C. Grimm, H. Schmidli, F. Bakker, K. Brown, P. Campbell, M. Candolfi, P. Chapman, E. G. Harrison, M. Mead-Briggs, R. Schmuck, A. Ufer
{"title":"用pyri伤寒和rhopalosiphi蚜的标准毒性试验建立剂量-反应关系","authors":"C. Grimm, H. Schmidli, F. Bakker, K. Brown, P. Campbell, M. Candolfi, P. Chapman, E. G. Harrison, M. Mead-Briggs, R. Schmuck, A. Ufer","doi":"10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.01013.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The existing standardised test systems for assessing the toxicity of crop protection products to the non-target arthropods <i>Typhlodromus pyri</i> (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and <i>Aphidius rhopalosiphi</i> (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) are limit tests designed to compare a single-use rate of the product with a water control. The suitability of these test systems for generating dose-response data as required for refined ecotoxicological risk assessment was evaluated. Data on dose-response toxicity of crop protection products to <i>T. pyri</i> and <i>A. rhopalosiphi</i> were generated under worst-case laboratory and to <i>T. pyri</i> under extended laboratory conditions and analysed using the standard Probit method, a logistic regression, a generalised Probit analysis, and the moving average-angle method in order to calculate the LR<sub>50</sub>-values (application rate killing 50 % of the exposed organisms). The fit of the models, the precision of the resulting LR<sub>50</sub> values, and the required minimum number of replicates were compared. In 85 % of the studies, at least one of the statistical methods led to satisfactory results. The moving average-angle method was the most widely applicable method. The results show that the existing guidelines can be used to perform dose-response tests. Implications for risk assessment are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100103,"journal":{"name":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.01013.x","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of standard toxicity tests with Typhlodromus pyri and Aphidius rhopalosiphi to establish a dose-response relationship\",\"authors\":\"C. Grimm, H. Schmidli, F. Bakker, K. Brown, P. Campbell, M. Candolfi, P. Chapman, E. G. Harrison, M. Mead-Briggs, R. Schmuck, A. Ufer\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.01013.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The existing standardised test systems for assessing the toxicity of crop protection products to the non-target arthropods <i>Typhlodromus pyri</i> (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and <i>Aphidius rhopalosiphi</i> (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) are limit tests designed to compare a single-use rate of the product with a water control. The suitability of these test systems for generating dose-response data as required for refined ecotoxicological risk assessment was evaluated. Data on dose-response toxicity of crop protection products to <i>T. pyri</i> and <i>A. rhopalosiphi</i> were generated under worst-case laboratory and to <i>T. pyri</i> under extended laboratory conditions and analysed using the standard Probit method, a logistic regression, a generalised Probit analysis, and the moving average-angle method in order to calculate the LR<sub>50</sub>-values (application rate killing 50 % of the exposed organisms). The fit of the models, the precision of the resulting LR<sub>50</sub> values, and the required minimum number of replicates were compared. In 85 % of the studies, at least one of the statistical methods led to satisfactory results. The moving average-angle method was the most widely applicable method. The results show that the existing guidelines can be used to perform dose-response tests. Implications for risk assessment are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.01013.x\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.01013.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.01013.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of standard toxicity tests with Typhlodromus pyri and Aphidius rhopalosiphi to establish a dose-response relationship
The existing standardised test systems for assessing the toxicity of crop protection products to the non-target arthropods Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Aphidius rhopalosiphi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) are limit tests designed to compare a single-use rate of the product with a water control. The suitability of these test systems for generating dose-response data as required for refined ecotoxicological risk assessment was evaluated. Data on dose-response toxicity of crop protection products to T. pyri and A. rhopalosiphi were generated under worst-case laboratory and to T. pyri under extended laboratory conditions and analysed using the standard Probit method, a logistic regression, a generalised Probit analysis, and the moving average-angle method in order to calculate the LR50-values (application rate killing 50 % of the exposed organisms). The fit of the models, the precision of the resulting LR50 values, and the required minimum number of replicates were compared. In 85 % of the studies, at least one of the statistical methods led to satisfactory results. The moving average-angle method was the most widely applicable method. The results show that the existing guidelines can be used to perform dose-response tests. Implications for risk assessment are discussed.