确定改善前列腺癌症临床试验中少数民族社区登记的临床观点和策略。

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2023-10-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Lauren Brady, Jenney R Lee, Evan Y Yu, Daniel Lin, John L Gore, Peter S Nelson, Frances Shiely, Yaw A Nyame
{"title":"确定改善前列腺癌症临床试验中少数民族社区登记的临床观点和策略。","authors":"Lauren Brady, Jenney R Lee, Evan Y Yu, Daniel Lin, John L Gore, Peter S Nelson, Frances Shiely, Yaw A Nyame","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black men and other minoritized populations have represented 4-5% or less of participants in most practice-informing clinical trials. This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of clinicians around equity and inclusion in prostate cancer clinical trial initiatives in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous, web-based questionnaire was administered via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) with questions focused on inclusivity of minoritized populations with respect to race and ethnicity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. The survey link was distributed across the United States via several professional organizations, prostate cancer groups, and social media. Responses were analyzed both quantitatively (descriptive statistics) and qualitatively (thematic analysis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 131 respondents completed the survey (70% self-identified as White, 17% as Asian, and 6% as Black). Most respondents practiced in an urban setting (89%). Of those who engaged in outreach with minoritized communities during the trial design process, 69% observed improved enrollment of minoritized populations. However, 18% of respondents noted that outreach alone does not overcome existing structural barriers to participation in clinical trials. Thematic analysis identified four key areas to address for improving equity: structural, health system, trial-/study-specific, and relationship-/engagement-related factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study participants demonstrated a knowledge of the importance of improving equity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. Designing trials that reduce issues associated with access and improving community outreach were emphasized as key focus areas for reducing health disparities in prostate cancer clinical trials research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"11 5","pages":"385-394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining clinical perspectives and strategies for improving enrollment of minoritized communities in prostate cancer clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Brady, Jenney R Lee, Evan Y Yu, Daniel Lin, John L Gore, Peter S Nelson, Frances Shiely, Yaw A Nyame\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black men and other minoritized populations have represented 4-5% or less of participants in most practice-informing clinical trials. This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of clinicians around equity and inclusion in prostate cancer clinical trial initiatives in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous, web-based questionnaire was administered via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) with questions focused on inclusivity of minoritized populations with respect to race and ethnicity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. The survey link was distributed across the United States via several professional organizations, prostate cancer groups, and social media. Responses were analyzed both quantitatively (descriptive statistics) and qualitatively (thematic analysis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 131 respondents completed the survey (70% self-identified as White, 17% as Asian, and 6% as Black). Most respondents practiced in an urban setting (89%). Of those who engaged in outreach with minoritized communities during the trial design process, 69% observed improved enrollment of minoritized populations. However, 18% of respondents noted that outreach alone does not overcome existing structural barriers to participation in clinical trials. Thematic analysis identified four key areas to address for improving equity: structural, health system, trial-/study-specific, and relationship-/engagement-related factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study participants demonstrated a knowledge of the importance of improving equity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. Designing trials that reduce issues associated with access and improving community outreach were emphasized as key focus areas for reducing health disparities in prostate cancer clinical trials research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"385-394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628627/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在大多数实践指导临床试验中,黑人男性和其他少数民族占参与者的4-5%或更少。本研究旨在评估临床医生对美国前列腺癌症临床试验计划公平性和包容性的知识、态度和实践,基于网络的问卷通过REDCap(研究电子数据捕获)进行管理,问题集中在前列腺癌症临床试验研究中少数民族人群在种族和民族方面的包容性。调查链接通过几个专业组织、癌症团体和社交媒体在美国各地发布。对回答进行了定量分析(描述性统计)和定性分析(主题分析)。结果:总体而言,131名受访者完成了调查(70%自称白人,17%自称亚洲人,6%自称黑人)。大多数受访者在城市环境中实习(89%)。在试验设计过程中与少数族裔社区进行外联的人中,69%的人观察到少数族裔人群的入学率有所提高。然而,18%的受访者指出,仅靠外展并不能克服参与临床试验的现有结构性障碍。专题分析确定了改善公平的四个关键领域:结构、卫生系统、特定试验/研究以及与关系/参与相关的因素。结论:研究参与者证明了提高前列腺癌症临床试验研究公平性的重要性。在前列腺癌症临床试验研究中,设计减少与获取相关问题的试验和改善社区外联被强调为减少健康差异的关键重点领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining clinical perspectives and strategies for improving enrollment of minoritized communities in prostate cancer clinical trials.

Background: Black men and other minoritized populations have represented 4-5% or less of participants in most practice-informing clinical trials. This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of clinicians around equity and inclusion in prostate cancer clinical trial initiatives in the United States.

Methods: An anonymous, web-based questionnaire was administered via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) with questions focused on inclusivity of minoritized populations with respect to race and ethnicity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. The survey link was distributed across the United States via several professional organizations, prostate cancer groups, and social media. Responses were analyzed both quantitatively (descriptive statistics) and qualitatively (thematic analysis).

Results: Overall, 131 respondents completed the survey (70% self-identified as White, 17% as Asian, and 6% as Black). Most respondents practiced in an urban setting (89%). Of those who engaged in outreach with minoritized communities during the trial design process, 69% observed improved enrollment of minoritized populations. However, 18% of respondents noted that outreach alone does not overcome existing structural barriers to participation in clinical trials. Thematic analysis identified four key areas to address for improving equity: structural, health system, trial-/study-specific, and relationship-/engagement-related factors.

Conclusion: Study participants demonstrated a knowledge of the importance of improving equity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. Designing trials that reduce issues associated with access and improving community outreach were emphasized as key focus areas for reducing health disparities in prostate cancer clinical trials research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信