{"title":"Student t检验在临床实验室内部质量控制中的应用","authors":"Feng Yang-chun , Huang Yan-chun , Ma Xiu-min","doi":"10.1016/j.flm.2017.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>James O. Westgard advised that the relation between internal quality control (IQC) and statistical methods, such as <em>t</em>-test, should be seriously considered. The results of IQC fully fit in the requirements of the <em>t</em>-test. But there was no research on analyzing the results of IQC by <em>t</em>-test. So the study aimed to explore the value of <em>t</em>-test for IQC by analyzing a specific example.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The results of IQC about luteotropichormone (LH) were collected in July 2015 in two instruments from a clinical laboratory as a specific example. The pre-determined target value of IQC was evaluated by a one-sample <em>t</em>-test first. Then the consistency of two instruments was analyzed by comparing their results of IQC with two paired samples <em>t</em>-test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In middle LH level of No. 1 instrument, though there was no out-of-control IQC result, the difference between the mean of IQC results in July 2015 and the pre-determined target value was statistically significant (<em>t</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.311, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027). So it was earlier to find whether the pre-determined target value was inappropriate by using a one-sample <em>t</em>-test when no out-of-control results appeared in the traditional IQC chart. For high LH level, the difference between the IQC results of two instruments was statistically significant (<em>t</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.435, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.020) in July 2015, so it was helpful to discover the inconsistency of two instruments by analyzing their IQC results with two paired samples <em>t</em>-test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The one-sample <em>t</em>-test was helpful to guide the correction of pre-determined target value of IQC. Two paired samples <em>t</em>-test was beneficial to improve consistency between two instruments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100555,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 125-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.flm.2017.09.002","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The application of Student’s t-test in internal quality control of clinical laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Feng Yang-chun , Huang Yan-chun , Ma Xiu-min\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.flm.2017.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>James O. Westgard advised that the relation between internal quality control (IQC) and statistical methods, such as <em>t</em>-test, should be seriously considered. The results of IQC fully fit in the requirements of the <em>t</em>-test. But there was no research on analyzing the results of IQC by <em>t</em>-test. So the study aimed to explore the value of <em>t</em>-test for IQC by analyzing a specific example.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The results of IQC about luteotropichormone (LH) were collected in July 2015 in two instruments from a clinical laboratory as a specific example. The pre-determined target value of IQC was evaluated by a one-sample <em>t</em>-test first. Then the consistency of two instruments was analyzed by comparing their results of IQC with two paired samples <em>t</em>-test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In middle LH level of No. 1 instrument, though there was no out-of-control IQC result, the difference between the mean of IQC results in July 2015 and the pre-determined target value was statistically significant (<em>t</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.311, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027). So it was earlier to find whether the pre-determined target value was inappropriate by using a one-sample <em>t</em>-test when no out-of-control results appeared in the traditional IQC chart. For high LH level, the difference between the IQC results of two instruments was statistically significant (<em>t</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.435, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.020) in July 2015, so it was helpful to discover the inconsistency of two instruments by analyzing their IQC results with two paired samples <em>t</em>-test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The one-sample <em>t</em>-test was helpful to guide the correction of pre-determined target value of IQC. Two paired samples <em>t</em>-test was beneficial to improve consistency between two instruments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 125-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.flm.2017.09.002\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542364917300948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542364917300948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The application of Student’s t-test in internal quality control of clinical laboratory
Background
James O. Westgard advised that the relation between internal quality control (IQC) and statistical methods, such as t-test, should be seriously considered. The results of IQC fully fit in the requirements of the t-test. But there was no research on analyzing the results of IQC by t-test. So the study aimed to explore the value of t-test for IQC by analyzing a specific example.
Methods
The results of IQC about luteotropichormone (LH) were collected in July 2015 in two instruments from a clinical laboratory as a specific example. The pre-determined target value of IQC was evaluated by a one-sample t-test first. Then the consistency of two instruments was analyzed by comparing their results of IQC with two paired samples t-test.
Results
In middle LH level of No. 1 instrument, though there was no out-of-control IQC result, the difference between the mean of IQC results in July 2015 and the pre-determined target value was statistically significant (t = 2.311, p = 0.027). So it was earlier to find whether the pre-determined target value was inappropriate by using a one-sample t-test when no out-of-control results appeared in the traditional IQC chart. For high LH level, the difference between the IQC results of two instruments was statistically significant (t = 2.435, p = 0.020) in July 2015, so it was helpful to discover the inconsistency of two instruments by analyzing their IQC results with two paired samples t-test.
Conclusions
The one-sample t-test was helpful to guide the correction of pre-determined target value of IQC. Two paired samples t-test was beneficial to improve consistency between two instruments.