{"title":"杰弗里成像重访","authors":"Melissa Fusco","doi":"10.1093/analys/anac036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In ‘The logic of partial supposition’ (Analysis vol. 81), Benjamin Eva and Stephan Hartmann investigate partial imaging , a credence-revision method which combines the partiality familiar from Jeffrey Conditioning(The Logic of Decision , 1983 ) with the formal notion of imaging familiar from Lewis’s ‘Causal decision theory’ (1981 ). They argue that because partial imaging is non-monotonic, it ‘fail[s] to provide a plausible account of the norms of partial subjunctive suppositions’.\n In this note, I present a notion of partial imaging that does satisfy monotonicity, and discuss some of the applications and ramifications. The account frames conditioning as a form of imaging, and rejects Gärdenfors’s principle of linearity in ‘Imaging and conditionalization’ (1982 ).","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jeffrey imaging revisited\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Fusco\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/analys/anac036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In ‘The logic of partial supposition’ (Analysis vol. 81), Benjamin Eva and Stephan Hartmann investigate partial imaging , a credence-revision method which combines the partiality familiar from Jeffrey Conditioning(The Logic of Decision , 1983 ) with the formal notion of imaging familiar from Lewis’s ‘Causal decision theory’ (1981 ). They argue that because partial imaging is non-monotonic, it ‘fail[s] to provide a plausible account of the norms of partial subjunctive suppositions’.\\n In this note, I present a notion of partial imaging that does satisfy monotonicity, and discuss some of the applications and ramifications. The account frames conditioning as a form of imaging, and rejects Gärdenfors’s principle of linearity in ‘Imaging and conditionalization’ (1982 ).\",\"PeriodicalId\":82310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophic research and analysis\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophic research and analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anac036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophic research and analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anac036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在“部分假设的逻辑”(分析第81卷)中,Benjamin Eva和Stephan Hartmann研究了部分成像,这是一种信任修正方法,它结合了Jeffrey Conditioning(The logic of Decision, 1983)中熟悉的偏见,以及Lewis的“因果决策理论”(1981)中熟悉的形式化成像概念。他们认为,因为部分想象是非单调的,所以它“无法提供部分虚拟假设规范的合理解释”。在这篇笔记中,我提出了一个部分成像的概念,它确实满足单调性,并讨论了一些应用和后果。该解释将条件作用框架为一种成像形式,并拒绝Gärdenfors在“成像和条件化”(1982)中的线性原则。
In ‘The logic of partial supposition’ (Analysis vol. 81), Benjamin Eva and Stephan Hartmann investigate partial imaging , a credence-revision method which combines the partiality familiar from Jeffrey Conditioning(The Logic of Decision , 1983 ) with the formal notion of imaging familiar from Lewis’s ‘Causal decision theory’ (1981 ). They argue that because partial imaging is non-monotonic, it ‘fail[s] to provide a plausible account of the norms of partial subjunctive suppositions’.
In this note, I present a notion of partial imaging that does satisfy monotonicity, and discuss some of the applications and ramifications. The account frames conditioning as a form of imaging, and rejects Gärdenfors’s principle of linearity in ‘Imaging and conditionalization’ (1982 ).