警察与市民遭遇视频中摄像机视角偏差的实验研究

IF 1.8 2区社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Journal of Experimental Criminology Pub Date : 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1007/s11292-023-09591-9

Jimin Pyo, Nerea Marteache, Michael G. Maxfield

{"title":"警察与市民遭遇视频中摄像机视角偏差的实验研究","authors":"Jimin Pyo, Nerea Marteache, Michael G. Maxfield","doi":"10.1007/s11292-023-09591-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>This study tested camera perspective bias in evaluating a video-recorded police and citizen interaction.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Using professional actors, a simulated police-citizen traffic stop was recorded from three camera perspectives – police, citizen, and bystander. A sample of 830 participants recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk viewed one of the three randomly assigned videos before rating police behavior and legitimacy during the encounter.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We found no evidence of the effects of camera perspective on how individuals evaluated a police traffic stop. Higher pre-test perceived police legitimacy was associated with more positive perceptions of police behavior and legitimacy during the encounter.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the role of general perceptions of police legitimacy in evaluating a video-recorded police-citizen encounter. Possible explanations for the lack of camera perspective bias, as well as potential research uses of custom-recorded videos, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"114 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiment on camera perspective bias in videos of police-citizen encounters\",\"authors\":\"Jimin Pyo, Nerea Marteache, Michael G. Maxfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11292-023-09591-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>This study tested camera perspective bias in evaluating a video-recorded police and citizen interaction.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Using professional actors, a simulated police-citizen traffic stop was recorded from three camera perspectives – police, citizen, and bystander. A sample of 830 participants recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk viewed one of the three randomly assigned videos before rating police behavior and legitimacy during the encounter.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>We found no evidence of the effects of camera perspective on how individuals evaluated a police traffic stop. Higher pre-test perceived police legitimacy was associated with more positive perceptions of police behavior and legitimacy during the encounter.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the role of general perceptions of police legitimacy in evaluating a video-recorded police-citizen encounter. Possible explanations for the lack of camera perspective bias, as well as potential research uses of custom-recorded videos, are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"volume\":\"114 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09591-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09591-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究测试了摄像机在评估警察和公民互动视频时的视角偏差。方法采用专业演员，从警察、市民和旁观者三个视角，模拟警察-市民交通拦截。从亚马逊的Mechanical Turk招募的830名参与者的样本观看了三个随机分配的视频中的一个，然后对警察在遭遇过程中的行为和合法性进行了评级。结果我们没有发现摄像机视角对个人评估警察交通拦截的影响的证据。测试前感知的警察合法性越高，在遭遇过程中对警察行为和合法性的感知就越积极。结论本研究强调了对警察合法性的普遍认知在评估警察与公民的视频遭遇中的作用。讨论了缺乏相机视角偏见的可能解释，以及自定义录制视频的潜在研究用途。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Experiment on camera perspective bias in videos of police-citizen encounters

Objectives

This study tested camera perspective bias in evaluating a video-recorded police and citizen interaction.

Methods

Using professional actors, a simulated police-citizen traffic stop was recorded from three camera perspectives – police, citizen, and bystander. A sample of 830 participants recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk viewed one of the three randomly assigned videos before rating police behavior and legitimacy during the encounter.

Results

We found no evidence of the effects of camera perspective on how individuals evaluated a police traffic stop. Higher pre-test perceived police legitimacy was associated with more positive perceptions of police behavior and legitimacy during the encounter.

Conclusions

This study highlights the role of general perceptions of police legitimacy in evaluating a video-recorded police-citizen encounter. Possible explanations for the lack of camera perspective bias, as well as potential research uses of custom-recorded videos, are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.