利用Er:YAG、PDT活化的Rosebengal和三氧化二铝颗粒对复合树脂的表面粗糙度和结合完整性进行PEEK表面处理。

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103879
Waleed M S Alqahtani, Nishath Sayed Abdul, Kashif Aslam, Abdulmohsen Alanazi, Nisren Ansary, Saad Saleh Alresayes, Abdulaziz Samran, Fayez Hussain Niazi
{"title":"利用Er:YAG、PDT活化的Rosebengal和三氧化二铝颗粒对复合树脂的表面粗糙度和结合完整性进行PEEK表面处理。","authors":"Waleed M S Alqahtani, Nishath Sayed Abdul, Kashif Aslam, Abdulmohsen Alanazi, Nisren Ansary, Saad Saleh Alresayes, Abdulaziz Samran, Fayez Hussain Niazi","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the impact of conditioning protocols, aluminum trioxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), Er:YAG laser (EYL), and Rosebengal (RB), on the surface roughness (Ra) and shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) attached to composite restorations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty PEEK discs in total were produced and then divided into four groups (n = 20). Group1:Sulfuric acid (SA), Group 2: PDT (RB), Group 3: Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Group 4 EYL, respectively. The Ra of PEEK discs was evaluated using the surface profilometer. After being luted, the discs were attached to composite resin discs. After that, samples were put to SBS testing on a Universal testing apparatus. A stereo microscope was also used to evaluate the type of breakdown. The data were analyzed using Tukey's test and one-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SA treated group exhibited the highest Ra. Nevertheless, the RB specimens activated by PDT treatment had the lowest mean Ra score. The group that received the treatment of SA exhibited the highest average score of SBS. In contrast, specimens treated with PDT and activated by RB exhibited the lowest levels of bond fidelity. Cohesive failure emerges as the prevailing kind of fracture within the various groups subjected to testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilization of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, RB activated by PDT, and EYL shows promise as a viable substitute for Sulfuric acid in enhancing the bond integrity of composite cement and surface roughness in PEEK materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94170,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","volume":" ","pages":"103879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEEK surface treatment on surface roughness and bond integrity to composite resin utilizing Er: YAG, Rosebengal activated by PDT, and aluminum trioxide particles.\",\"authors\":\"Waleed M S Alqahtani, Nishath Sayed Abdul, Kashif Aslam, Abdulmohsen Alanazi, Nisren Ansary, Saad Saleh Alresayes, Abdulaziz Samran, Fayez Hussain Niazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the impact of conditioning protocols, aluminum trioxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), Er:YAG laser (EYL), and Rosebengal (RB), on the surface roughness (Ra) and shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) attached to composite restorations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty PEEK discs in total were produced and then divided into four groups (n = 20). Group1:Sulfuric acid (SA), Group 2: PDT (RB), Group 3: Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Group 4 EYL, respectively. The Ra of PEEK discs was evaluated using the surface profilometer. After being luted, the discs were attached to composite resin discs. After that, samples were put to SBS testing on a Universal testing apparatus. A stereo microscope was also used to evaluate the type of breakdown. The data were analyzed using Tukey's test and one-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SA treated group exhibited the highest Ra. Nevertheless, the RB specimens activated by PDT treatment had the lowest mean Ra score. The group that received the treatment of SA exhibited the highest average score of SBS. In contrast, specimens treated with PDT and activated by RB exhibited the lowest levels of bond fidelity. Cohesive failure emerges as the prevailing kind of fracture within the various groups subjected to testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilization of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, RB activated by PDT, and EYL shows promise as a viable substitute for Sulfuric acid in enhancing the bond integrity of composite cement and surface roughness in PEEK materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估三氧化二铝(Al2O3)、Er:YAG激光(EYL)和Rosebengal(RB)等调理方案对复合修复体聚醚醚酮(PEEK)表面粗糙度(Ra)和剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。方法:共制作80个PEEK椎间盘,分为4组(n=20)。第1组:硫酸(SA),第2组:PDT(RB),第3组:Al2O3,第4组:EYL。使用表面轮廓仪评估PEEK盘的Ra。稀释后,将圆盘连接到复合树脂圆盘上。之后,在通用测试设备上对样品进行SBS测试。立体显微镜也被用来评估击穿的类型。使用Tukey检验和单向方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:SA治疗组Ra最高。然而,通过PDT治疗激活的RB标本具有最低的平均Ra评分。接受SA治疗的组表现出最高的SBS平均得分。相反,用PDT处理并用RB活化的样品表现出最低水平的键保真度。内聚破坏是受试各组中普遍存在的一种断裂。结论:利用Al2O3、PDT活化的RB和EYL有望作为硫酸的可行替代品,提高复合水泥的粘结完整性和PEEK材料的表面粗糙度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PEEK surface treatment on surface roughness and bond integrity to composite resin utilizing Er: YAG, Rosebengal activated by PDT, and aluminum trioxide particles.

Aims: To evaluate the impact of conditioning protocols, aluminum trioxide (Al2O3), Er:YAG laser (EYL), and Rosebengal (RB), on the surface roughness (Ra) and shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) attached to composite restorations.

Method: Eighty PEEK discs in total were produced and then divided into four groups (n = 20). Group1:Sulfuric acid (SA), Group 2: PDT (RB), Group 3: Al2O3, Group 4 EYL, respectively. The Ra of PEEK discs was evaluated using the surface profilometer. After being luted, the discs were attached to composite resin discs. After that, samples were put to SBS testing on a Universal testing apparatus. A stereo microscope was also used to evaluate the type of breakdown. The data were analyzed using Tukey's test and one-way analysis of variance.

Results: The SA treated group exhibited the highest Ra. Nevertheless, the RB specimens activated by PDT treatment had the lowest mean Ra score. The group that received the treatment of SA exhibited the highest average score of SBS. In contrast, specimens treated with PDT and activated by RB exhibited the lowest levels of bond fidelity. Cohesive failure emerges as the prevailing kind of fracture within the various groups subjected to testing.

Conclusion: The utilization of Al2O3, RB activated by PDT, and EYL shows promise as a viable substitute for Sulfuric acid in enhancing the bond integrity of composite cement and surface roughness in PEEK materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信