患者拍摄的慢性荨麻疹的智能手机照片质量良好,在临床上很有用。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-04 DOI:10.1159/000535027
Zarqa Ali, Jennifer Astrup Sørensen, Ditte Georgina Zhang, Misbah Noshela Ghazanfar, Johan Anker Chrom Allerup, Marcus Maurer, Emek Kocatürk, Christian Vestergaard, Simon Francis Thomsen
{"title":"患者拍摄的慢性荨麻疹的智能手机照片质量良好,在临床上很有用。","authors":"Zarqa Ali, Jennifer Astrup Sørensen, Ditte Georgina Zhang, Misbah Noshela Ghazanfar, Johan Anker Chrom Allerup, Marcus Maurer, Emek Kocatürk, Christian Vestergaard, Simon Francis Thomsen","doi":"10.1159/000535027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic urticaria (CU) is characterized by transient wheals and angioedema, which are often not present when patients see their treating physician.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of smartphone photographs captured by patients prior to their first visit at an urticaria outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey regarding the quality and utility of smartphone photographs of urticarial skin lesions in patients with CU attending the outpatient clinic for the first time was conducted. Up to three random patient-selected photographs of skin lesions were evaluated by a physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 148 patients, 118 (79.7%) had taken photographs of their skin lesions prior to the consultation, and 75% took photographs with the intention of presenting it to their physician. The photographs were of wheals in 90% of the cases and angioedema in 8%. In total, 72% of the smartphone photographs had the skin lesion in focus, 64% had good resolution, and 48% had good lighting. Only 9% of the smartphone photographs were blurred, 10% had bad lighting, 4% had bad resolution, and 8% did not have the lesion in focus. Moreover, 86% of the smartphone photographs were found to be useful for clinical evaluation. At least one photograph of good/very good quality was presented by 86% of the patients, and 97% had at least one photograph that was useful for clinical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with CU often take smartphone photographs of their skin lesions on their own initiative prior to their first consultation to present the photographs to their physician. These smartphone photographs are very often of good quality and suitable for clinical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"357-361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartphone Photographs of Chronic Urticaria Taken by Patients Are of Good Quality and Useful in the Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Zarqa Ali, Jennifer Astrup Sørensen, Ditte Georgina Zhang, Misbah Noshela Ghazanfar, Johan Anker Chrom Allerup, Marcus Maurer, Emek Kocatürk, Christian Vestergaard, Simon Francis Thomsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic urticaria (CU) is characterized by transient wheals and angioedema, which are often not present when patients see their treating physician.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of smartphone photographs captured by patients prior to their first visit at an urticaria outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey regarding the quality and utility of smartphone photographs of urticarial skin lesions in patients with CU attending the outpatient clinic for the first time was conducted. Up to three random patient-selected photographs of skin lesions were evaluated by a physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 148 patients, 118 (79.7%) had taken photographs of their skin lesions prior to the consultation, and 75% took photographs with the intention of presenting it to their physician. The photographs were of wheals in 90% of the cases and angioedema in 8%. In total, 72% of the smartphone photographs had the skin lesion in focus, 64% had good resolution, and 48% had good lighting. Only 9% of the smartphone photographs were blurred, 10% had bad lighting, 4% had bad resolution, and 8% did not have the lesion in focus. Moreover, 86% of the smartphone photographs were found to be useful for clinical evaluation. At least one photograph of good/very good quality was presented by 86% of the patients, and 97% had at least one photograph that was useful for clinical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with CU often take smartphone photographs of their skin lesions on their own initiative prior to their first consultation to present the photographs to their physician. These smartphone photographs are very often of good quality and suitable for clinical evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"357-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性荨麻疹(CU)以短暂性风团和血管性水肿为特征,患者在就诊时通常不会出现这些症状。目的:评估患者首次到荨麻疹门诊就诊前拍摄的智能手机照片的诊断价值。方法:对首次到门诊就诊的CU患者的荨麻疹皮肤病变的智能手机照片的质量和实用性进行调查。医生对多达三张随机选择的患者皮肤损伤照片进行了评估。结果:在148名患者中,118人(79.7%)在咨询前拍摄了他们的皮肤损伤照片,75%的患者拍摄照片是为了向医生展示。照片显示90%的病例为风团,8%为血管性水肿。总的来说,72%的智能手机照片聚焦了皮肤损伤,64%的照片分辨率良好,48%的照片照明良好。只有9%的智能手机照片模糊,10%的照片光线不好,4%的照片分辨率不好,8%的照片没有聚焦。此外,86%的智能手机照片被发现对临床评估有用。86%的患者至少提供了一张质量良好/非常好的照片,97%的患者至少有一张照片可用于临床评估。结论:CU患者通常会在第一次就诊前主动在智能手机上拍摄皮肤病变的照片,并将照片提交给医生。这些智能手机照片通常质量良好,适合临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smartphone Photographs of Chronic Urticaria Taken by Patients Are of Good Quality and Useful in the Clinic.

Background: Chronic urticaria (CU) is characterized by transient wheals and angioedema, which are often not present when patients see their treating physician.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of smartphone photographs captured by patients prior to their first visit at an urticaria outpatient clinic.

Methods: A survey regarding the quality and utility of smartphone photographs of urticarial skin lesions in patients with CU attending the outpatient clinic for the first time was conducted. Up to three random patient-selected photographs of skin lesions were evaluated by a physician.

Results: Of 148 patients, 118 (79.7%) had taken photographs of their skin lesions prior to the consultation, and 75% took photographs with the intention of presenting it to their physician. The photographs were of wheals in 90% of the cases and angioedema in 8%. In total, 72% of the smartphone photographs had the skin lesion in focus, 64% had good resolution, and 48% had good lighting. Only 9% of the smartphone photographs were blurred, 10% had bad lighting, 4% had bad resolution, and 8% did not have the lesion in focus. Moreover, 86% of the smartphone photographs were found to be useful for clinical evaluation. At least one photograph of good/very good quality was presented by 86% of the patients, and 97% had at least one photograph that was useful for clinical evaluation.

Conclusion: Patients with CU often take smartphone photographs of their skin lesions on their own initiative prior to their first consultation to present the photographs to their physician. These smartphone photographs are very often of good quality and suitable for clinical evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信