约翰·古德温与新亚美尼亚主义的起源

IF 0.7 1区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1017/s0021937100590066

Ellen More

{"title":"约翰·古德温与新亚美尼亚主义的起源","authors":"Ellen More","doi":"10.1017/s0021937100590066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between the accession of Charles I in 1625 and the restoration of Charles II in 1660 Calvinism lost its hold over English religious life. The effect of Arminianism on this decline has yet to be fully understood. The impact of the early English Arminians, the circle of Archbishop Laud, is, to be sure, well known. Less appreciated is the emergence of an Arminian critique of Calvinism from within the culture of nonconformity. This “radical” or, preferably, “new” Arminianism was a phenomenon of the Cromwellian era, the 1640s and 1650s. By reconstructing the origins of the new Arminianism of its chief exponent, John Goodwin (1595-1666), this essay will try to demonstrate its pivotal place as a link between the Puritanism of the pre-civil war decades and the rational theology of the early English Enlightenment.","PeriodicalId":46738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of British Studies","volume":"53 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Goodwin and the Origins of the New Arminianism\",\"authors\":\"Ellen More\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0021937100590066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between the accession of Charles I in 1625 and the restoration of Charles II in 1660 Calvinism lost its hold over English religious life. The effect of Arminianism on this decline has yet to be fully understood. The impact of the early English Arminians, the circle of Archbishop Laud, is, to be sure, well known. Less appreciated is the emergence of an Arminian critique of Calvinism from within the culture of nonconformity. This “radical” or, preferably, “new” Arminianism was a phenomenon of the Cromwellian era, the 1640s and 1650s. By reconstructing the origins of the new Arminianism of its chief exponent, John Goodwin (1595-1666), this essay will try to demonstrate its pivotal place as a link between the Puritanism of the pre-civil war decades and the rational theology of the early English Enlightenment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of British Studies\",\"volume\":\"53 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of British Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021937100590066\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of British Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021937100590066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

从1625年查理一世登基到1660年查理二世复辟，加尔文主义失去了对英国宗教生活的控制。亚美尼亚主义对这种衰落的影响尚待充分理解。可以肯定的是，早期英国阿米尼亚人，即劳德大主教圈子的影响是众所周知的。不太受重视的是阿米尼派从不一致的文化中对加尔文主义的批判。这种“激进”或更可取的是，“新”的亚美尼亚主义是克伦威尔时代、1640年代和1650年代的一种现象。本文试图通过重建其主要倡导者约翰·古德温（1595-1666）的新亚美尼亚主义的起源，来展示其作为内战前几十年清教主义与英国早期启蒙运动理性神学之间联系的枢纽地位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

John Goodwin and the Origins of the New Arminianism

Between the accession of Charles I in 1625 and the restoration of Charles II in 1660 Calvinism lost its hold over English religious life. The effect of Arminianism on this decline has yet to be fully understood. The impact of the early English Arminians, the circle of Archbishop Laud, is, to be sure, well known. Less appreciated is the emergence of an Arminian critique of Calvinism from within the culture of nonconformity. This “radical” or, preferably, “new” Arminianism was a phenomenon of the Cromwellian era, the 1640s and 1650s. By reconstructing the origins of the new Arminianism of its chief exponent, John Goodwin (1595-1666), this essay will try to demonstrate its pivotal place as a link between the Puritanism of the pre-civil war decades and the rational theology of the early English Enlightenment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of British Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

10.00%

发文量

163

期刊介绍： The official publication of the North American Conference on British Studies (NACBS), the Journal of British Studies, has positioned itself as the critical resource for scholars of British culture from the Middle Ages through the present. Drawing on both established and emerging approaches, JBS presents scholarly articles and books reviews from renowned international authors who share their ideas on British society, politics, law, economics, and the arts. In 2005 (Vol. 44), the journal merged with the NACBS publication Albion, creating one journal for NACBS membership. The NACBS also sponsors an annual conference , as well as several academic prizes, graduate fellowships, and undergraduate essay contests .