使用Oxiris®过滤器对需要持续肾脏替代治疗的新冠肺炎危重患者进行体外血液净化。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mohamed Abdelaty, Adham Mohamed, Mohamed O Saad, Hassan Mitwally, Mohamad M Alkadi, Ahmed Hashim, Hassan Al Malki, Husain S Ali, Ahmed Soliman Mohamed, Emad Mustafa, Abdulaziz Alalawi, Moustafa Elshafei, Muftah Othman, Mohamad Khatib, Abdul-Salam Ibrahim
{"title":"使用Oxiris®过滤器对需要持续肾脏替代治疗的新冠肺炎危重患者进行体外血液净化。","authors":"Mohamed Abdelaty, Adham Mohamed, Mohamed O Saad, Hassan Mitwally, Mohamad M Alkadi, Ahmed Hashim, Hassan Al Malki, Husain S Ali, Ahmed Soliman Mohamed, Emad Mustafa, Abdulaziz Alalawi, Moustafa Elshafei, Muftah Othman, Mohamad Khatib, Abdul-Salam Ibrahim","doi":"10.1177/03913988231207716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe COVID-19 is associated with a dysregulated immune response that usually leads to cytokine release syndrome. This study aimed to compare the use of extracorporeal blood purification therapy (Oxiris<sup>®</sup>) versus standard continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically-ill patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a national, multicenter, retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between March and October 2020 who required CRRT. Patients were categorized into two groups: Oxiris<sup>®</sup> CRRT and standard CRRT. The primary outcome was the number of patients alive and ventilator-free at 30-days post-CRRT treatment. Key secondary endpoints included change in inflammatory markers, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio at 24- and 72-h post Oxiris<sup>®</sup> initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five patients received Oxiris<sup>®</sup> CRRT and 23 patients received standard CRRT. The primary outcome was 31.4% in the Oxiris<sup>®</sup> group versus 4.3% in the standard CRRT group (adjusted odds ratio 5.97, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-55.6; <i>p</i> = 0.117). In the Oxiris<sup>®</sup> group, interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations significantly decreased at 24 and 72-h (<i>p</i> = 0.033) and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio significantly increased at 24 and 72 h after Oxiris<sup>®</sup> initiation (<i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no significant change in SOFA scores at 24- and 72-h after Oxiris<sup>®</sup> initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of patients alive and ventilator-free at 30-days was higher in the Oxiris<sup>®</sup> group than that in the standard CRRT group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for the baseline severity of illness. There was a significant reduction in IL-6 and significant improvement in PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio after Oxiris<sup>®</sup> CRRT initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal blood purification with Oxiris<sup>®</sup> filter in critically ill patients with COVID-19 requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdelaty, Adham Mohamed, Mohamed O Saad, Hassan Mitwally, Mohamad M Alkadi, Ahmed Hashim, Hassan Al Malki, Husain S Ali, Ahmed Soliman Mohamed, Emad Mustafa, Abdulaziz Alalawi, Moustafa Elshafei, Muftah Othman, Mohamad Khatib, Abdul-Salam Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03913988231207716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe COVID-19 is associated with a dysregulated immune response that usually leads to cytokine release syndrome. This study aimed to compare the use of extracorporeal blood purification therapy (Oxiris<sup>®</sup>) versus standard continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically-ill patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a national, multicenter, retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between March and October 2020 who required CRRT. Patients were categorized into two groups: Oxiris<sup>®</sup> CRRT and standard CRRT. The primary outcome was the number of patients alive and ventilator-free at 30-days post-CRRT treatment. Key secondary endpoints included change in inflammatory markers, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio at 24- and 72-h post Oxiris<sup>®</sup> initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five patients received Oxiris<sup>®</sup> CRRT and 23 patients received standard CRRT. The primary outcome was 31.4% in the Oxiris<sup>®</sup> group versus 4.3% in the standard CRRT group (adjusted odds ratio 5.97, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-55.6; <i>p</i> = 0.117). In the Oxiris<sup>®</sup> group, interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations significantly decreased at 24 and 72-h (<i>p</i> = 0.033) and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio significantly increased at 24 and 72 h after Oxiris<sup>®</sup> initiation (<i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no significant change in SOFA scores at 24- and 72-h after Oxiris<sup>®</sup> initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of patients alive and ventilator-free at 30-days was higher in the Oxiris<sup>®</sup> group than that in the standard CRRT group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for the baseline severity of illness. There was a significant reduction in IL-6 and significant improvement in PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio after Oxiris<sup>®</sup> CRRT initiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988231207716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988231207716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:严重的新冠肺炎与免疫反应失调有关,通常会导致细胞因子释放综合征。本研究旨在比较体外血液净化治疗(Oxiris®)与标准连续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)在重症COVID-19危重患者中的应用。患者分为两组:Oxiris®CRRT和标准CRRT。主要结果是CRRT治疗后30天存活且无呼吸机的患者人数。关键的次要终点包括Oxiris®启动后24小时和72小时炎症标志物、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和PaO2/FiO2比率的变化。结果:35名患者接受Oxiris®CRRT治疗,23名患者接受标准CRRT治疗。Oxiris®组的主要转归为31.4%,而标准CRRT组为4.3%(调整比值比5.97,95%置信区间[CI],0.64-55.6;p = 0.117)。在Oxiris®组中,白细胞介素-6(IL-6)浓度在24小时和72小时显著降低(p = 0.033),并且PaO2/FiO2比率在24和72时显著增加 Oxiris®引发后h(p = 0.001)。Oxiris®启动后24小时和72小时,SOFA评分没有显著变化。结论:Oxiris®组在30天时存活且无呼吸机的患者人数高于标准CRRT组;然而,在调整了疾病的基线严重程度后,这一差异没有达到统计学意义。Oxiris®CRRT启动后,IL-6显著降低,PaO2/FiO2比值显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracorporeal blood purification with Oxiris® filter in critically ill patients with COVID-19 requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.

Introduction: Severe COVID-19 is associated with a dysregulated immune response that usually leads to cytokine release syndrome. This study aimed to compare the use of extracorporeal blood purification therapy (Oxiris®) versus standard continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically-ill patients with severe COVID-19.

Methods: This was a national, multicenter, retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between March and October 2020 who required CRRT. Patients were categorized into two groups: Oxiris® CRRT and standard CRRT. The primary outcome was the number of patients alive and ventilator-free at 30-days post-CRRT treatment. Key secondary endpoints included change in inflammatory markers, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 24- and 72-h post Oxiris® initiation.

Results: Thirty-five patients received Oxiris® CRRT and 23 patients received standard CRRT. The primary outcome was 31.4% in the Oxiris® group versus 4.3% in the standard CRRT group (adjusted odds ratio 5.97, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-55.6; p = 0.117). In the Oxiris® group, interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations significantly decreased at 24 and 72-h (p = 0.033) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly increased at 24 and 72 h after Oxiris® initiation (p = 0.001). There was no significant change in SOFA scores at 24- and 72-h after Oxiris® initiation.

Conclusion: The number of patients alive and ventilator-free at 30-days was higher in the Oxiris® group than that in the standard CRRT group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for the baseline severity of illness. There was a significant reduction in IL-6 and significant improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio after Oxiris® CRRT initiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Organs
International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信