全科医生对全科医生药剂师工作的看法:一项混合方法调查研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2023.2273841
Eoin Hurley, Tony Foley, Elaine Walsh, Stephen Byrne, Kieran Dalton
{"title":"全科医生对全科医生药剂师工作的看法:一项混合方法调查研究。","authors":"Eoin Hurley, Tony Foley, Elaine Walsh, Stephen Byrne, Kieran Dalton","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2023.2273841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists are increasingly incorporated into general practice teams globally and have been shown to positively impact patient outcomes. However, little research to date has focused on determining general practitioners' (GPs') perceptions of practice-based pharmacist roles in countries yet to establish such roles.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore GPs' perceptions towards integrating pharmacists into practices and determine if any significant associations were present between GPs' perceptions and their demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In June 2022, a survey was disseminated to GPs in Ireland <i>via</i> post (<i>n</i> = 500 in Munster region), Twitter, WhatsApp, and an online GP support and education network. Quantitative data were captured through multiple option and Likert-scale questions and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were captured <i>via</i> free-text boxes, with the open comments analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 valid responses were received (24.6% response to postal survey). Overall, GPs welcomed the role of practice-based pharmacists and perceived that they would increase patient safety. Most agreed with practice pharmacists providing medicine information (98%) <i>vs.</i> 23% agreeing with practice pharmacists prescribing independently. Most agreed they would partake in a practice pharmacist pilot (78.6%). The free-text comments described current pressures in general practice, existing relationships with pharmacists, funding and governance strategies, potential roles for pharmacists in general practice, and anticipated outcomes of such roles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a deeper understanding of GPs' perceptions of integrating pharmacists into practices and the demographic characteristics associated with different perceptions, which may help better inform future initiatives to integrate pharmacists into practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GPs' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practices: A mixed methods survey study.\",\"authors\":\"Eoin Hurley, Tony Foley, Elaine Walsh, Stephen Byrne, Kieran Dalton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13814788.2023.2273841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists are increasingly incorporated into general practice teams globally and have been shown to positively impact patient outcomes. However, little research to date has focused on determining general practitioners' (GPs') perceptions of practice-based pharmacist roles in countries yet to establish such roles.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore GPs' perceptions towards integrating pharmacists into practices and determine if any significant associations were present between GPs' perceptions and their demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In June 2022, a survey was disseminated to GPs in Ireland <i>via</i> post (<i>n</i> = 500 in Munster region), Twitter, WhatsApp, and an online GP support and education network. Quantitative data were captured through multiple option and Likert-scale questions and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were captured <i>via</i> free-text boxes, with the open comments analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 valid responses were received (24.6% response to postal survey). Overall, GPs welcomed the role of practice-based pharmacists and perceived that they would increase patient safety. Most agreed with practice pharmacists providing medicine information (98%) <i>vs.</i> 23% agreeing with practice pharmacists prescribing independently. Most agreed they would partake in a practice pharmacist pilot (78.6%). The free-text comments described current pressures in general practice, existing relationships with pharmacists, funding and governance strategies, potential roles for pharmacists in general practice, and anticipated outcomes of such roles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a deeper understanding of GPs' perceptions of integrating pharmacists into practices and the demographic characteristics associated with different perceptions, which may help better inform future initiatives to integrate pharmacists into practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2023.2273841\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2023.2273841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药剂师越来越多地被纳入全球全科医疗团队,并已被证明对患者的结果有积极影响。然而,迄今为止,在尚未确立药剂师角色的国家,很少有研究关注全科医生对基于实践的药剂师角色的看法。目的:探讨全科医生对药剂师融入实践的看法,并确定全科医生的看法与其人口统计学特征之间是否存在任何显著关联。方法:2022年6月,一项调查通过post(n = 明斯特地区500家)、推特、WhatsApp以及在线全科医生支持和教育网络。通过多项选择和Likert量表问题获取定量数据,并使用描述性和推断统计学进行分析。定性数据通过自由文本框获取,开放评论使用反射性主题分析进行分析。结果:共收到152份有效回复(对邮寄调查的回复率为24.6%)。总的来说,全科医生欢迎执业药剂师的作用,并认为他们会提高患者的安全性。大多数人同意执业药剂师提供药物信息(98%),23%的人同意执业药师独立开处方。大多数人同意他们将参加执业药剂师试点(78.6%)。自由文本评论描述了全科医学目前的压力、与药剂师的现有关系、资金和治理策略、药剂师在全科医学中的潜在角色以及这些角色的预期结果。结论:本研究更深入地了解了全科医生对将药剂师融入实践的看法,以及与不同看法相关的人口统计学特征,这可能有助于更好地为未来将药剂师纳入实践的举措提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

GPs' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practices: A mixed methods survey study.

GPs' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practices: A mixed methods survey study.

GPs' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practices: A mixed methods survey study.

GPs' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practices: A mixed methods survey study.

Background: Pharmacists are increasingly incorporated into general practice teams globally and have been shown to positively impact patient outcomes. However, little research to date has focused on determining general practitioners' (GPs') perceptions of practice-based pharmacist roles in countries yet to establish such roles.

Objectives: To explore GPs' perceptions towards integrating pharmacists into practices and determine if any significant associations were present between GPs' perceptions and their demographic characteristics.

Methods: In June 2022, a survey was disseminated to GPs in Ireland via post (n = 500 in Munster region), Twitter, WhatsApp, and an online GP support and education network. Quantitative data were captured through multiple option and Likert-scale questions and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were captured via free-text boxes, with the open comments analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: A total of 152 valid responses were received (24.6% response to postal survey). Overall, GPs welcomed the role of practice-based pharmacists and perceived that they would increase patient safety. Most agreed with practice pharmacists providing medicine information (98%) vs. 23% agreeing with practice pharmacists prescribing independently. Most agreed they would partake in a practice pharmacist pilot (78.6%). The free-text comments described current pressures in general practice, existing relationships with pharmacists, funding and governance strategies, potential roles for pharmacists in general practice, and anticipated outcomes of such roles.

Conclusion: This study provides a deeper understanding of GPs' perceptions of integrating pharmacists into practices and the demographic characteristics associated with different perceptions, which may help better inform future initiatives to integrate pharmacists into practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信