改善癌症成人患者支持网络(iCAN):一项关于沟通模式和改进焦点小组的试点研究。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223168
Giuseppina Campisi, Monica Bazzano, Rodolfo Mauceri, Vera Panzarella, Gaetano La Mantia, Olga Di Fede
{"title":"改善癌症成人患者支持网络(iCAN):一项关于沟通模式和改进焦点小组的试点研究。","authors":"Giuseppina Campisi, Monica Bazzano, Rodolfo Mauceri, Vera Panzarella, Gaetano La Mantia, Olga Di Fede","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many consider that cancer has the greatest impact of any disease in the world, and it can drastically limit patients' quality of life. Combating such a life-threatening disease can pose many challenges to daily life, highlighted by demonstrating the need to discuss one's health status within a focus group and encourage treatment compliance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>the purposes of this study were to share the authors' experience of a modified focus group in an Oral Medicine Unit, termed \"Improving Cancer Adult Patients Support Network\" (iCAN), and to evaluate how effective communication could improve patients' quality of life and empower them by virtue of enhanced knowledge and an awareness of cancer management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>the paper adhered to the COREQ checklist regarding its reporting procedures. The iCAN format was precisely reproduced four times with four groups, consisting of 12 adult male and female patients with solid cancers. They discussed several main topics relating to cancer treatment, as chosen by a majority of the participants. Four specialists were involved in the discussion of the selected topics The iCAN format was faithfully reproduced during each meeting, with the participants in the roles of moderator and health specialists. Finally, a satisfaction questionnaire was administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the most reliable results demonstrated a marked change in lifestyle and eating habits in more than 50% of participants. More than 80% were unaware of the side effects of cancer treatments in general and the oral mucosa in particular. Each meeting reported a maximum degree of satisfaction experienced by the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>iCAN focus group meetings appear to have facilitated a process of narrative interviewing, thereby improving the doctor-patient relationship underlying the humanization of the care process.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1223168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the cancer adult patient support network (iCAN): a pilot study on a communication model and modified focus group.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppina Campisi, Monica Bazzano, Rodolfo Mauceri, Vera Panzarella, Gaetano La Mantia, Olga Di Fede\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many consider that cancer has the greatest impact of any disease in the world, and it can drastically limit patients' quality of life. Combating such a life-threatening disease can pose many challenges to daily life, highlighted by demonstrating the need to discuss one's health status within a focus group and encourage treatment compliance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>the purposes of this study were to share the authors' experience of a modified focus group in an Oral Medicine Unit, termed \\\"Improving Cancer Adult Patients Support Network\\\" (iCAN), and to evaluate how effective communication could improve patients' quality of life and empower them by virtue of enhanced knowledge and an awareness of cancer management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>the paper adhered to the COREQ checklist regarding its reporting procedures. The iCAN format was precisely reproduced four times with four groups, consisting of 12 adult male and female patients with solid cancers. They discussed several main topics relating to cancer treatment, as chosen by a majority of the participants. Four specialists were involved in the discussion of the selected topics The iCAN format was faithfully reproduced during each meeting, with the participants in the roles of moderator and health specialists. Finally, a satisfaction questionnaire was administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the most reliable results demonstrated a marked change in lifestyle and eating habits in more than 50% of participants. More than 80% were unaware of the side effects of cancer treatments in general and the oral mucosa in particular. Each meeting reported a maximum degree of satisfaction experienced by the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>iCAN focus group meetings appear to have facilitated a process of narrative interviewing, thereby improving the doctor-patient relationship underlying the humanization of the care process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"1223168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多人认为癌症是世界上影响最大的疾病,它会极大地限制患者的生活质量。与这种危及生命的疾病作斗争可能会给日常生活带来许多挑战,这突出表现在需要在焦点小组中讨论自己的健康状况,并鼓励遵守治疗规定。目的:本研究的目的是分享作者在口腔医学部门的一个名为“改善癌症成人患者支持网络”(iCAN)的改良焦点小组的经验,并评估有效的沟通如何通过提高癌症管理的知识和意识来改善患者的生活质量和增强他们的能力。方法:论文遵循COREQ检查表中关于报告程序的规定。iCAN格式被精确复制了四次,分四组,由12名患有实体癌的成年男性和女性患者组成。他们讨论了大多数参与者选择的与癌症治疗有关的几个主要话题。四名专家参与了对选定主题的讨论。每次会议都忠实地复制了iCAN格式,参与者担任主持人和卫生专家。最后,进行了满意度问卷调查。结果:最可靠的结果表明,超过50%的参与者的生活方式和饮食习惯发生了显著变化。超过80%的人不知道癌症治疗的副作用,尤其是口腔粘膜。每次会议都报告了与会者的最大满意度。结论:iCAN焦点小组会议似乎促进了叙述性访谈的过程,从而改善了护理过程人性化的医患关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the cancer adult patient support network (iCAN): a pilot study on a communication model and modified focus group.

Background: Many consider that cancer has the greatest impact of any disease in the world, and it can drastically limit patients' quality of life. Combating such a life-threatening disease can pose many challenges to daily life, highlighted by demonstrating the need to discuss one's health status within a focus group and encourage treatment compliance.

Aim: the purposes of this study were to share the authors' experience of a modified focus group in an Oral Medicine Unit, termed "Improving Cancer Adult Patients Support Network" (iCAN), and to evaluate how effective communication could improve patients' quality of life and empower them by virtue of enhanced knowledge and an awareness of cancer management.

Methods: the paper adhered to the COREQ checklist regarding its reporting procedures. The iCAN format was precisely reproduced four times with four groups, consisting of 12 adult male and female patients with solid cancers. They discussed several main topics relating to cancer treatment, as chosen by a majority of the participants. Four specialists were involved in the discussion of the selected topics The iCAN format was faithfully reproduced during each meeting, with the participants in the roles of moderator and health specialists. Finally, a satisfaction questionnaire was administered.

Results: the most reliable results demonstrated a marked change in lifestyle and eating habits in more than 50% of participants. More than 80% were unaware of the side effects of cancer treatments in general and the oral mucosa in particular. Each meeting reported a maximum degree of satisfaction experienced by the participants.

Conclusion: iCAN focus group meetings appear to have facilitated a process of narrative interviewing, thereby improving the doctor-patient relationship underlying the humanization of the care process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信