CD45.1/CD45.2同源标记物在淋巴细胞减少症小鼠过继性淋巴细胞重建过程中诱导CD8+T细胞的选择性偏向。

Q3 Medicine
Rakhee Rathnam Kalari Kandy, Xiaoxuan Fan, Xuefang Cao
{"title":"CD45.1/CD45.2同源标记物在淋巴细胞减少症小鼠过继性淋巴细胞重建过程中诱导CD8+T细胞的选择性偏向。","authors":"Rakhee Rathnam Kalari Kandy, Xiaoxuan Fan, Xuefang Cao","doi":"10.4049/immunohorizons.2300014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CD45.1/CD45.2 congenic markers have been used to track hematopoietic lineage differentiation following hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantation. However, several studies suggest that a bias exists in CD45.1 versus CD45.2 hematopoietic cell reconstitution from HSPCs. Meanwhile, no definitive comparison has been reported for mature immune cells as to whether the CD45.1/CD45.2 disparity can skew the immune cell response. In this study, using lymphocytopenia Rag1-/- CD45.2 mice as hosts, we assessed the reconstitution potential of CD45.1 versus CD45.2 lymphocytes following adoptive transfer of mature T and B cells. We have found a selective bias for CD8+ T cells in that CD45.1 cells showed significantly higher reconstitution compared with CD45.2 cells, whereas CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells showed equivalent reconstitution. These results suggest that CD45.1/CD45.2 markers may induce an alloreactive response or a survival bias specific to CD8+ T cells, and they therefore call for caution for using them as congenic markers in immunologic models.</p>","PeriodicalId":94037,"journal":{"name":"ImmunoHorizons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CD45.1/CD45.2 Congenic Markers Induce a Selective Bias for CD8+ T Cells during Adoptive Lymphocyte Reconstitution in Lymphocytopenia Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Rakhee Rathnam Kalari Kandy, Xiaoxuan Fan, Xuefang Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.4049/immunohorizons.2300014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CD45.1/CD45.2 congenic markers have been used to track hematopoietic lineage differentiation following hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantation. However, several studies suggest that a bias exists in CD45.1 versus CD45.2 hematopoietic cell reconstitution from HSPCs. Meanwhile, no definitive comparison has been reported for mature immune cells as to whether the CD45.1/CD45.2 disparity can skew the immune cell response. In this study, using lymphocytopenia Rag1-/- CD45.2 mice as hosts, we assessed the reconstitution potential of CD45.1 versus CD45.2 lymphocytes following adoptive transfer of mature T and B cells. We have found a selective bias for CD8+ T cells in that CD45.1 cells showed significantly higher reconstitution compared with CD45.2 cells, whereas CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells showed equivalent reconstitution. These results suggest that CD45.1/CD45.2 markers may induce an alloreactive response or a survival bias specific to CD8+ T cells, and they therefore call for caution for using them as congenic markers in immunologic models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ImmunoHorizons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ImmunoHorizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4049/immunohorizons.2300014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ImmunoHorizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4049/immunohorizons.2300014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CD45.1/CD45.2同源标记物已用于追踪造血干细胞和祖细胞(HSPC)移植后的造血谱系分化。然而,几项研究表明,从HSPCs重建CD45.1和CD45.2造血细胞存在偏差。同时,尚未报道成熟免疫细胞的CD45.1/CD45.2差异是否会扭曲免疫细胞反应的确切比较。在本研究中,使用淋巴细胞减少症Rag1-/-CD45.2小鼠作为宿主,我们评估了成熟T和B细胞过继转移后CD45.1和CD45.2淋巴细胞的重建潜力。我们发现CD8+T细胞的选择性偏倚是,与CD45.2细胞相比,CD45.1细胞显示出显著更高的重建,而CD4+T细胞和CD19+B细胞显示出同等的重建。这些结果表明,CD45.1/CD45.2标记物可能诱导CD8+T细胞特异性的同种反应性反应或生存偏倚,因此,在免疫模型中使用它们作为先天性标记物时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CD45.1/CD45.2 Congenic Markers Induce a Selective Bias for CD8+ T Cells during Adoptive Lymphocyte Reconstitution in Lymphocytopenia Mice.

CD45.1/CD45.2 congenic markers have been used to track hematopoietic lineage differentiation following hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantation. However, several studies suggest that a bias exists in CD45.1 versus CD45.2 hematopoietic cell reconstitution from HSPCs. Meanwhile, no definitive comparison has been reported for mature immune cells as to whether the CD45.1/CD45.2 disparity can skew the immune cell response. In this study, using lymphocytopenia Rag1-/- CD45.2 mice as hosts, we assessed the reconstitution potential of CD45.1 versus CD45.2 lymphocytes following adoptive transfer of mature T and B cells. We have found a selective bias for CD8+ T cells in that CD45.1 cells showed significantly higher reconstitution compared with CD45.2 cells, whereas CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells showed equivalent reconstitution. These results suggest that CD45.1/CD45.2 markers may induce an alloreactive response or a survival bias specific to CD8+ T cells, and they therefore call for caution for using them as congenic markers in immunologic models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信