从婴儿到家庭:从婴儿观察到精神分析家庭治疗:除了实践上的差异,还有一些共同点

Q4 Medicine
C. Mille , M. Braun , M. Paolucci
{"title":"从婴儿到家庭:从婴儿观察到精神分析家庭治疗:除了实践上的差异,还有一些共同点","authors":"C. Mille ,&nbsp;M. Braun ,&nbsp;M. Paolucci","doi":"10.1016/j.neurenf.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Psychoanalytic family therapy and infant observation according to the Esther Bick method differ a priori in their aims. One is a psychotherapeutic device while the other is a training course for psychotherapists. Both approaches have psychoanalytic theory, its epistemology and ethics, as their common basis. The clinicians are guided by the families they meet, whether they are suffering or “normally well”. Thinking jointly about these two systems makes it possible to overcome the debate that opposes the “real baby”, of direct and developmental observation, and the “true baby”, reconstructed on the couch. In fact, the observer in training is witness to the narration of fantasmatic and transgenerational elements, weaving a psychic cradle that welcomes the “real baby” and where the construction of the “true baby” begins. Family therapists are naturally attentive to these plural constructions and imaginaries, and to the claims of these eternal babies that families still carry within them. Both approaches involve attention to the archaic, to affective and sensory experiences, and both rely on the group: the observer witnesses the birth or remodeling of the family group, while the support group participates in the transformation of the observed material in search of elaboration. In the same way, the neo-group, composed of the family therapists and the families, supports a space of containing reverie, which facilitates the re-establishment of a new form of fantasmatic circulation. The observer, by his presence, modifies the family system in which he is in fact included, families testify to the benefit they derive from these meetings, and therapeutic applications at home have thus been set up to support families in difficulty, while at the same time, practitioners defend the interest of psychoanalytical family work in perinatal care. The articulation of these two systems gives us a glimpse of fruitful perspectives for training, prevention and psychotherapeutic support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39666,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence","volume":"71 7","pages":"Pages 364-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Du bébé à la famille : de l’observation du nourrisson à la thérapie familiale psychanalytique : au-delà des différences de pratique, quelques points de convergence\",\"authors\":\"C. Mille ,&nbsp;M. Braun ,&nbsp;M. Paolucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurenf.2023.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Psychoanalytic family therapy and infant observation according to the Esther Bick method differ a priori in their aims. One is a psychotherapeutic device while the other is a training course for psychotherapists. Both approaches have psychoanalytic theory, its epistemology and ethics, as their common basis. The clinicians are guided by the families they meet, whether they are suffering or “normally well”. Thinking jointly about these two systems makes it possible to overcome the debate that opposes the “real baby”, of direct and developmental observation, and the “true baby”, reconstructed on the couch. In fact, the observer in training is witness to the narration of fantasmatic and transgenerational elements, weaving a psychic cradle that welcomes the “real baby” and where the construction of the “true baby” begins. Family therapists are naturally attentive to these plural constructions and imaginaries, and to the claims of these eternal babies that families still carry within them. Both approaches involve attention to the archaic, to affective and sensory experiences, and both rely on the group: the observer witnesses the birth or remodeling of the family group, while the support group participates in the transformation of the observed material in search of elaboration. In the same way, the neo-group, composed of the family therapists and the families, supports a space of containing reverie, which facilitates the re-establishment of a new form of fantasmatic circulation. The observer, by his presence, modifies the family system in which he is in fact included, families testify to the benefit they derive from these meetings, and therapeutic applications at home have thus been set up to support families in difficulty, while at the same time, practitioners defend the interest of psychoanalytical family work in perinatal care. The articulation of these two systems gives us a glimpse of fruitful perspectives for training, prevention and psychotherapeutic support.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence\",\"volume\":\"71 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 364-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0222961723001307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0222961723001307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据Esther Bick方法进行的心理分析家庭治疗和婴儿观察在其目的上存在先验差异。一个是心理治疗设备,另一个是心理治疗师的培训课程。这两种方法都以精神分析理论、其认识论和伦理学为共同基础。临床医生受到他们遇到的家庭的指导,无论他们是在受苦还是“正常情况下”。共同思考这两个系统可以克服反对直接和发展观察的“真正的婴儿”和在沙发上重建的“真正婴儿”的争论。事实上,训练中的观察者见证了幻想和跨性别元素的叙事,编织了一个迎接“真正婴儿”的心理摇篮,也是“真正婴儿“构建的起点。家庭治疗师自然会关注这些复数结构和想象,以及家庭仍然携带着这些永恒婴儿的主张。这两种方法都涉及对古老的、情感和感官体验的关注,并且都依赖于群体:观察者见证了家庭群体的诞生或重塑,而支持群体则参与了观察到的材料的转化,以寻求细化。同样,由家庭治疗师和家庭组成的新群体支持了一个包含遐想的空间,这有助于重新建立一种新的幻想循环形式。观察者的出现改变了他实际上所处的家庭系统,家庭证明了他们从这些会议中获得的好处,因此在家中设立了治疗应用程序,以支持有困难的家庭,同时,从业者捍卫了心理分析家庭工作在围产期护理中的利益。这两个系统的结合让我们看到了培训、预防和心理治疗支持的富有成效的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Du bébé à la famille : de l’observation du nourrisson à la thérapie familiale psychanalytique : au-delà des différences de pratique, quelques points de convergence

Psychoanalytic family therapy and infant observation according to the Esther Bick method differ a priori in their aims. One is a psychotherapeutic device while the other is a training course for psychotherapists. Both approaches have psychoanalytic theory, its epistemology and ethics, as their common basis. The clinicians are guided by the families they meet, whether they are suffering or “normally well”. Thinking jointly about these two systems makes it possible to overcome the debate that opposes the “real baby”, of direct and developmental observation, and the “true baby”, reconstructed on the couch. In fact, the observer in training is witness to the narration of fantasmatic and transgenerational elements, weaving a psychic cradle that welcomes the “real baby” and where the construction of the “true baby” begins. Family therapists are naturally attentive to these plural constructions and imaginaries, and to the claims of these eternal babies that families still carry within them. Both approaches involve attention to the archaic, to affective and sensory experiences, and both rely on the group: the observer witnesses the birth or remodeling of the family group, while the support group participates in the transformation of the observed material in search of elaboration. In the same way, the neo-group, composed of the family therapists and the families, supports a space of containing reverie, which facilitates the re-establishment of a new form of fantasmatic circulation. The observer, by his presence, modifies the family system in which he is in fact included, families testify to the benefit they derive from these meetings, and therapeutic applications at home have thus been set up to support families in difficulty, while at the same time, practitioners defend the interest of psychoanalytical family work in perinatal care. The articulation of these two systems gives us a glimpse of fruitful perspectives for training, prevention and psychotherapeutic support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence
Neuropsychiatrie de l''Enfance et de l''Adolescence Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Organ of the Société française de psychiatrie de enfant et de adolescent, Neuropsychiatrie de enfance et de adolescence tackles all fields of child-adolescent psychiatry and offers a link between field and clinical work. As a reference and training tool for students and practitioners, the journal publishes original papers in child psychiatry as well as book reviews and conference reports. Each issue also offers a calendar of the main events dealing with the speciality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信