{"title":"半生理盐水灌注对温流控制消融损伤特征的影响。","authors":"Takashi Ikenouchi, Masateru Takigawa, Masahiko Goya, Junji Yamaguchi, Claire A Martin, Tasuku Yamamoto, Miho Negishi, Iwanari Kawamura, Kentaro Goto, Takatoshi Shigeta, Takuro Nishimura, Tomomasa Takamiya, Susumu Tao, Shinsuke Miyazaki, Tetsuo Sasano","doi":"10.1007/s10840-023-01678-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiofrequency (RF) ablation with half-normal saline (HNS) irrigation is reported to potentially enlarge local lesion compared to normal saline (NS) in power-controlled ablation (PC-Abl). However, the effect of HNS-irrigation in temperature-flow-controlled ablation (TFC-Abl) on lesion characteristics is unknown. We compared this between TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter and PC-Abl with Thermocool SmartTouch SF™ catheter (STSF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RF-application with NS (n = 480) and HNS (n = 480) irrigation were performed on swine myocardium placed in a circulating saline bath. Lesion characteristics without steam-pops under various conditions (target AI, 400/550; ablation power, 30/50 W; contact force, 10/20/30 g; catheter orientation, perpendicular/parallel) were assessed and compared between two irrigants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 343 lesions without steam-pops in each group were evaluated. In PC-Abl, lesion size did not differ between two groups (NS, 188 ± 97 vs. HNS, 200 ± 95 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.28 in volume; 33.9 ± 7.3 vs. 34.8 ± 9.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.34 in surface area; and 4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.0 mm, p = 0.81 in depth), but steam-pops were more frequently observed with HNS-irrigation (23.8% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.001). Contrary, in TFC-Abl, HNS-irrigation produced significantly larger (214 ± 106 vs. 243 ± 128 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.017) and deeper (4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 mm, p = 0.002) lesions without increasing the risk of steam-pops (15.0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.99). Automatic temperature-guided titration was more frequently observed in HNS-irrigation (54.8% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter utilizing HNS-irrigation might increase volume and depth of local lesion without increasing the risk of stem-pops compared to NS-irrigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of half-normal saline irrigation on lesion characteristics in temperature-flow-controlled ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Ikenouchi, Masateru Takigawa, Masahiko Goya, Junji Yamaguchi, Claire A Martin, Tasuku Yamamoto, Miho Negishi, Iwanari Kawamura, Kentaro Goto, Takatoshi Shigeta, Takuro Nishimura, Tomomasa Takamiya, Susumu Tao, Shinsuke Miyazaki, Tetsuo Sasano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-023-01678-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiofrequency (RF) ablation with half-normal saline (HNS) irrigation is reported to potentially enlarge local lesion compared to normal saline (NS) in power-controlled ablation (PC-Abl). However, the effect of HNS-irrigation in temperature-flow-controlled ablation (TFC-Abl) on lesion characteristics is unknown. We compared this between TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter and PC-Abl with Thermocool SmartTouch SF™ catheter (STSF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RF-application with NS (n = 480) and HNS (n = 480) irrigation were performed on swine myocardium placed in a circulating saline bath. Lesion characteristics without steam-pops under various conditions (target AI, 400/550; ablation power, 30/50 W; contact force, 10/20/30 g; catheter orientation, perpendicular/parallel) were assessed and compared between two irrigants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 343 lesions without steam-pops in each group were evaluated. In PC-Abl, lesion size did not differ between two groups (NS, 188 ± 97 vs. HNS, 200 ± 95 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.28 in volume; 33.9 ± 7.3 vs. 34.8 ± 9.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.34 in surface area; and 4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.0 mm, p = 0.81 in depth), but steam-pops were more frequently observed with HNS-irrigation (23.8% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.001). Contrary, in TFC-Abl, HNS-irrigation produced significantly larger (214 ± 106 vs. 243 ± 128 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.017) and deeper (4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 mm, p = 0.002) lesions without increasing the risk of steam-pops (15.0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.99). Automatic temperature-guided titration was more frequently observed in HNS-irrigation (54.8% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter utilizing HNS-irrigation might increase volume and depth of local lesion without increasing the risk of stem-pops compared to NS-irrigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01678-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01678-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of half-normal saline irrigation on lesion characteristics in temperature-flow-controlled ablation.
Purpose: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation with half-normal saline (HNS) irrigation is reported to potentially enlarge local lesion compared to normal saline (NS) in power-controlled ablation (PC-Abl). However, the effect of HNS-irrigation in temperature-flow-controlled ablation (TFC-Abl) on lesion characteristics is unknown. We compared this between TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter and PC-Abl with Thermocool SmartTouch SF™ catheter (STSF).
Methods: RF-application with NS (n = 480) and HNS (n = 480) irrigation were performed on swine myocardium placed in a circulating saline bath. Lesion characteristics without steam-pops under various conditions (target AI, 400/550; ablation power, 30/50 W; contact force, 10/20/30 g; catheter orientation, perpendicular/parallel) were assessed and compared between two irrigants.
Results: After matching, 343 lesions without steam-pops in each group were evaluated. In PC-Abl, lesion size did not differ between two groups (NS, 188 ± 97 vs. HNS, 200 ± 95 mm3, p = 0.28 in volume; 33.9 ± 7.3 vs. 34.8 ± 9.5 mm2, p = 0.34 in surface area; and 4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.0 mm, p = 0.81 in depth), but steam-pops were more frequently observed with HNS-irrigation (23.8% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.001). Contrary, in TFC-Abl, HNS-irrigation produced significantly larger (214 ± 106 vs. 243 ± 128 mm3, p = 0.017) and deeper (4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 mm, p = 0.002) lesions without increasing the risk of steam-pops (15.0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.99). Automatic temperature-guided titration was more frequently observed in HNS-irrigation (54.8% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter utilizing HNS-irrigation might increase volume and depth of local lesion without increasing the risk of stem-pops compared to NS-irrigation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.