{"title":"哀悼阶段并不存在","authors":"Alain Sauteraud","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcc.2018.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Starting in the 1960s, the knowledge about grief centered on the existence of specific stages of grief to better understand the phenomenon. This theory was based on two hypotheses: the sequential appearance of specific affective states; shock and denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptation; theses states will consistently appear in an invariable order. Data from many studies have not provided consistent support for this model; and this for at least two major reasons. Firstly, emotional states linked to grief are variable and non-specific. No emotional state is essential to define grief except strong yearning. Secondly, if they do appear, these affective states often overlap, and may subside and return spontaneously in a different order, thus refuting the notion of a stage theory. The current article makes the case for no longer teaching the stages of grief, aside from a historical perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100746,"journal":{"name":"Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 93-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jtcc.2018.02.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Les stades de deuil n’existent pas\",\"authors\":\"Alain Sauteraud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcc.2018.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Starting in the 1960s, the knowledge about grief centered on the existence of specific stages of grief to better understand the phenomenon. This theory was based on two hypotheses: the sequential appearance of specific affective states; shock and denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptation; theses states will consistently appear in an invariable order. Data from many studies have not provided consistent support for this model; and this for at least two major reasons. Firstly, emotional states linked to grief are variable and non-specific. No emotional state is essential to define grief except strong yearning. Secondly, if they do appear, these affective states often overlap, and may subside and return spontaneously in a different order, thus refuting the notion of a stage theory. The current article makes the case for no longer teaching the stages of grief, aside from a historical perspective.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jtcc.2018.02.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1155170418300259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1155170418300259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Starting in the 1960s, the knowledge about grief centered on the existence of specific stages of grief to better understand the phenomenon. This theory was based on two hypotheses: the sequential appearance of specific affective states; shock and denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptation; theses states will consistently appear in an invariable order. Data from many studies have not provided consistent support for this model; and this for at least two major reasons. Firstly, emotional states linked to grief are variable and non-specific. No emotional state is essential to define grief except strong yearning. Secondly, if they do appear, these affective states often overlap, and may subside and return spontaneously in a different order, thus refuting the notion of a stage theory. The current article makes the case for no longer teaching the stages of grief, aside from a historical perspective.