi in Croatia and Serbia. The comparative analysis is based on providing a list of texts for the first cycle of education in the two syllabi through a concept-based (transcending the text) observation of dissimilitude, as well as a content-based (text-inherent) analysis of the presence of dissimilitude in these texts in its broadest sense. In the literary texts prescribed by the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Serbia, the field of dissimilitude thematization can largely be attributed to the nature of the literary work itself, rather than the curricular or concept-based education policy behind the current syllabi. The paper presents results of the analyses of the two syllabi that are conceptually quite different. The aim of this paper is to compare educational strategies for teaching literature in two countries – Croatia and Serbia – by analysing the presence of dissimilitude in a selection of literary texts.","PeriodicalId":44438,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of Dissimilitude in Teaching Literature: Comparative Analysis of Syllabi for the First Cycle of Education in Croatia and Serbia\",\"authors\":\"Bojana Marković, V. Mićić, V. Vukomanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.15516/CJE.V19I0.2625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on the presence of the concept of dissimilitude in the selection of literary texts for children prescribed by the syllabi in Croatia and Serbia. The comparative analysis is based on providing a list of texts for the first cycle of education in the two syllabi through a concept-based (transcending the text) observation of dissimilitude, as well as a content-based (text-inherent) analysis of the presence of dissimilitude in these texts in its broadest sense. In the literary texts prescribed by the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Serbia, the field of dissimilitude thematization can largely be attributed to the nature of the literary work itself, rather than the curricular or concept-based education policy behind the current syllabi. The paper presents results of the analyses of the two syllabi that are conceptually quite different. The aim of this paper is to compare educational strategies for teaching literature in two countries – Croatia and Serbia – by analysing the presence of dissimilitude in a selection of literary texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15516/CJE.V19I0.2625\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15516/CJE.V19I0.2625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文着重讨论了克罗地亚和塞尔维亚教学大纲规定的儿童文学文本选择中存在的差异概念。对比分析的基础是通过基于概念(超越文本)的差异观察,以及基于内容(文本固有)的分析,在最广泛的意义上分析这些文本中存在的差异,提供两个教学大纲中第一周期教育的文本列表。在克罗地亚共和国和塞尔维亚共和国规定的文学文本中,不同主题化的领域在很大程度上可归因于文学作品本身的性质,而不是当前教学大纲背后的课程或基于概念的教育政策。本文介绍了两种概念截然不同的教学大纲的分析结果。本文的目的是通过分析文学文本中存在的差异来比较克罗地亚和塞尔维亚这两个国家的文学教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Concept of Dissimilitude in Teaching Literature: Comparative Analysis of Syllabi for the First Cycle of Education in Croatia and Serbia
This article focuses on the presence of the concept of dissimilitude in the selection of literary texts for children prescribed by the syllabi in Croatia and Serbia. The comparative analysis is based on providing a list of texts for the first cycle of education in the two syllabi through a concept-based (transcending the text) observation of dissimilitude, as well as a content-based (text-inherent) analysis of the presence of dissimilitude in these texts in its broadest sense. In the literary texts prescribed by the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Serbia, the field of dissimilitude thematization can largely be attributed to the nature of the literary work itself, rather than the curricular or concept-based education policy behind the current syllabi. The paper presents results of the analyses of the two syllabi that are conceptually quite different. The aim of this paper is to compare educational strategies for teaching literature in two countries – Croatia and Serbia – by analysing the presence of dissimilitude in a selection of literary texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信