双极性髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折后髋臼侵蚀:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
HIP International Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1177/11207000231208666
George A Macheras, Dimitrios Pallis, Konstantinos Tsivelekas, Margarita M Ampadiotaki, Panagiotis Lepetsos, Dimitrios Tzefronis, Konstantinos Kateros, Stamatios A Papadakis
{"title":"双极性髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折后髋臼侵蚀:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"George A Macheras, Dimitrios Pallis, Konstantinos Tsivelekas, Margarita M Ampadiotaki, Panagiotis Lepetsos, Dimitrios Tzefronis, Konstantinos Kateros, Stamatios A Papadakis","doi":"10.1177/11207000231208666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice between total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) to treat displaced femoral neck fractures, particularly among the elderly, is still controversial. Acetabular erosion consists of a late multifactorial process that may happen after hip HA resulting in significant postoperative burden. This study aims to investigate the impact of acetabular erosion progress after hip HA in patients over 70 years old.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a 5-year (2013-2018) retrospective study including consecutive series of patients >70 years who were treated with bipolar hip HA for femoral neck fractures. Patients were categorised into 3 groups for analysis (A = 70-75 years, B = 75-80 years, C = >80 years). The study enrolled a total number of 813 patients who met the inclusion criteria. We assessed acetabular erosion through radiological examinations and measured functional deterioration using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Our comprehensive investigation extended over a maximum period of 5 years. The correlation of patients' characteristics and HA features on erosion progress was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in sex distribution, injury side, BMI, ASA score, bipolar head diameter, mHHS and leg-length discrepancy among the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). During the follow-up period, acetabular erosion with consequential conversion to THA was observed in 6.13%, 4.22% and 1.96% for Groups A, B and C respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A statistically significant difference of acetabular erosion was observed in Group A compared to patients of Group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age constitutes a significant factor of acetabular wear after HA in the elderly. The higher rate of acetabular wear in patients <75 years suggests that THA is a more viable option, as HA is for patients >80 years old.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"402-408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acetabular erosion after bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"George A Macheras, Dimitrios Pallis, Konstantinos Tsivelekas, Margarita M Ampadiotaki, Panagiotis Lepetsos, Dimitrios Tzefronis, Konstantinos Kateros, Stamatios A Papadakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11207000231208666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice between total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) to treat displaced femoral neck fractures, particularly among the elderly, is still controversial. Acetabular erosion consists of a late multifactorial process that may happen after hip HA resulting in significant postoperative burden. This study aims to investigate the impact of acetabular erosion progress after hip HA in patients over 70 years old.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a 5-year (2013-2018) retrospective study including consecutive series of patients >70 years who were treated with bipolar hip HA for femoral neck fractures. Patients were categorised into 3 groups for analysis (A = 70-75 years, B = 75-80 years, C = >80 years). The study enrolled a total number of 813 patients who met the inclusion criteria. We assessed acetabular erosion through radiological examinations and measured functional deterioration using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Our comprehensive investigation extended over a maximum period of 5 years. The correlation of patients' characteristics and HA features on erosion progress was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in sex distribution, injury side, BMI, ASA score, bipolar head diameter, mHHS and leg-length discrepancy among the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). During the follow-up period, acetabular erosion with consequential conversion to THA was observed in 6.13%, 4.22% and 1.96% for Groups A, B and C respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A statistically significant difference of acetabular erosion was observed in Group A compared to patients of Group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age constitutes a significant factor of acetabular wear after HA in the elderly. The higher rate of acetabular wear in patients <75 years suggests that THA is a more viable option, as HA is for patients >80 years old.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIP International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"402-408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIP International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000231208666\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000231208666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择全髋关节置换术(THA)和半髋关节置换术治疗移位股骨颈骨折,尤其是在老年人中,仍然存在争议。髋臼侵蚀是一个后期的多因素过程,可能发生在髋关节置换术后,导致显著的术后负担。本研究旨在探讨70岁以上患者髋关节置换术后髋臼侵蚀进展的影响 岁材料和方法:这是一项为期5年(2013-2018)的回顾性研究,包括70岁以上的连续系列患者 年,接受双相髋关节HA治疗股骨颈骨折。将患者分为3组进行分析(A = 70-75 年,B = 75-80 年,C = >80 年)。该研究共招募了813名符合入选标准的患者。我们通过放射学检查评估髋臼侵蚀,并在6岁和12岁时使用改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)测量功能恶化 随访数月。我们的全面调查最长持续了5年 年。评估患者特征和HA特征与侵蚀进展的相关性。结果:两组患者的性别分布、损伤侧、BMI、ASA评分、双相头径、mHHS和腿长差异无统计学意义(p > 在随访期间,A组、B组和C组分别有6.13%、4.22%和1.96%的髋臼侵蚀伴THA转化(p = 0.009)。与C组患者相比,A组患者的髋臼侵蚀有统计学上的显著差异。结论:年龄是老年人HA后髋臼磨损的重要因素。80岁患者髋臼磨损率较高 岁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acetabular erosion after bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective study.

Background: The choice between total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) to treat displaced femoral neck fractures, particularly among the elderly, is still controversial. Acetabular erosion consists of a late multifactorial process that may happen after hip HA resulting in significant postoperative burden. This study aims to investigate the impact of acetabular erosion progress after hip HA in patients over 70 years old.

Materials and methods: This is a 5-year (2013-2018) retrospective study including consecutive series of patients >70 years who were treated with bipolar hip HA for femoral neck fractures. Patients were categorised into 3 groups for analysis (A = 70-75 years, B = 75-80 years, C = >80 years). The study enrolled a total number of 813 patients who met the inclusion criteria. We assessed acetabular erosion through radiological examinations and measured functional deterioration using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Our comprehensive investigation extended over a maximum period of 5 years. The correlation of patients' characteristics and HA features on erosion progress was assessed.

Results: There were no significant differences in sex distribution, injury side, BMI, ASA score, bipolar head diameter, mHHS and leg-length discrepancy among the groups (p > 0.05). During the follow-up period, acetabular erosion with consequential conversion to THA was observed in 6.13%, 4.22% and 1.96% for Groups A, B and C respectively (p = 0.009). A statistically significant difference of acetabular erosion was observed in Group A compared to patients of Group C.

Conclusions: Age constitutes a significant factor of acetabular wear after HA in the elderly. The higher rate of acetabular wear in patients <75 years suggests that THA is a more viable option, as HA is for patients >80 years old.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信