Quentin Pangot , François Labaste , Vincent Pey , Chloé Médrano , Adam Tuijnman , Stéphanie Ruiz , Jean-Marie Conil , Vincent Minville , Fanny Vardon-Bounes
{"title":"新冠肺炎和流感的比较:ICU的流行病学、临床特征、结果和死亡率。","authors":"Quentin Pangot , François Labaste , Vincent Pey , Chloé Médrano , Adam Tuijnman , Stéphanie Ruiz , Jean-Marie Conil , Vincent Minville , Fanny Vardon-Bounes","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale</h3><p>Several authors have compared COVID-19 infection with influenza in the ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the baseline clinical profiles, care procedures, and mortality outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, categorized by infection status (Influenza vs. COVID-19).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective observational study. Data were extracted from the Toulouse University Hospital from March 2014 to March 2021. To compare survival curves, we plotted the survival at Day-90 using the Kaplan-Meier curve and conducted a log-rank test. Additionally, we performed propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors between the COVID-19 and influenza groups. Furthermore, we use the CART model for multivariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 363 patients admitted to the ICU due to severe viral pneumonia: 152 patients (41.9 %) with influenza and 211 patients (58.1 %) with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, whereas influenza patients had significantly higher severity scores (SOFA: 10 [6–12] vs. 6 [3–9], <em>p</em><0.01 and SAPS II: 51 [35–67] vs. 37 [29–50], <em>p</em><0.001). Overall mortality rates were comparable between the two groups (27.6 % (<em>n</em> = 42) in the influenza group vs. 21.8 % (<em>n</em> = 46) in the COVID-19 group, <em>p</em>=NS). Mechanical ventilation was more commonly employed in the influenza group (76.3 % (<em>n</em> = 116) vs. 59.7 % (<em>n</em> = 126), <em>p</em><0.001); however, COVID-19 patients required longer durations of mechanical ventilation (18 [9–29] days vs. 13 [5–24] days, <em>p</em><0.006) and longer hospital stays (23 [13–34] days vs. 18.5 [9–34.5] days, <em>p</em> = 0.009). The CART analysis revealed that the use of extra renal replacement therapy was the most influential prognostic factor in the influenza group, while the PaO2/FiO2-PEEP ratio played a significant role in the COVID-19 group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite differences in clinical presentation and prognostic factors, the mortality rates at 90 days, after adjusting for confounding factors, were similar between COVID-19 and influenza patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 105600"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing COVID-19 and influenza: Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcomes and mortality in the ICU\",\"authors\":\"Quentin Pangot , François Labaste , Vincent Pey , Chloé Médrano , Adam Tuijnman , Stéphanie Ruiz , Jean-Marie Conil , Vincent Minville , Fanny Vardon-Bounes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale</h3><p>Several authors have compared COVID-19 infection with influenza in the ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the baseline clinical profiles, care procedures, and mortality outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, categorized by infection status (Influenza vs. COVID-19).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective observational study. Data were extracted from the Toulouse University Hospital from March 2014 to March 2021. To compare survival curves, we plotted the survival at Day-90 using the Kaplan-Meier curve and conducted a log-rank test. Additionally, we performed propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors between the COVID-19 and influenza groups. Furthermore, we use the CART model for multivariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 363 patients admitted to the ICU due to severe viral pneumonia: 152 patients (41.9 %) with influenza and 211 patients (58.1 %) with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, whereas influenza patients had significantly higher severity scores (SOFA: 10 [6–12] vs. 6 [3–9], <em>p</em><0.01 and SAPS II: 51 [35–67] vs. 37 [29–50], <em>p</em><0.001). Overall mortality rates were comparable between the two groups (27.6 % (<em>n</em> = 42) in the influenza group vs. 21.8 % (<em>n</em> = 46) in the COVID-19 group, <em>p</em>=NS). Mechanical ventilation was more commonly employed in the influenza group (76.3 % (<em>n</em> = 116) vs. 59.7 % (<em>n</em> = 126), <em>p</em><0.001); however, COVID-19 patients required longer durations of mechanical ventilation (18 [9–29] days vs. 13 [5–24] days, <em>p</em><0.006) and longer hospital stays (23 [13–34] days vs. 18.5 [9–34.5] days, <em>p</em> = 0.009). The CART analysis revealed that the use of extra renal replacement therapy was the most influential prognostic factor in the influenza group, while the PaO2/FiO2-PEEP ratio played a significant role in the COVID-19 group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite differences in clinical presentation and prognostic factors, the mortality rates at 90 days, after adjusting for confounding factors, were similar between COVID-19 and influenza patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653223002238\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653223002238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing COVID-19 and influenza: Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcomes and mortality in the ICU
Rationale
Several authors have compared COVID-19 infection with influenza in the ICU.
Objective
This study aimed to compare the baseline clinical profiles, care procedures, and mortality outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, categorized by infection status (Influenza vs. COVID-19).
Methods
Retrospective observational study. Data were extracted from the Toulouse University Hospital from March 2014 to March 2021. To compare survival curves, we plotted the survival at Day-90 using the Kaplan-Meier curve and conducted a log-rank test. Additionally, we performed propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors between the COVID-19 and influenza groups. Furthermore, we use the CART model for multivariate analysis.
Results
The study included 363 patients admitted to the ICU due to severe viral pneumonia: 152 patients (41.9 %) with influenza and 211 patients (58.1 %) with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, whereas influenza patients had significantly higher severity scores (SOFA: 10 [6–12] vs. 6 [3–9], p<0.01 and SAPS II: 51 [35–67] vs. 37 [29–50], p<0.001). Overall mortality rates were comparable between the two groups (27.6 % (n = 42) in the influenza group vs. 21.8 % (n = 46) in the COVID-19 group, p=NS). Mechanical ventilation was more commonly employed in the influenza group (76.3 % (n = 116) vs. 59.7 % (n = 126), p<0.001); however, COVID-19 patients required longer durations of mechanical ventilation (18 [9–29] days vs. 13 [5–24] days, p<0.006) and longer hospital stays (23 [13–34] days vs. 18.5 [9–34.5] days, p = 0.009). The CART analysis revealed that the use of extra renal replacement therapy was the most influential prognostic factor in the influenza group, while the PaO2/FiO2-PEEP ratio played a significant role in the COVID-19 group.
Conclusions
Despite differences in clinical presentation and prognostic factors, the mortality rates at 90 days, after adjusting for confounding factors, were similar between COVID-19 and influenza patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice.
The journal publishes on topics that include:
• new diagnostic technologies
• nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing
• targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing
• emerging pandemic viral threats
• respiratory viruses
• transplant viruses
• chronic viral infections
• cancer-associated viruses
• gastrointestinal viruses
• central nervous system viruses
• one health (excludes animal health)