成人急性心理健康环境中的感觉加工偏好:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Stacia Kozidis, Jessica Jacobson
{"title":"成人急性心理健康环境中的感觉加工偏好:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Stacia Kozidis, Jessica Jacobson","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2023.050270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sensory processing patterns may inform mental health diagnosis-specific treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare sensory processing preferences of patients admitted with depression and substance use disorder diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute inpatient mental health center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients ages 18 to 64 yr with a primary diagnosis of depression or substance use disorder who completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Comparison of AASP quadrant scores between subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 211; M age = 33.8 yr) had a primary diagnosis of depression (n = 121; 57%) or substance use disorder (n = 90; 43%). The depression and substance use disorder groups yielded the following AASP quadrant scores, respectively: low registration, Ms = 38.2 and 34.3 (SDs = 9.4 and 8.0), p = .002; sensation seeking, Ms = 46.8 and 50.6 (SDs = 8.1 and 9.1), p = .002; sensory sensitivity, Ms = 43.4 and 39.8 (SDs = 10.3 and 9.9), p = .013; and sensation avoiding, Ms = 45.6 and 40.1 (SDs = 9.5 and 10.3), p < .001. These differences persisted when scores were normalized against standard population scores. The majority with a primary diagnosis of depression ranked \"more/much more than most\" for low registration (69; 57.0%), sensory sensitivity (61; 50.4%), and sensation avoiding (79; 65.3%). Those with a primary diagnosis of SUD ranked most frequently as \"similar to most\" in all quadrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Sensory processing preferences differ by primary mental health diagnosis and may provide insight into treatment planning. What This Article Adds: This study identifies differences in sensory processing between patients with a primary diagnosis of depression and those with a primary diagnosis of substance use disorder, suggesting that clinical interventions should account for sensory preferences. Providing appropriate sensory experiences (sensory room, sensory boxes, etc.) may allow patients to function at an optimal level by improving their ability to self-regulate emotions and behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensory Processing Preferences in an Adult Acute Mental Health Setting: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stacia Kozidis, Jessica Jacobson\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2023.050270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sensory processing patterns may inform mental health diagnosis-specific treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare sensory processing preferences of patients admitted with depression and substance use disorder diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute inpatient mental health center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients ages 18 to 64 yr with a primary diagnosis of depression or substance use disorder who completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Comparison of AASP quadrant scores between subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 211; M age = 33.8 yr) had a primary diagnosis of depression (n = 121; 57%) or substance use disorder (n = 90; 43%). The depression and substance use disorder groups yielded the following AASP quadrant scores, respectively: low registration, Ms = 38.2 and 34.3 (SDs = 9.4 and 8.0), p = .002; sensation seeking, Ms = 46.8 and 50.6 (SDs = 8.1 and 9.1), p = .002; sensory sensitivity, Ms = 43.4 and 39.8 (SDs = 10.3 and 9.9), p = .013; and sensation avoiding, Ms = 45.6 and 40.1 (SDs = 9.5 and 10.3), p < .001. These differences persisted when scores were normalized against standard population scores. The majority with a primary diagnosis of depression ranked \\\"more/much more than most\\\" for low registration (69; 57.0%), sensory sensitivity (61; 50.4%), and sensation avoiding (79; 65.3%). Those with a primary diagnosis of SUD ranked most frequently as \\\"similar to most\\\" in all quadrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Sensory processing preferences differ by primary mental health diagnosis and may provide insight into treatment planning. What This Article Adds: This study identifies differences in sensory processing between patients with a primary diagnosis of depression and those with a primary diagnosis of substance use disorder, suggesting that clinical interventions should account for sensory preferences. Providing appropriate sensory experiences (sensory room, sensory boxes, etc.) may allow patients to function at an optimal level by improving their ability to self-regulate emotions and behaviors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050270\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:感官处理模式可以为心理健康诊断提供具体的治疗计划。目的:比较抑郁症和物质使用障碍患者的感觉加工偏好。设计:回顾性队列研究。设置:急性住院精神卫生中心。参与者:年龄在18至64岁之间,主要诊断为抑郁症或物质使用障碍,并完成了青少年/成人感觉档案(AASP)。结果和测量:亚组间AASP象限评分的比较。结果:参与者(n=211;M年龄=33.8岁)的初级诊断为抑郁症(n=121;57%)或物质使用障碍(n=90;43%)。抑郁症和物质使用障碍组的AASP象限得分分别如下:低注册,Ms=38.2和34.3(SDs=9.4和8.0),p=0.002;感觉寻求,Ms=46.8和50.6(SDs=8.1和9.1),p=0.002;感官敏感性,Ms=43.4和39.8(SDs=10.3和9.9),p=0.013;和感觉回避,Ms=45.6和40.1(SDs=9.5和10.3),p<.001。当将分数与标准人群分数进行标准化时,这些差异仍然存在。大多数初级诊断为抑郁症的人在低登记率(69;57.0%)、感觉敏感度(61;50.4%)和感觉回避(79;65.3%)方面排名“比大多数人更多/多得多”。那些初级诊断为SUD的人在所有象限中最常排名为“与大多数人相似”。结论和相关性:感官处理偏好因初级心理健康诊断而异,可能为治疗计划提供见解。这篇文章补充道:这项研究确定了初级诊断为抑郁症的患者和初级诊断为物质使用障碍的患者在感觉处理方面的差异,表明临床干预应考虑到感觉偏好。提供适当的感官体验(感官室、感官箱等)可以通过提高患者自我调节情绪和行为的能力,使患者的功能达到最佳水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensory Processing Preferences in an Adult Acute Mental Health Setting: A Retrospective Study.

Importance: Sensory processing patterns may inform mental health diagnosis-specific treatment plans.

Objective: To compare sensory processing preferences of patients admitted with depression and substance use disorder diagnoses.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Acute inpatient mental health center.

Participants: Patients ages 18 to 64 yr with a primary diagnosis of depression or substance use disorder who completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP).

Outcomes and measures: Comparison of AASP quadrant scores between subgroups.

Results: Participants (n = 211; M age = 33.8 yr) had a primary diagnosis of depression (n = 121; 57%) or substance use disorder (n = 90; 43%). The depression and substance use disorder groups yielded the following AASP quadrant scores, respectively: low registration, Ms = 38.2 and 34.3 (SDs = 9.4 and 8.0), p = .002; sensation seeking, Ms = 46.8 and 50.6 (SDs = 8.1 and 9.1), p = .002; sensory sensitivity, Ms = 43.4 and 39.8 (SDs = 10.3 and 9.9), p = .013; and sensation avoiding, Ms = 45.6 and 40.1 (SDs = 9.5 and 10.3), p < .001. These differences persisted when scores were normalized against standard population scores. The majority with a primary diagnosis of depression ranked "more/much more than most" for low registration (69; 57.0%), sensory sensitivity (61; 50.4%), and sensation avoiding (79; 65.3%). Those with a primary diagnosis of SUD ranked most frequently as "similar to most" in all quadrants.

Conclusions and relevance: Sensory processing preferences differ by primary mental health diagnosis and may provide insight into treatment planning. What This Article Adds: This study identifies differences in sensory processing between patients with a primary diagnosis of depression and those with a primary diagnosis of substance use disorder, suggesting that clinical interventions should account for sensory preferences. Providing appropriate sensory experiences (sensory room, sensory boxes, etc.) may allow patients to function at an optimal level by improving their ability to self-regulate emotions and behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信