Pere García-Rodríguez, Javier Pecci, Sergio Vázquez-González, Helios Pareja-Galeano
{"title":"血流量限制训练对前交叉韧带重建体力活动患者的急性和慢性影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Pere García-Rodríguez, Javier Pecci, Sergio Vázquez-González, Helios Pareja-Galeano","doi":"10.1177/19417381231208636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Muscle atrophy and loss of knee function are common findings after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Rehabilitation through blood flow restriction (BFR) has gained clinical relevance when combined with low loads to improve these disorders in recent years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the rehabilitation effectiveness of ACL reconstruction with the use of BFR on pain, functionality, strength, and muscle mass in physically active people.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE was performed on March 31, 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized clinical trials with active adults who underwent ACL surgery were included. They had to compare conventional treatments with the use of BFR, reporting values of pain, functionality, strength, or cross-sectional area (CSA). Articles whose participants presented concomitant injuries and whose intervention combined the use of BFR with treatments other than resistance training were excluded.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Study design, population, cuff pressure, and main outcomes including strength, quadriceps CSA, pain, and functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies out of a total of 389 were included (152 participants; 90 men and 62 women). These included studies showed no differences on CSA or strength when comparing BFR training with high loads exercise. BFR has demonstrated improvements in knee functionality and pain compared with other interventions such as immobilization or high loads training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of low loads combined with BFR improves pain, strength, functionality, and CSA. In addition, knee pain reduction and functionality are greater with BFR compared with the use of high loads or immobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"820-828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute and Chronic Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training in Physically Active Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Pere García-Rodríguez, Javier Pecci, Sergio Vázquez-González, Helios Pareja-Galeano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381231208636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Muscle atrophy and loss of knee function are common findings after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Rehabilitation through blood flow restriction (BFR) has gained clinical relevance when combined with low loads to improve these disorders in recent years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the rehabilitation effectiveness of ACL reconstruction with the use of BFR on pain, functionality, strength, and muscle mass in physically active people.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE was performed on March 31, 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized clinical trials with active adults who underwent ACL surgery were included. They had to compare conventional treatments with the use of BFR, reporting values of pain, functionality, strength, or cross-sectional area (CSA). Articles whose participants presented concomitant injuries and whose intervention combined the use of BFR with treatments other than resistance training were excluded.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Study design, population, cuff pressure, and main outcomes including strength, quadriceps CSA, pain, and functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies out of a total of 389 were included (152 participants; 90 men and 62 women). These included studies showed no differences on CSA or strength when comparing BFR training with high loads exercise. BFR has demonstrated improvements in knee functionality and pain compared with other interventions such as immobilization or high loads training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of low loads combined with BFR improves pain, strength, functionality, and CSA. In addition, knee pain reduction and functionality are greater with BFR compared with the use of high loads or immobilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"820-828\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346237/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231208636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231208636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肌肉萎缩和膝关节功能丧失是前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后的常见表现。近年来,通过血流限制(BFR)进行的康复与低负荷相结合以改善这些疾病,已获得临床意义。目的:评价BFR重建ACL对体力活动人群疼痛、功能、力量和肌肉质量的康复效果。数据来源:根据2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,于2023年3月31日对PubMed、Web of Science和MEDLINE进行了搜索。研究选择:包括对接受ACL手术的活跃成年人进行的随机临床试验。他们必须将传统治疗与BFR的使用进行比较,报告疼痛、功能、强度或截面积(CSA)的值。排除参与者出现伴随损伤的文章,以及将BFR的使用与阻力训练以外的治疗相结合的干预。研究设计:系统回顾。证据级别:2级。数据提取:研究设计、人群、袖带压力和主要结果,包括力量、股四头肌CSA、疼痛和功能。结果:389项研究中包括6项(152名参与者;90名男性和62名女性)。这些纳入的研究表明,当将BFR训练与高负荷运动进行比较时,CSA或力量没有差异。与其他干预措施(如固定或高负荷训练)相比,BFR已证明在膝关节功能和疼痛方面有所改善。结论:使用低负荷结合BFR可改善疼痛、力量、功能和CSA。此外,与使用高负荷或固定相比,BFR能更好地减轻膝盖疼痛和功能。
Acute and Chronic Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training in Physically Active Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Context: Muscle atrophy and loss of knee function are common findings after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Rehabilitation through blood flow restriction (BFR) has gained clinical relevance when combined with low loads to improve these disorders in recent years.
Objective: To evaluate the rehabilitation effectiveness of ACL reconstruction with the use of BFR on pain, functionality, strength, and muscle mass in physically active people.
Data sources: A search of PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE was performed on March 31, 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.
Study selection: Randomized clinical trials with active adults who underwent ACL surgery were included. They had to compare conventional treatments with the use of BFR, reporting values of pain, functionality, strength, or cross-sectional area (CSA). Articles whose participants presented concomitant injuries and whose intervention combined the use of BFR with treatments other than resistance training were excluded.
Study design: Systematic review.
Level of evidence: Level 2.
Data extraction: Study design, population, cuff pressure, and main outcomes including strength, quadriceps CSA, pain, and functionality.
Results: Six studies out of a total of 389 were included (152 participants; 90 men and 62 women). These included studies showed no differences on CSA or strength when comparing BFR training with high loads exercise. BFR has demonstrated improvements in knee functionality and pain compared with other interventions such as immobilization or high loads training.
Conclusion: The use of low loads combined with BFR improves pain, strength, functionality, and CSA. In addition, knee pain reduction and functionality are greater with BFR compared with the use of high loads or immobilization.
期刊介绍:
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals.
Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS).
The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor.
Topics include:
-Sports Injury and Treatment
-Care of the Athlete
-Athlete Rehabilitation
-Medical Issues in the Athlete
-Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine
-Case Studies in Sports Medicine
-Images in Sports Medicine
-Legal Issues
-Pediatric Athletes
-General Sports Trauma
-Sports Psychology