发作性无耳偏头痛的神经生理学和临床结果:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Manuela Deodato, Antonio Granato, Miriam Martini, Alex Buoite Stella, Alessandra Galmonte, Luigi Murena, Paolo Manganotti
{"title":"发作性无耳偏头痛的神经生理学和临床结果:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Manuela Deodato, Antonio Granato, Miriam Martini, Alex Buoite Stella, Alessandra Galmonte, Luigi Murena, Paolo Manganotti","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess differences between people with episodic migraine and healthy controls in some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes, which, in turn, may highlight the differences in sensory processing, especially in cortical excitability, pain processing, and executive function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed, including the following outcomes: pressure pain thresholds with algometry; resting motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation; and executive functions with the trail making test and the frontal assessment battery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty adults with migraine (36 ± 10 years) and 30 healthy controls (29 ± 14 years) were included in this study. Compared with the healthy controls, participants with migraine presented lower pressure pain thresholds values in all the assessed muscles ( P < 0.001), lower resting motor threshold (-10.5% of the stimulator output, 95% CI: -16.8 to -4.2, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.869) and higher short-interval intracortical inhibition motor-evoked potential's amplitude at 3 ms (0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.46, P = 0.015, Cohen d = 0.662), and worse performances both in trail making test (7.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 13.4, P = 0.027, Cohen d = 0.594) and frontal assessment battery (-1.1, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.5, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.915).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants with migraine presented significant differences in cortical excitability, executive functions, and pressure pain thresholds, compared with healthy controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurophysiological and Clinical Outcomes in Episodic Migraine Without Aura: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Deodato, Antonio Granato, Miriam Martini, Alex Buoite Stella, Alessandra Galmonte, Luigi Murena, Paolo Manganotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess differences between people with episodic migraine and healthy controls in some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes, which, in turn, may highlight the differences in sensory processing, especially in cortical excitability, pain processing, and executive function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed, including the following outcomes: pressure pain thresholds with algometry; resting motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation; and executive functions with the trail making test and the frontal assessment battery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty adults with migraine (36 ± 10 years) and 30 healthy controls (29 ± 14 years) were included in this study. Compared with the healthy controls, participants with migraine presented lower pressure pain thresholds values in all the assessed muscles ( P < 0.001), lower resting motor threshold (-10.5% of the stimulator output, 95% CI: -16.8 to -4.2, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.869) and higher short-interval intracortical inhibition motor-evoked potential's amplitude at 3 ms (0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.46, P = 0.015, Cohen d = 0.662), and worse performances both in trail making test (7.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 13.4, P = 0.027, Cohen d = 0.594) and frontal assessment battery (-1.1, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.5, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.915).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants with migraine presented significant differences in cortical excitability, executive functions, and pressure pain thresholds, compared with healthy controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估发作性偏头痛患者与健康对照组在某些神经生理学和临床结果方面的差异,这反过来可能会突出感觉处理的差异,特别是在皮层兴奋性、疼痛处理和执行功能方面的差异。方法:进行横断面研究,包括以下结果:压力疼痛阈值与算法;静息运动阈值、短时间皮质内抑制和经颅磁刺激的皮质内促进;以及执行功能,包括跟踪测试和正面评估电池。结果:本研究包括30名患有偏头痛的成年人(36±10岁)和30名健康对照者(29±14岁)。与健康对照组相比,偏头痛参与者在所有评估的肌肉中表现出较低的压力-疼痛阈值(P<0.001),较低的静息运动阈值(刺激器输出的-10.5%,95%CI:-16.8至-4.2,P=0.001,Cohen d=0.869)和3ms时较高的短间隔皮层内抑制运动诱发电位振幅(0.25,95%CI:0.05至0.46,P=0.015,Cohen d=0.662),试验测试(7.1,95%CI:0.9-13.4,P=0.027,Cohen d=0.594)和额叶评估组(-1.1,95%CI:1.7-0.5,P=0.001,Cohen d=0.915)的表现均较差。结论:与健康对照组相比,偏头痛参与者在皮层兴奋性、执行功能和压痛阈值方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurophysiological and Clinical Outcomes in Episodic Migraine Without Aura: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess differences between people with episodic migraine and healthy controls in some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes, which, in turn, may highlight the differences in sensory processing, especially in cortical excitability, pain processing, and executive function.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed, including the following outcomes: pressure pain thresholds with algometry; resting motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation; and executive functions with the trail making test and the frontal assessment battery.

Results: Thirty adults with migraine (36 ± 10 years) and 30 healthy controls (29 ± 14 years) were included in this study. Compared with the healthy controls, participants with migraine presented lower pressure pain thresholds values in all the assessed muscles ( P < 0.001), lower resting motor threshold (-10.5% of the stimulator output, 95% CI: -16.8 to -4.2, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.869) and higher short-interval intracortical inhibition motor-evoked potential's amplitude at 3 ms (0.25, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.46, P = 0.015, Cohen d = 0.662), and worse performances both in trail making test (7.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 13.4, P = 0.027, Cohen d = 0.594) and frontal assessment battery (-1.1, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.5, P = 0.001, Cohen d = 0.915).

Conclusions: Participants with migraine presented significant differences in cortical excitability, executive functions, and pressure pain thresholds, compared with healthy controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信