比较CBT和低频rTMS在降低成人强迫症症状严重程度和抑郁以及改善工作记忆方面的有效性:一项临床试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
International Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1080/00207454.2023.2279500
Arash Fazeli, Ahmad Zolghadriha, Reza Pirzeh, Atefeh Fatehi Chenar, Mohsen Dadashi
{"title":"比较CBT和低频rTMS在降低成人强迫症症状严重程度和抑郁以及改善工作记忆方面的有效性:一项临床试验。","authors":"Arash Fazeli, Ahmad Zolghadriha, Reza Pirzeh, Atefeh Fatehi Chenar, Mohsen Dadashi","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2023.2279500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and low-frequency (LF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in reducing symptom severity and depression and improving working memory in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized clinical trial conducted on 24 adults with OCD, randomly assigned into two groups of CBT (<i>n</i> = 12, received CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) individually at 20 sessions) and rTMS (<i>n</i> = 12, received LF (1-Hz) rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 10 sessions). They completed the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and two N-Back tasks before, immediately, and 1 month after interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed a significant difference between the two methods in reducing the severity of OCD symptoms (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and depression (<i>p</i> = 0.002) immediately after interventions where the CBT with ERP was more effective, but no significant difference was found in terms of working memory (<i>p</i> > 0.05). No significant difference was found between groups in any study variables 1 month after interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual CBT with ERP is superior to LF rTMS for reducing the severity of symptoms and depression in OCD patients. However, there is no difference between them in improving working memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1635-1646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the effectiveness of CBT and low-frequency rTMS in reducing symptom severity and depression and improving working memory in adults with OCD: a clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Fazeli, Ahmad Zolghadriha, Reza Pirzeh, Atefeh Fatehi Chenar, Mohsen Dadashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207454.2023.2279500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and low-frequency (LF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in reducing symptom severity and depression and improving working memory in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized clinical trial conducted on 24 adults with OCD, randomly assigned into two groups of CBT (<i>n</i> = 12, received CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) individually at 20 sessions) and rTMS (<i>n</i> = 12, received LF (1-Hz) rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 10 sessions). They completed the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and two N-Back tasks before, immediately, and 1 month after interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed a significant difference between the two methods in reducing the severity of OCD symptoms (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and depression (<i>p</i> = 0.002) immediately after interventions where the CBT with ERP was more effective, but no significant difference was found in terms of working memory (<i>p</i> > 0.05). No significant difference was found between groups in any study variables 1 month after interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual CBT with ERP is superior to LF rTMS for reducing the severity of symptoms and depression in OCD patients. However, there is no difference between them in improving working memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1635-1646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2023.2279500\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2023.2279500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较认知行为疗法(CBT)和低频(LF)重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在降低成人强迫症(OCD)患者症状严重程度、抑郁和改善工作记忆方面的有效性,随机分为两组CBT(n = 12,在20个疗程中单独接受CBT和暴露和反应预防(ERP))和rTMS(n = 12在10个疗程中通过右背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)接受LF(1-Hz)rTMS)。他们在干预前、干预后立即和干预后一个月完成了Yale-Brown强迫症量表、Hamilton抑郁评定量表和两项N-Back任务。结果:结果显示,两种方法在减轻强迫症症状严重程度方面有显著差异(p  0.05)。干预后一个月,各组之间的任何研究变量均无显著差异。结论:个体CBT联合ERP在减轻强迫症患者症状和抑郁方面优于LF rTMS。然而,它们在提高工作记忆方面没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the effectiveness of CBT and low-frequency rTMS in reducing symptom severity and depression and improving working memory in adults with OCD: a clinical trial.

Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and low-frequency (LF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in reducing symptom severity and depression and improving working memory in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Methods: This is a randomized clinical trial conducted on 24 adults with OCD, randomly assigned into two groups of CBT (n = 12, received CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) individually at 20 sessions) and rTMS (n = 12, received LF (1-Hz) rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 10 sessions). They completed the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and two N-Back tasks before, immediately, and 1 month after interventions.

Results: Results showed a significant difference between the two methods in reducing the severity of OCD symptoms (p < 0.05) and depression (p = 0.002) immediately after interventions where the CBT with ERP was more effective, but no significant difference was found in terms of working memory (p > 0.05). No significant difference was found between groups in any study variables 1 month after interventions.

Conclusion: Individual CBT with ERP is superior to LF rTMS for reducing the severity of symptoms and depression in OCD patients. However, there is no difference between them in improving working memory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信