受保护物种的在线野生动物交易

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Andrea Soriano-Redondo, Haider Alwasiti, Ritwik Kulkarni, Ricardo A. Correia, Sofiya Bryukhova, Nermalie M. Lita, Lodigario A. Rigor, Darwin R. Tejerero, Theresa M. Tenazas, Enrico Di Minin
{"title":"受保护物种的在线野生动物交易","authors":"Andrea Soriano-Redondo, Haider Alwasiti, Ritwik Kulkarni, Ricardo A. Correia, Sofiya Bryukhova, Nermalie M. Lita, Lodigario A. Rigor, Darwin R. Tejerero, Theresa M. Tenazas, Enrico Di Minin","doi":"10.1111/conl.12985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online wildlife trade is widespread and affects thousands of species. Yet, attempts to quantify online wildlife trade have mainly focused on a few platforms and taxonomic groups. Here, we study the prevalence of wildlife trade using automated data collection and filtering methods. We analyze trade across five digital platforms and 156 animal and plant species of conservation concern from a global biodiversity hotspot, the Philippines. We identified approximately 5000 highly relevant instances of trade in 1.47 million posts, focusing on 108 species, 79 of which are classified as threatened. Trade mainly occurred on webpages indexed in Google and on Twitter. We found that manual validation is essential, as animals obtained a higher proportion of hits prior to validation. Following manual validation, we observed a shift toward plant-related trade hits. Scaling up these approaches to a global level is key to understanding the extent of digital wildlife trade across the globe.","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"32 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online wildlife trade in species of conservation concern\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Soriano-Redondo, Haider Alwasiti, Ritwik Kulkarni, Ricardo A. Correia, Sofiya Bryukhova, Nermalie M. Lita, Lodigario A. Rigor, Darwin R. Tejerero, Theresa M. Tenazas, Enrico Di Minin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/conl.12985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online wildlife trade is widespread and affects thousands of species. Yet, attempts to quantify online wildlife trade have mainly focused on a few platforms and taxonomic groups. Here, we study the prevalence of wildlife trade using automated data collection and filtering methods. We analyze trade across five digital platforms and 156 animal and plant species of conservation concern from a global biodiversity hotspot, the Philippines. We identified approximately 5000 highly relevant instances of trade in 1.47 million posts, focusing on 108 species, 79 of which are classified as threatened. Trade mainly occurred on webpages indexed in Google and on Twitter. We found that manual validation is essential, as animals obtained a higher proportion of hits prior to validation. Following manual validation, we observed a shift toward plant-related trade hits. Scaling up these approaches to a global level is key to understanding the extent of digital wildlife trade across the globe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"volume\":\"32 51\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12985\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12985","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网上野生动物交易十分普遍,影响着成千上万的物种。然而,量化在线野生动物贸易的尝试主要集中在几个平台和分类群体上。在这里,我们使用自动数据收集和过滤方法研究野生动物贸易的普遍性。我们分析了来自全球生物多样性热点菲律宾的五个数字平台和156种受保护的动植物物种的贸易。我们在147万个帖子中发现了大约5000个高度相关的贸易案例,重点关注108个物种,其中79个被列为受威胁物种。交易主要发生在谷歌和推特的网页上。我们发现,手动验证是必不可少的,因为动物在验证前获得了更高比例的命中率。在手动验证之后,我们观察到了与工厂相关的贸易打击的转变。将这些方法推广到全球水平是了解全球数字野生动物贸易程度的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online wildlife trade in species of conservation concern
Online wildlife trade is widespread and affects thousands of species. Yet, attempts to quantify online wildlife trade have mainly focused on a few platforms and taxonomic groups. Here, we study the prevalence of wildlife trade using automated data collection and filtering methods. We analyze trade across five digital platforms and 156 animal and plant species of conservation concern from a global biodiversity hotspot, the Philippines. We identified approximately 5000 highly relevant instances of trade in 1.47 million posts, focusing on 108 species, 79 of which are classified as threatened. Trade mainly occurred on webpages indexed in Google and on Twitter. We found that manual validation is essential, as animals obtained a higher proportion of hits prior to validation. Following manual validation, we observed a shift toward plant-related trade hits. Scaling up these approaches to a global level is key to understanding the extent of digital wildlife trade across the globe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信