性别歧视对性教育的影响:一项实证研究

Silvia Ubillos-Landa , Eider Goiburu-Moreno , Alicia Puente-Martínez , Juan Pablo Pizarro-Ruiz
{"title":"性别歧视对性教育的影响:一项实证研究","authors":"Silvia Ubillos-Landa ,&nbsp;Eider Goiburu-Moreno ,&nbsp;Alicia Puente-Martínez ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Pizarro-Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In recent years, ample evidence has accumulated indicating the advantage of sexual health programs that incorporate a gender perspective. However, to our knowledge, there are no empirical studies on the influence of sexist attitudes on the effectiveness of sex education programs. This study aims to demonstrate that sexism has a negative impact on the results obtained by sex education programs in the prevention of sexual risks through two studies. Study 1 tests whether a sex education program differs in effectiveness based on the level of </span><em>Ambivalent Sexism</em> (ASI) and <em>Sexual Double Standard</em><span> (DSS). The sample was composed by 293 Basque-speaking adolescents from nine secondary schools in the Basque Country (</span><em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->15.56, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.63, range: 15–17). Study 2 analyses whether introducing training aimed at reducing levels of sexism achieves that the sexual education program obtains similar results in young people with high and low sexism—ASI, DSS <em>and the Inventory of Distorted Thoughts on Women and Violence</em> (IDTWV). The sample is made up of 340 Basque-speaking adolescents from eight secondary schools in the Basque Country (<em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->15.54, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.57, range: 15–17). Results point to the relevance of including gender perspective in sexual education programs aimed toward reducing sexism, especially sexual double standards, in order to increase its effectiveness in the prevention of sexual risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101103,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.01.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexism's influence in sex education programs: An empirical study\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Ubillos-Landa ,&nbsp;Eider Goiburu-Moreno ,&nbsp;Alicia Puente-Martínez ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Pizarro-Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In recent years, ample evidence has accumulated indicating the advantage of sexual health programs that incorporate a gender perspective. However, to our knowledge, there are no empirical studies on the influence of sexist attitudes on the effectiveness of sex education programs. This study aims to demonstrate that sexism has a negative impact on the results obtained by sex education programs in the prevention of sexual risks through two studies. Study 1 tests whether a sex education program differs in effectiveness based on the level of </span><em>Ambivalent Sexism</em> (ASI) and <em>Sexual Double Standard</em><span> (DSS). The sample was composed by 293 Basque-speaking adolescents from nine secondary schools in the Basque Country (</span><em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->15.56, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.63, range: 15–17). Study 2 analyses whether introducing training aimed at reducing levels of sexism achieves that the sexual education program obtains similar results in young people with high and low sexism—ASI, DSS <em>and the Inventory of Distorted Thoughts on Women and Violence</em> (IDTWV). The sample is made up of 340 Basque-speaking adolescents from eight secondary schools in the Basque Country (<em>M</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->15.54, <em>SD</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.57, range: 15–17). Results point to the relevance of including gender perspective in sexual education programs aimed toward reducing sexism, especially sexual double standards, in order to increase its effectiveness in the prevention of sexual risks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.01.002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380521000083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380521000083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,积累了大量证据,表明纳入性别观点的性健康计划具有优势。然而,据我们所知,还没有关于性别歧视态度对性教育项目有效性的影响的实证研究。本研究旨在通过两项研究证明性别歧视对性教育项目在预防性风险方面取得的结果产生了负面影响。研究1测试了性教育项目的有效性是否因歧义性歧视(ASI)和性双重标准(DSS)的水平而不同。该样本由巴斯克地区九所中学的293名讲巴斯克语的青少年组成(M=15.56,SD=0.63,范围:15-17)。研究2分析了旨在降低性别歧视水平的培训是否能使性教育计划在性别歧视程度高和低的年轻人中获得类似的结果——ASI、DSS和关于妇女和暴力的扭曲思想清单(IDTWV)。样本由来自巴斯克地区八所中学的340名讲巴斯克语的青少年组成(M=15.54,SD=0.57,范围:15-17)。研究结果表明,将性别观点纳入旨在减少性别歧视,特别是性双重标准的性教育项目,以提高其预防性风险的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sexism's influence in sex education programs: An empirical study

In recent years, ample evidence has accumulated indicating the advantage of sexual health programs that incorporate a gender perspective. However, to our knowledge, there are no empirical studies on the influence of sexist attitudes on the effectiveness of sex education programs. This study aims to demonstrate that sexism has a negative impact on the results obtained by sex education programs in the prevention of sexual risks through two studies. Study 1 tests whether a sex education program differs in effectiveness based on the level of Ambivalent Sexism (ASI) and Sexual Double Standard (DSS). The sample was composed by 293 Basque-speaking adolescents from nine secondary schools in the Basque Country (M = 15.56, SD = 0.63, range: 15–17). Study 2 analyses whether introducing training aimed at reducing levels of sexism achieves that the sexual education program obtains similar results in young people with high and low sexism—ASI, DSS and the Inventory of Distorted Thoughts on Women and Violence (IDTWV). The sample is made up of 340 Basque-speaking adolescents from eight secondary schools in the Basque Country (M = 15.54, SD = 0.57, range: 15–17). Results point to the relevance of including gender perspective in sexual education programs aimed toward reducing sexism, especially sexual double standards, in order to increase its effectiveness in the prevention of sexual risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信