是否等待备份？警察在应对活跃的枪击事件时如何看待自己的角色

IF 1.8 2区社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Journal of Experimental Criminology Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1007/s11292-023-09592-8

M. Hunter Martaindale, William L. Sandel, J. Pete Blair

{"title":"是否等待备份？警察在应对活跃的枪击事件时如何看待自己的角色","authors":"M. Hunter Martaindale, William L. Sandel, J. Pete Blair","doi":"10.1007/s11292-023-09592-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>Test whether current law enforcement officers believe that they should immediately enter an active shooter scene before waiting on additional officers.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Quasi-experimental vignette design with random assignment to 10 vignettes from a universe of 324. The sample consisted of 796 current law enforcement officers from 43 states, which responded to a total of 7394 vignettes. This report utilized a mixed effects logistic model to assess the appropriateness of the hypothetical officer’s actions in responding to an active shooter event.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Respondents were between 14 and 80 times more likely to agree with the hypothetical officer’s decision to immediately enter an active shooter scene when a driving force was present (i.e., ongoing gunfire or injured victims). This agreement varied across models as we explore different interaction effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Law enforcement agree with the public sentiment that officers should immediately enter active shooter locations if there is an ongoing threat.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"114 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wait for backup or not? How police officers view their role when responding to an active shooter event\",\"authors\":\"M. Hunter Martaindale, William L. Sandel, J. Pete Blair\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11292-023-09592-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>Test whether current law enforcement officers believe that they should immediately enter an active shooter scene before waiting on additional officers.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Quasi-experimental vignette design with random assignment to 10 vignettes from a universe of 324. The sample consisted of 796 current law enforcement officers from 43 states, which responded to a total of 7394 vignettes. This report utilized a mixed effects logistic model to assess the appropriateness of the hypothetical officer’s actions in responding to an active shooter event.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Respondents were between 14 and 80 times more likely to agree with the hypothetical officer’s decision to immediately enter an active shooter scene when a driving force was present (i.e., ongoing gunfire or injured victims). This agreement varied across models as we explore different interaction effects.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Law enforcement agree with the public sentiment that officers should immediately enter active shooter locations if there is an ongoing threat.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"volume\":\"114 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09592-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09592-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的测试目前的执法人员是否认为他们应该在等待更多的警察之前立即进入活跃的枪击现场。方法从324个宇宙中随机分配10个小插曲进行准实验小插曲设计。样本由来自43个州的796名现任执法人员组成，他们总共回应了7394个小插曲。本报告使用混合效应逻辑模型来评估假设军官在应对活跃射击事件时的行动是否适当。结果受访者同意假设警官在有驱动力（即持续的枪击或受伤的受害者）的情况下立即进入活跃的枪击现场的决定的可能性在14到80倍之间。随着我们探索不同的相互作用效果，这种一致性在不同的模型中有所不同。结论执法部门同意公众的看法，即如果存在持续的威胁，警察应该立即进入枪手活动地点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Wait for backup or not? How police officers view their role when responding to an active shooter event

Objectives

Test whether current law enforcement officers believe that they should immediately enter an active shooter scene before waiting on additional officers.

Methods

Quasi-experimental vignette design with random assignment to 10 vignettes from a universe of 324. The sample consisted of 796 current law enforcement officers from 43 states, which responded to a total of 7394 vignettes. This report utilized a mixed effects logistic model to assess the appropriateness of the hypothetical officer’s actions in responding to an active shooter event.

Results

Respondents were between 14 and 80 times more likely to agree with the hypothetical officer’s decision to immediately enter an active shooter scene when a driving force was present (i.e., ongoing gunfire or injured victims). This agreement varied across models as we explore different interaction effects.

Conclusions

Law enforcement agree with the public sentiment that officers should immediately enter active shooter locations if there is an ongoing threat.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.