使用ICOPE监测应用程序自我筛查内在能力障碍的可靠性

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
E Gonzalez-Bautista, P de Souto Barreto, N Tavassoli, C Ranarijhon, J S Pons, Y Rolland, S Andrieu, J Delrieu
{"title":"使用ICOPE监测应用程序自我筛查内在能力障碍的可靠性","authors":"E Gonzalez-Bautista, P de Souto Barreto, N Tavassoli, C Ranarijhon, J S Pons, Y Rolland, S Andrieu, J Delrieu","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2023.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To verify the inter-rater agreement of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) STEP 1 screening tool using the ICOPE Monitor app, comparing self-assessment to a screening performed by a health professional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the results of the ICOPE Step 1 obtained by self-screening with those obtained by a professional screening using Gwet's agreement coefficient in two studies. Study 1 tested inter-rater reliability in participants to the INSPIRE-T cohort who agreed to undergo the self-and the professional screening on the same day. Study 2 used data from the INSPIRE-ICOPE care cohort. We included real-life users of the French health system whose first ICOPE Step 1 was a self-assessment followed by a professional Step 1within 130 days (mean=76 days, SD=60).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 included 79 participants (45 aged less than 60, 34 aged 60 and over, 60% female, mean (SD) age of 54.5 (18.5) years). Of the 207 participants in Study 2, 49 were less than 60, and 158 were 60 and over (54% female, mean (SD) age 67 (16.1) years). Agreement coefficients in Study 1 ranged from 0.49 (CI95% 0.24; 0.66) in the cognition domain - moderate agreement) to 0.99 (CI95% 0.96;1.00) in the nutrition domain - very good agreement); and in Study 2 from 0.36 (CI95% 0.23;0.49) in the cognition domain to 0.97 (95% 0.95;1.00) in the nutrition domain. The agreement coefficients for the cognition and hearing domains were higher for the participants aged <60 than those aged 60 and over. The time orientation items (cognition) showed high reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study supports using ICOPE Step 1 as a self-assessment screening tool. High reliability was found for intrinsic capacity's nutrition, psychological, and locomotion domains, regardless of age. We discuss aspects of the self-assessment of cognition, vision, and hearing domains when using the ICOPE monitor app in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Self-Screening for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments Using the ICOPE Monitor App.\",\"authors\":\"E Gonzalez-Bautista, P de Souto Barreto, N Tavassoli, C Ranarijhon, J S Pons, Y Rolland, S Andrieu, J Delrieu\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jfa.2023.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To verify the inter-rater agreement of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) STEP 1 screening tool using the ICOPE Monitor app, comparing self-assessment to a screening performed by a health professional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the results of the ICOPE Step 1 obtained by self-screening with those obtained by a professional screening using Gwet's agreement coefficient in two studies. Study 1 tested inter-rater reliability in participants to the INSPIRE-T cohort who agreed to undergo the self-and the professional screening on the same day. Study 2 used data from the INSPIRE-ICOPE care cohort. We included real-life users of the French health system whose first ICOPE Step 1 was a self-assessment followed by a professional Step 1within 130 days (mean=76 days, SD=60).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 included 79 participants (45 aged less than 60, 34 aged 60 and over, 60% female, mean (SD) age of 54.5 (18.5) years). Of the 207 participants in Study 2, 49 were less than 60, and 158 were 60 and over (54% female, mean (SD) age 67 (16.1) years). Agreement coefficients in Study 1 ranged from 0.49 (CI95% 0.24; 0.66) in the cognition domain - moderate agreement) to 0.99 (CI95% 0.96;1.00) in the nutrition domain - very good agreement); and in Study 2 from 0.36 (CI95% 0.23;0.49) in the cognition domain to 0.97 (95% 0.95;1.00) in the nutrition domain. The agreement coefficients for the cognition and hearing domains were higher for the participants aged <60 than those aged 60 and over. The time orientation items (cognition) showed high reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study supports using ICOPE Step 1 as a self-assessment screening tool. High reliability was found for intrinsic capacity's nutrition, psychological, and locomotion domains, regardless of age. We discuss aspects of the self-assessment of cognition, vision, and hearing domains when using the ICOPE monitor app in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证使用ICOPE Monitor应用程序的老年人综合护理(ICOPE)第1步筛查工具的评分者之间的一致性,将自我评估与健康专业人员进行的筛查进行比较。方法:在两项研究中,我们将自我筛选获得的ICOPE第1步结果与使用Gwet一致系数进行专业筛选获得的结果进行比较。研究1测试了INSPIRE-T队列参与者的内部信度,这些参与者同意在同一天接受自我和专业筛查。研究2使用的数据来自INSPIRE-ICOPE护理队列。我们纳入了法国卫生系统的真实用户,他们的第一个ICOPE第1步是自我评估,随后是130天内的专业第1步(平均=76天,SD=60)。结果:研究1纳入79名参与者(60岁以下45名,60岁及以上34名,60%为女性,平均(SD)年龄54.5(18.5)岁)。在研究2的207名参与者中,49名小于60岁,158名60岁及以上(54%为女性,平均(SD)年龄为67(16.1)岁)。研究1的一致系数为0.49 (CI95% 0.24;在认知领域(0.66)-中等一致性)到营养领域(0.99 (CI95% 0.96;1.00) -非常好的一致性);在研究2中,认知领域的得分从0.36 (CI95% 0.23;0.49)上升到0.97(95% 0.95;1.00)。结论:本研究支持使用ICOPE第1步作为自我评估筛选工具。内在能力的营养、心理和运动领域的可靠性与年龄无关。我们讨论了在老年人中使用ICOPE监测应用程序时对认知、视觉和听力领域的自我评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Self-Screening for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments Using the ICOPE Monitor App.

Aim: To verify the inter-rater agreement of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) STEP 1 screening tool using the ICOPE Monitor app, comparing self-assessment to a screening performed by a health professional.

Methods: We compared the results of the ICOPE Step 1 obtained by self-screening with those obtained by a professional screening using Gwet's agreement coefficient in two studies. Study 1 tested inter-rater reliability in participants to the INSPIRE-T cohort who agreed to undergo the self-and the professional screening on the same day. Study 2 used data from the INSPIRE-ICOPE care cohort. We included real-life users of the French health system whose first ICOPE Step 1 was a self-assessment followed by a professional Step 1within 130 days (mean=76 days, SD=60).

Results: Study 1 included 79 participants (45 aged less than 60, 34 aged 60 and over, 60% female, mean (SD) age of 54.5 (18.5) years). Of the 207 participants in Study 2, 49 were less than 60, and 158 were 60 and over (54% female, mean (SD) age 67 (16.1) years). Agreement coefficients in Study 1 ranged from 0.49 (CI95% 0.24; 0.66) in the cognition domain - moderate agreement) to 0.99 (CI95% 0.96;1.00) in the nutrition domain - very good agreement); and in Study 2 from 0.36 (CI95% 0.23;0.49) in the cognition domain to 0.97 (95% 0.95;1.00) in the nutrition domain. The agreement coefficients for the cognition and hearing domains were higher for the participants aged <60 than those aged 60 and over. The time orientation items (cognition) showed high reliability.

Conclusion: Our study supports using ICOPE Step 1 as a self-assessment screening tool. High reliability was found for intrinsic capacity's nutrition, psychological, and locomotion domains, regardless of age. We discuss aspects of the self-assessment of cognition, vision, and hearing domains when using the ICOPE monitor app in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信