卢旺达有或没有假肢的下肢截肢患者的功能。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
African Journal of Disability Pub Date : 2023-10-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1193
Robert Ngarambe, Jean Baptiste Sagahutu, Assuman Nuhu, David K Tumusiime
{"title":"卢旺达有或没有假肢的下肢截肢患者的功能。","authors":"Robert Ngarambe,&nbsp;Jean Baptiste Sagahutu,&nbsp;Assuman Nuhu,&nbsp;David K Tumusiime","doi":"10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb loss limits functioning and restricts participation in various environments. Persons with lower limb amputations (PLLA) experience challenges ranging from self-care and independence to psychological disorders that negatively impact their functioning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the functioning and the level of disability of PLLA with or without prostheses in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among PLLAs aged 18 years and above in 10 districts of Rwanda. A total of 247 participants were purposively selected to fill the questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential statistics using <i>t</i>-test and binary logistic regression were performed to analyse data using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 21.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 247 PLLA, 99 (40.1%) had prostheses and remaining 148 (59.9%) did not. Majority of PLLA without prostheses reported having more difficulties in mobility (s.d. 3.98), participation (s.d. 5.18) and life activities (s.d. 3.87). The majority of PLLA reported mild and moderate functioning in the domains of cognitive (odds ratio [OR] 8.842, 5.384 with 95% confidence interval [CI]) mobility (OR 16.154, 2.485 with 95% CI) and participation (OR 13.299, 15.282 with 95% CI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persons without prostheses demonstrated reduced level of functioning and high levels of disability compared to those with prostheses in all domains. However, the mobility, self-activities and the participation domains were the mainly affected.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study helps to understand the needs of the PLLA and emphasises that not only having prostheses can improve functioning but also emphasises the psychosocial aspects to reduce disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45606,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Disability","volume":"12 ","pages":"1193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functioning among persons with lower limb amputation with or without prostheses in Rwanda.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Ngarambe,&nbsp;Jean Baptiste Sagahutu,&nbsp;Assuman Nuhu,&nbsp;David K Tumusiime\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limb loss limits functioning and restricts participation in various environments. Persons with lower limb amputations (PLLA) experience challenges ranging from self-care and independence to psychological disorders that negatively impact their functioning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the functioning and the level of disability of PLLA with or without prostheses in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among PLLAs aged 18 years and above in 10 districts of Rwanda. A total of 247 participants were purposively selected to fill the questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential statistics using <i>t</i>-test and binary logistic regression were performed to analyse data using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 21.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 247 PLLA, 99 (40.1%) had prostheses and remaining 148 (59.9%) did not. Majority of PLLA without prostheses reported having more difficulties in mobility (s.d. 3.98), participation (s.d. 5.18) and life activities (s.d. 3.87). The majority of PLLA reported mild and moderate functioning in the domains of cognitive (odds ratio [OR] 8.842, 5.384 with 95% confidence interval [CI]) mobility (OR 16.154, 2.485 with 95% CI) and participation (OR 13.299, 15.282 with 95% CI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persons without prostheses demonstrated reduced level of functioning and high levels of disability compared to those with prostheses in all domains. However, the mobility, self-activities and the participation domains were the mainly affected.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study helps to understand the needs of the PLLA and emphasises that not only having prostheses can improve functioning but also emphasises the psychosocial aspects to reduce disability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Disability\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623480/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肢体丧失限制了功能,并限制了在各种环境中的参与。下肢截肢(PLLA)患者面临的挑战包括自我护理和独立性,以及对其功能产生负面影响的心理障碍。目的:评估卢旺达使用或不使用假肢的PLLA的功能和残疾程度。方法:对卢旺达10个地区18岁及以上的PLLA进行描述性横断面研究。共有247名参与者被有意选择来填写问卷。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)(21.0版)对数据进行描述性和推断性统计,使用t检验和二元逻辑回归。结果:247例PLLA中,99例(40.1%)有假肢,其余148例(59.9%)没有。据报道,大多数没有假体的PLLA在活动方面有更多困难(s.d.3.98),参与度(s.d.5.18)和生活活动(s.d.3.87)。大多数PLLA报告在认知(优势比[OR]8.842,5.384,95%置信区间[CI])、移动性(OR 16.154,2.485,95%CI)和参与度(OR 13.299,15.282,95%CI与在所有领域使用假肢的人相比,残疾率有所下降。但是,流动性、自我活动和参与领域受到的影响最大。贡献:这项研究有助于了解PLLA的需求,并强调使用假肢不仅可以改善功能,还强调了减少残疾的心理社会方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functioning among persons with lower limb amputation with or without prostheses in Rwanda.

Background: Limb loss limits functioning and restricts participation in various environments. Persons with lower limb amputations (PLLA) experience challenges ranging from self-care and independence to psychological disorders that negatively impact their functioning.

Objectives: To assess the functioning and the level of disability of PLLA with or without prostheses in Rwanda.

Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among PLLAs aged 18 years and above in 10 districts of Rwanda. A total of 247 participants were purposively selected to fill the questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential statistics using t-test and binary logistic regression were performed to analyse data using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 21.0).

Results: Out of 247 PLLA, 99 (40.1%) had prostheses and remaining 148 (59.9%) did not. Majority of PLLA without prostheses reported having more difficulties in mobility (s.d. 3.98), participation (s.d. 5.18) and life activities (s.d. 3.87). The majority of PLLA reported mild and moderate functioning in the domains of cognitive (odds ratio [OR] 8.842, 5.384 with 95% confidence interval [CI]) mobility (OR 16.154, 2.485 with 95% CI) and participation (OR 13.299, 15.282 with 95% CI).

Conclusion: Persons without prostheses demonstrated reduced level of functioning and high levels of disability compared to those with prostheses in all domains. However, the mobility, self-activities and the participation domains were the mainly affected.

Contribution: The study helps to understand the needs of the PLLA and emphasises that not only having prostheses can improve functioning but also emphasises the psychosocial aspects to reduce disability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Disability
African Journal of Disability HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Disability, the official journal of CRS, AfriNEAD and CEDRES, introduce and discuss issues and experiences relating to and supporting the act of better understanding the interfaces between disability, poverty and practices of exclusion and marginalisation. Its articles yield new insight into established human development practices, evaluate new educational techniques and disability research, examine current cultural and social discrimination, and bring serious critical analysis to bear on problems shared across the African continent. Emphasis is on all aspects of disability particularity in the developing African context. This includes, amongst others: -disability studies as an emerging field of public health enquiry -rehabilitation, including vocational and community-based rehabilitation -community development and medical issues related to disability and poverty -disability-related stigma and discrimination -inclusive education -legal, policy, human rights and advocacy issues related to disability -the role of arts and media in relation to disability -disability as part of global Sustainable Development Goals transformation agendas -disability and postcolonial issues -globalisation and cultural change in relation to disability -environmental and climate-related issues linked to disability -disability, diversity and intersections of identity -disability and the promotion of human development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信