自治与外交政策:巴西在卢拉政府反恐斗争中的案例

IF 0.1 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Sophia Luiza Zaia
{"title":"自治与外交政策:巴西在卢拉政府反恐斗争中的案例","authors":"Sophia Luiza Zaia","doi":"10.20889/M47E19012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Brazilian Foreign Policy during Lula’s administration and how the concept of autonomy has shaped Brazil’s stance on alleged terrorist activities within its borders. By using the Neoclassical Realist approach, this article explores how autonomy has allowed for Brazil to oppose the pressures of the United States’ led Global War on Terror between 2003-2010. Autonomy has worked as an intervening variable that allowed for Brazilian Foreign Policy, to some extent, to take its own direction in matters of security.","PeriodicalId":53765,"journal":{"name":"Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autonomy and Foreign Policy: the Brazilian Case on the Fight Against Terrorism in the Lula administration\",\"authors\":\"Sophia Luiza Zaia\",\"doi\":\"10.20889/M47E19012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines Brazilian Foreign Policy during Lula’s administration and how the concept of autonomy has shaped Brazil’s stance on alleged terrorist activities within its borders. By using the Neoclassical Realist approach, this article explores how autonomy has allowed for Brazil to oppose the pressures of the United States’ led Global War on Terror between 2003-2010. Autonomy has worked as an intervening variable that allowed for Brazilian Foreign Policy, to some extent, to take its own direction in matters of security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20889/M47E19012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20889/M47E19012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了卢拉执政期间的巴西外交政策,以及自治的概念如何塑造了巴西对其境内所谓恐怖活动的立场。本文运用新古典现实主义的方法,探讨了自治是如何让巴西对抗美国在2003-2010年领导的全球反恐战争的压力的。自治作为一种干预变量,在某种程度上允许巴西外交政策在安全问题上采取自己的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autonomy and Foreign Policy: the Brazilian Case on the Fight Against Terrorism in the Lula administration
This paper examines Brazilian Foreign Policy during Lula’s administration and how the concept of autonomy has shaped Brazil’s stance on alleged terrorist activities within its borders. By using the Neoclassical Realist approach, this article explores how autonomy has allowed for Brazil to oppose the pressures of the United States’ led Global War on Terror between 2003-2010. Autonomy has worked as an intervening variable that allowed for Brazilian Foreign Policy, to some extent, to take its own direction in matters of security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies
Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信