新的世界卫生组织和国际协调委员会骨髓增生异常综合征分类系统及其对临床实验室的影响。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of Hematopathology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s12308-023-00538-7
Frido K Bruehl, Mazen M Osman, Dong Chen, Joanna C Dalland
{"title":"新的世界卫生组织和国际协调委员会骨髓增生异常综合征分类系统及其对临床实验室的影响。","authors":"Frido K Bruehl, Mazen M Osman, Dong Chen, Joanna C Dalland","doi":"10.1007/s12308-023-00538-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Consensus Classification (ICC) and World Health Organization (WHO) proposed significant changes to the diagnostic criteria of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in 2022. The impact of these criteria on hematopathology practice is uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the 2022 ICC and WHO 5th edition classifications on the diagnosis of cytopenias and MDS. Cases from 2021 performed for primary diagnosis of cytopenia(s)/MDS and their clinical, laboratory, and pathologic findings were reviewed and classified according to the new classification systems. The rate of major changes to the diagnosis was determined and potential pitfalls in the diagnostic approach, laboratory workflow, and clinical communication challenges were investigated. A total of 49 cases were recruited. Major changes to the diagnostic entities were made in 18/49 (37%) cases according to the WHO 5th edition, and 23/49 (47%) cases classified according to the ICC. The difference was accounted for by five cases of MDS-EB2 (revised WHO 4th edition) classified as MDS/AML (major change) in the ICC in contrast to no significant change (MDS-IB2) in the WHO 5th edition. MDS-SLD cases were not subject to major reclassification according to either system. The new molecularly defined categories of CCUS/CHIP, MDS-SF3B1, and MDS with biallelic TP53 mutations were almost identically represented in both systems in our cohort. A case of MDS-MLD was reclassified as CMML by both classification systems. There are few but important differences between the new MDS classification systems. A preimplementation assessment is helpful to identify diagnostic and potential clinical impacts of their adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":51320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hematopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The new WHO and ICC classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes and their impact on the clinical laboratory.\",\"authors\":\"Frido K Bruehl, Mazen M Osman, Dong Chen, Joanna C Dalland\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12308-023-00538-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The International Consensus Classification (ICC) and World Health Organization (WHO) proposed significant changes to the diagnostic criteria of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in 2022. The impact of these criteria on hematopathology practice is uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the 2022 ICC and WHO 5th edition classifications on the diagnosis of cytopenias and MDS. Cases from 2021 performed for primary diagnosis of cytopenia(s)/MDS and their clinical, laboratory, and pathologic findings were reviewed and classified according to the new classification systems. The rate of major changes to the diagnosis was determined and potential pitfalls in the diagnostic approach, laboratory workflow, and clinical communication challenges were investigated. A total of 49 cases were recruited. Major changes to the diagnostic entities were made in 18/49 (37%) cases according to the WHO 5th edition, and 23/49 (47%) cases classified according to the ICC. The difference was accounted for by five cases of MDS-EB2 (revised WHO 4th edition) classified as MDS/AML (major change) in the ICC in contrast to no significant change (MDS-IB2) in the WHO 5th edition. MDS-SLD cases were not subject to major reclassification according to either system. The new molecularly defined categories of CCUS/CHIP, MDS-SF3B1, and MDS with biallelic TP53 mutations were almost identically represented in both systems in our cohort. A case of MDS-MLD was reclassified as CMML by both classification systems. There are few but important differences between the new MDS classification systems. A preimplementation assessment is helpful to identify diagnostic and potential clinical impacts of their adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hematopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hematopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-023-00538-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hematopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-023-00538-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际共识分类(ICC)和世界卫生组织(WHO)建议在 2022 年对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的诊断标准进行重大修改。这些标准对血液病理学实践的影响尚不确定。本研究旨在评估 2022 年 ICC 和 WHO 第 5 版分类对细胞减少症和 MDS 诊断的影响。根据新的分类系统,对 2021 年进行初诊的细胞减少症/MDS 病例及其临床、实验室和病理结果进行了回顾和分类。确定了诊断的重大变化率,并调查了诊断方法、实验室工作流程和临床沟通挑战中的潜在隐患。共招募了 49 个病例。18/49(37%)的病例根据世界卫生组织第五版对诊断实体进行了重大修改,23/49(47%)的病例根据国际协调委员会进行了分类。造成这一差异的原因是有五例MDS-EB2(WHO第4版修订版)在ICC中被归类为MDS/AML(重大改变),而在WHO第5版中则无重大改变(MDS-IB2)。根据这两种系统,MDS-SLD病例均未进行重大重新分类。在我们的队列中,CCUS/CHIP、MDS-SF3B1和双倍TP53突变的MDS等新的分子定义类别在两种系统中的比例几乎相同。有一例 MDS-MLD 被两种分类系统重新分类为 CMML。新的 MDS 分类系统之间的差异很少,但都很重要。实施前的评估有助于确定采用这两种分类系统对诊断和潜在临床的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The new WHO and ICC classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes and their impact on the clinical laboratory.

The new WHO and ICC classification systems for myelodysplastic syndromes and their impact on the clinical laboratory.

The International Consensus Classification (ICC) and World Health Organization (WHO) proposed significant changes to the diagnostic criteria of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in 2022. The impact of these criteria on hematopathology practice is uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the 2022 ICC and WHO 5th edition classifications on the diagnosis of cytopenias and MDS. Cases from 2021 performed for primary diagnosis of cytopenia(s)/MDS and their clinical, laboratory, and pathologic findings were reviewed and classified according to the new classification systems. The rate of major changes to the diagnosis was determined and potential pitfalls in the diagnostic approach, laboratory workflow, and clinical communication challenges were investigated. A total of 49 cases were recruited. Major changes to the diagnostic entities were made in 18/49 (37%) cases according to the WHO 5th edition, and 23/49 (47%) cases classified according to the ICC. The difference was accounted for by five cases of MDS-EB2 (revised WHO 4th edition) classified as MDS/AML (major change) in the ICC in contrast to no significant change (MDS-IB2) in the WHO 5th edition. MDS-SLD cases were not subject to major reclassification according to either system. The new molecularly defined categories of CCUS/CHIP, MDS-SF3B1, and MDS with biallelic TP53 mutations were almost identically represented in both systems in our cohort. A case of MDS-MLD was reclassified as CMML by both classification systems. There are few but important differences between the new MDS classification systems. A preimplementation assessment is helpful to identify diagnostic and potential clinical impacts of their adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hematopathology
Journal of Hematopathology HEMATOLOGYPATHOLOGY-PATHOLOGY
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hematopathology aims at providing pathologists with a special interest in hematopathology with all the information needed to perform modern pathology in evaluating lymphoid tissues and bone marrow. To this end the journal publishes reviews, editorials, comments, original papers, guidelines and protocols, papers on ancillary techniques, and occasional case reports in the fields of the pathology, molecular biology, and clinical features of diseases of the hematopoietic system. The journal is the unique reference point for all pathologists with an interest in hematopathology. Molecular biologists involved in the expanding field of molecular diagnostics and research on lymphomas and leukemia benefit from the journal, too. Furthermore, the journal is of major interest for hematologists dealing with patients suffering from lymphomas, leukemias, and other diseases. The journal is unique in its true international character. Especially in the field of hematopathology it is clear that there are huge geographical variations in incidence of diseases. This is not only locally relevant, but due to globalization, relevant for all those involved in the management of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信