抑郁症认知行为治疗中的自我批评完美主义、依赖性和熵

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lance L. Hawley, Lance M. Rappaport, Christine A. Padesky, Steven D. Hollon, Enza Mancuso, Judith M. Laposa, Karen Brozina, Zindel V. Segal
{"title":"抑郁症认知行为治疗中的自我批评完美主义、依赖性和熵","authors":"Lance L. Hawley,&nbsp;Lance M. Rappaport,&nbsp;Christine A. Padesky,&nbsp;Steven D. Hollon,&nbsp;Enza Mancuso,&nbsp;Judith M. Laposa,&nbsp;Karen Brozina,&nbsp;Zindel V. Segal","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined whether ‘personality vulnerability’ (i.e., self-critical perfectionism or dependency) predicts the trajectory of change, as well as variability and instability (i.e., entropy) of symptoms, during cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Study participants were outpatients (<i>N </i>= 312) experiencing a primary mood disorder. Participants received CBT for depression group sessions over 15 weeks. Self-report measures of self-critical perfectionism, dependency, and depression were collected longitudinally.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A latent growth mixture modelling (LGMM) statistical approach was used to evaluate the presence of latent classes of individuals based on their longitudinal pattern of symptom change during CBT and to evaluate whether baseline self-critical perfectionism or dependency predicts class membership. A Latent Acceleration Score (LAS) model evaluated whether perfectionism or dependency led to variability in depression symptom change (e.g., velocity) by considering changes in velocity (e.g., acceleration and/or deceleration).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>LGMM indicated the presence of two latent classes that represent symptom improvement (<i>N </i>= 239) or minimal symptom improvement over time (<i>N </i>= 73). Elevated baseline self-critical perfectionism, but not dependency, predicted a greater likelihood of membership in the class of participants who demonstrated minimal symptom improvement over time. The second analysis examined whether baseline self-critical perfectionism also predicts depression symptom variability and instability. The LAS perfectionism model demonstrated that perfectionism accelerates depression symptom change during the first seven sessions of treatment, then has a decelerating effect on depression symptom change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicated that higher baseline self-critical perfectionism predicted higher variability and instability in depression symptoms and variability in acceleration and deceleration, over the course of treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"61 4","pages":"911-928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-critical perfectionism, dependency and entropy during cognitive behavioural therapy for depression\",\"authors\":\"Lance L. Hawley,&nbsp;Lance M. Rappaport,&nbsp;Christine A. Padesky,&nbsp;Steven D. Hollon,&nbsp;Enza Mancuso,&nbsp;Judith M. Laposa,&nbsp;Karen Brozina,&nbsp;Zindel V. Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjc.12366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examined whether ‘personality vulnerability’ (i.e., self-critical perfectionism or dependency) predicts the trajectory of change, as well as variability and instability (i.e., entropy) of symptoms, during cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Study participants were outpatients (<i>N </i>= 312) experiencing a primary mood disorder. Participants received CBT for depression group sessions over 15 weeks. Self-report measures of self-critical perfectionism, dependency, and depression were collected longitudinally.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A latent growth mixture modelling (LGMM) statistical approach was used to evaluate the presence of latent classes of individuals based on their longitudinal pattern of symptom change during CBT and to evaluate whether baseline self-critical perfectionism or dependency predicts class membership. A Latent Acceleration Score (LAS) model evaluated whether perfectionism or dependency led to variability in depression symptom change (e.g., velocity) by considering changes in velocity (e.g., acceleration and/or deceleration).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>LGMM indicated the presence of two latent classes that represent symptom improvement (<i>N </i>= 239) or minimal symptom improvement over time (<i>N </i>= 73). Elevated baseline self-critical perfectionism, but not dependency, predicted a greater likelihood of membership in the class of participants who demonstrated minimal symptom improvement over time. The second analysis examined whether baseline self-critical perfectionism also predicts depression symptom variability and instability. The LAS perfectionism model demonstrated that perfectionism accelerates depression symptom change during the first seven sessions of treatment, then has a decelerating effect on depression symptom change.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results indicated that higher baseline self-critical perfectionism predicted higher variability and instability in depression symptoms and variability in acceleration and deceleration, over the course of treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"911-928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12366\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究考察了在抑郁症认知行为治疗(CBT)过程中,“人格脆弱性”(即自我批评完美主义或依赖性)是否预测了症状的变化轨迹,以及症状的可变性和不稳定性(即熵)。设计研究的参与者是经历原发性情绪障碍的门诊患者(N=312)。参与者接受了为期15周的CBT抑郁症小组治疗。自我批评完美主义、依赖性和抑郁的自我报告测量是纵向收集的。方法使用潜在生长混合模型(LGMM)统计方法,根据CBT期间症状变化的纵向模式,评估潜在类别的个体的存在,并评估基线自我批评完美主义或依赖性是否预测类别成员。潜在加速分数(LAS)模型通过考虑速度(例如加速和/或减速)的变化来评估完美主义或依赖性是否导致抑郁症状变化(例如速度)的可变性。结果LGMM表明存在两个潜在类别,代表症状改善(N=239)或随着时间的推移症状改善最小(N=73)。基线自我批评完美主义的提高,而不是依赖性的提高,预示着随着时间的推移,症状改善最小的参与者更有可能成为该类别的成员。第二项分析考察了基线自我批评完美主义是否也能预测抑郁症状的可变性和不稳定性。LAS完美主义模型表明,完美主义在治疗的前七个疗程中加速了抑郁症状的变化,然后对抑郁症状的改变有减速作用。结论结果表明,在治疗过程中,基线自我批评完美主义越高,抑郁症状的变异性和不稳定性以及加速和减速的变异性就越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-critical perfectionism, dependency and entropy during cognitive behavioural therapy for depression

Objectives

This study examined whether ‘personality vulnerability’ (i.e., self-critical perfectionism or dependency) predicts the trajectory of change, as well as variability and instability (i.e., entropy) of symptoms, during cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression.

Design

Study participants were outpatients (= 312) experiencing a primary mood disorder. Participants received CBT for depression group sessions over 15 weeks. Self-report measures of self-critical perfectionism, dependency, and depression were collected longitudinally.

Methods

A latent growth mixture modelling (LGMM) statistical approach was used to evaluate the presence of latent classes of individuals based on their longitudinal pattern of symptom change during CBT and to evaluate whether baseline self-critical perfectionism or dependency predicts class membership. A Latent Acceleration Score (LAS) model evaluated whether perfectionism or dependency led to variability in depression symptom change (e.g., velocity) by considering changes in velocity (e.g., acceleration and/or deceleration).

Results

LGMM indicated the presence of two latent classes that represent symptom improvement (= 239) or minimal symptom improvement over time (= 73). Elevated baseline self-critical perfectionism, but not dependency, predicted a greater likelihood of membership in the class of participants who demonstrated minimal symptom improvement over time. The second analysis examined whether baseline self-critical perfectionism also predicts depression symptom variability and instability. The LAS perfectionism model demonstrated that perfectionism accelerates depression symptom change during the first seven sessions of treatment, then has a decelerating effect on depression symptom change.

Conclusions

Results indicated that higher baseline self-critical perfectionism predicted higher variability and instability in depression symptoms and variability in acceleration and deceleration, over the course of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信