破除模糊的政策目标概念:克罗地亚公共政策比较

IF 2.7 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Ana Petek, Nikola Baketa, Anka Kekez, Marko Kovačić, Mario Munta, Krešimir Petković, Marjeta Šinko, Borna Zgurić
{"title":"破除模糊的政策目标概念:克罗地亚公共政策比较","authors":"Ana Petek,&nbsp;Nikola Baketa,&nbsp;Anka Kekez,&nbsp;Marko Kovačić,&nbsp;Mario Munta,&nbsp;Krešimir Petković,&nbsp;Marjeta Šinko,&nbsp;Borna Zgurić","doi":"10.1002/epa2.1106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims at empirically improving public policy theory by unfolding the concept of policy goals and contributing to their classifications. The research focuses on the thematic dimension of policy goals and investigates 11 Croatian governmental strategies using qualitative content analysis. The research identifies original policy goal types and classifies them into sector-, process-, evaluation-, instrument-, and value-oriented goals. Article concludes with a more comprehensive definition of policy goals, as governmental statements about desired futures in relation to specific sectoral purposes, values, and principles in democratic political systems, policymaking process improvements, necessary instrumental innovations, and evaluation standards that should be fulfilled. The application of this definition and developed goals’ classification reveals that elements of policy-process theories, evaluation research, policy design theory and instrument analysis, democracy theory, and sector-specific research need to be synthesized to better understand the concept of policy goals and to advance their research.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"451-469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1106","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unboxing the vague notion of policy goals: Comparison of Croatian public policies\",\"authors\":\"Ana Petek,&nbsp;Nikola Baketa,&nbsp;Anka Kekez,&nbsp;Marko Kovačić,&nbsp;Mario Munta,&nbsp;Krešimir Petković,&nbsp;Marjeta Šinko,&nbsp;Borna Zgurić\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epa2.1106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aims at empirically improving public policy theory by unfolding the concept of policy goals and contributing to their classifications. The research focuses on the thematic dimension of policy goals and investigates 11 Croatian governmental strategies using qualitative content analysis. The research identifies original policy goal types and classifies them into sector-, process-, evaluation-, instrument-, and value-oriented goals. Article concludes with a more comprehensive definition of policy goals, as governmental statements about desired futures in relation to specific sectoral purposes, values, and principles in democratic political systems, policymaking process improvements, necessary instrumental innovations, and evaluation standards that should be fulfilled. The application of this definition and developed goals’ classification reveals that elements of policy-process theories, evaluation research, policy design theory and instrument analysis, democracy theory, and sector-specific research need to be synthesized to better understand the concept of policy goals and to advance their research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Policy Analysis\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"451-469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1106\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Policy Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究旨在通过展开政策目标的概念并对其分类做出贡献,实证地改进公共政策理论。本研究侧重于政策目标的主题层面,并采用定性内容分析法调查了克罗地亚政府的11项战略。研究确定了最初的政策目标类型,并将其分为部门目标、过程目标、评估目标、工具目标和价值导向目标。文章最后对政策目标进行了更全面的定义,即政府关于民主政治制度中特定部门目的、价值观和原则的预期未来的声明、政策制定过程的改进、必要的工具创新和应满足的评估标准。这一定义和发展目标分类的应用表明,需要综合政策过程理论、评估研究、政策设计理论和工具分析、民主理论和具体部门研究的要素,以更好地理解政策目标的概念并推进其研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unboxing the vague notion of policy goals: Comparison of Croatian public policies

This study aims at empirically improving public policy theory by unfolding the concept of policy goals and contributing to their classifications. The research focuses on the thematic dimension of policy goals and investigates 11 Croatian governmental strategies using qualitative content analysis. The research identifies original policy goal types and classifies them into sector-, process-, evaluation-, instrument-, and value-oriented goals. Article concludes with a more comprehensive definition of policy goals, as governmental statements about desired futures in relation to specific sectoral purposes, values, and principles in democratic political systems, policymaking process improvements, necessary instrumental innovations, and evaluation standards that should be fulfilled. The application of this definition and developed goals’ classification reveals that elements of policy-process theories, evaluation research, policy design theory and instrument analysis, democracy theory, and sector-specific research need to be synthesized to better understand the concept of policy goals and to advance their research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Policy Analysis
European Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信