保罗·克劳斯，理查德·沃尔泽和盖伦网。蒂姆。

IF 0.1 2区哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Arabic Sciences and Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1017/s0957423921000072

Aileen R. Das

{"title":"保罗·克劳斯，理查德·沃尔泽和盖伦网。蒂姆。","authors":"Aileen R. Das","doi":"10.1017/s0957423921000072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A key work for the study of pre-modern Platonism, Galen's (d. ca. 217 CE) “Synopsis of Plato's Timaeus” (Com. Tim.) is served solely by an “imperfect” 1951 edition that presents for the first time the surviving Arabic text and translates it into Latin. The editors of the “Plato Arabus” series of the Corpus Platonicum, to which the edition belongs, blamed its flaws on the untimely death of Paul Kraus (1904-1944), who prepared the edition with another Jewish refugee Richard Walzer (1900-1975) around WWII. My analysis of archival sources will demonstrate that the labor on the volume was disproportionately Kraus’, whom Walzer and the Corpus Platonicum editor Raymond Klibansky (1905-2005) marginalized from the project in their attempts to secure employment in British academia as displaced Jews. I will also consider how Walzer and Klibansky re-envisioned Kraus’ plans for a Semitic corpus of Platonism to a narrower “Plato Arabus” that would align with a study of Latin Platonism (“Plato Latinus”) in which they presumed their British patrons would be more interested.","PeriodicalId":43433,"journal":{"name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"51 9","pages":"225 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PAUL KRAUS, RICHARD WALZER, AND GALEN'S COM. TIM.\",\"authors\":\"Aileen R. Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0957423921000072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A key work for the study of pre-modern Platonism, Galen's (d. ca. 217 CE) “Synopsis of Plato's Timaeus” (Com. Tim.) is served solely by an “imperfect” 1951 edition that presents for the first time the surviving Arabic text and translates it into Latin. The editors of the “Plato Arabus” series of the Corpus Platonicum, to which the edition belongs, blamed its flaws on the untimely death of Paul Kraus (1904-1944), who prepared the edition with another Jewish refugee Richard Walzer (1900-1975) around WWII. My analysis of archival sources will demonstrate that the labor on the volume was disproportionately Kraus’, whom Walzer and the Corpus Platonicum editor Raymond Klibansky (1905-2005) marginalized from the project in their attempts to secure employment in British academia as displaced Jews. I will also consider how Walzer and Klibansky re-envisioned Kraus’ plans for a Semitic corpus of Platonism to a narrower “Plato Arabus” that would align with a study of Latin Platonism (“Plato Latinus”) in which they presumed their British patrons would be more interested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"51 9\",\"pages\":\"225 - 256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0957423921000072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0957423921000072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

抽象的关键工作前现代的柏拉图主义的研究,盖伦(d . ca。公元217年)的“柏拉图的《蒂迈欧篇简介”(Com。1951年的版本“不完美”，首次呈现了现存的阿拉伯语文本，并将其翻译成拉丁语。该版本所属的《柏拉图文集》(Corpus Platonicum)“Plato Arabus”系列的编辑将其缺陷归咎于保罗•克劳斯(Paul Kraus, 1904-1944)的过早去世。克劳斯与另一位犹太难民理查德•沃尔泽(Richard Walzer, 1900-1975)在二战前后共同编写了该版本。我对档案资料的分析将证明，本书中的劳动不成比例地属于克劳斯，沃尔泽和《柏拉图文集》的编辑雷蒙德·克利班斯基(Raymond Klibansky, 1905-2005)在试图以流离失所的犹太人身份在英国学术界获得就业时，将克劳斯从这个项目中边缘化。我还将考虑沃尔泽和Klibansky如何重新设想克劳斯的计划，将柏拉图主义的闪米特语料库变成一个更狭窄的“柏拉图阿拉伯”，这将与拉丁柏拉图主义的研究(“柏拉图拉丁”)保持一致，他们认为他们的英国赞助人会对此更感兴趣。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

PAUL KRAUS, RICHARD WALZER, AND GALEN'S COM. TIM.

Abstract A key work for the study of pre-modern Platonism, Galen's (d. ca. 217 CE) “Synopsis of Plato's Timaeus” (Com. Tim.) is served solely by an “imperfect” 1951 edition that presents for the first time the surviving Arabic text and translates it into Latin. The editors of the “Plato Arabus” series of the Corpus Platonicum, to which the edition belongs, blamed its flaws on the untimely death of Paul Kraus (1904-1944), who prepared the edition with another Jewish refugee Richard Walzer (1900-1975) around WWII. My analysis of archival sources will demonstrate that the labor on the volume was disproportionately Kraus’, whom Walzer and the Corpus Platonicum editor Raymond Klibansky (1905-2005) marginalized from the project in their attempts to secure employment in British academia as displaced Jews. I will also consider how Walzer and Klibansky re-envisioned Kraus’ plans for a Semitic corpus of Platonism to a narrower “Plato Arabus” that would align with a study of Latin Platonism (“Plato Latinus”) in which they presumed their British patrons would be more interested.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Arabic Sciences and Philosophy Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Arabic Sciences and Philosophy (ASP) is an international journal devoted to the Arabic sciences, mathematics and philosophy in the world of Islam between the eighth and eighteenth centuries, in a cross-cultural context. In 2009, the journal extended its scope to include important papers on scientific modernization from the nineteenth century in the Islamic world. Together with original studies on the history of all these fields, ASP also offers work on the inter-relations between Arabic and Greek, Indian, Chinese, Latin, Byzantine, Syriac and Hebrew sciences and philosophy. Casting new light on the growth of these disciplines, as well as on the social and ideological context in which this growth took place, ASP is essential reading for those interested in these areas.