ChatGPT和Bard在官方第1部分FRCOphth练习问题上的表现。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Thomas Fowler, Simon Pullen, Liam Birkett
{"title":"ChatGPT和Bard在官方第1部分FRCOphth练习问题上的表现。","authors":"Thomas Fowler, Simon Pullen, Liam Birkett","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-324091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a large language model by OpenAI, and Bard, Google's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, have been evaluated in various contexts. This study aims to assess these models' proficiency in the part 1 Fellowship of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (FRCOphth) Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) examination, highlighting their potential in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both models were tested on a sample question bank for the part 1 FRCOphth MCQ exam. Their performances were compared with historical human performance on the exam, focusing on the ability to comprehend, retain and apply information related to ophthalmology. We also tested it on the book 'MCQs for FRCOpth part 1', and assessed its performance across subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT demonstrated a strong performance, surpassing historical human pass marks and examination performance, while Bard underperformed. The comparison indicates the potential of certain AI models to match, and even exceed, human standards in such tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate the potential of AI models, such as ChatGPT, in processing and applying medical knowledge at a postgraduate level. However, performance varied among different models, highlighting the importance of appropriate AI selection. The study underlines the potential for AI applications in medical education and the necessity for further investigation into their strengths and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of ChatGPT and Bard on the official part 1 FRCOphth practice questions.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Fowler, Simon Pullen, Liam Birkett\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2023-324091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a large language model by OpenAI, and Bard, Google's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, have been evaluated in various contexts. This study aims to assess these models' proficiency in the part 1 Fellowship of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (FRCOphth) Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) examination, highlighting their potential in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both models were tested on a sample question bank for the part 1 FRCOphth MCQ exam. Their performances were compared with historical human performance on the exam, focusing on the ability to comprehend, retain and apply information related to ophthalmology. We also tested it on the book 'MCQs for FRCOpth part 1', and assessed its performance across subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT demonstrated a strong performance, surpassing historical human pass marks and examination performance, while Bard underperformed. The comparison indicates the potential of certain AI models to match, and even exceed, human standards in such tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate the potential of AI models, such as ChatGPT, in processing and applying medical knowledge at a postgraduate level. However, performance varied among different models, highlighting the importance of appropriate AI selection. The study underlines the potential for AI applications in medical education and the necessity for further investigation into their strengths and limitations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:OpenAI的大型语言模型Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer(ChatGPT)和谷歌的人工智能聊天机器人Bard已经在各种背景下进行了评估。本研究旨在评估这些模型在英国皇家眼科学院第一部分奖学金(FRCOphth)多项选择题(MCQ)考试中的熟练程度,突出其在医学教育中的潜力。方法:在第1部分FRCOphth MCQ考试的样本题库上测试这两种模型。将它们的表现与历史人类在考试中的表现进行比较,重点是理解、保留和应用眼科相关信息的能力。我们还在《FRCOpth第1部分的MCQ》一书中对其进行了测试,并评估了其在各受试者中的表现。结果:ChatGPT表现强劲,超过了历史人类及格分数和考试成绩,而Bard表现不佳。这一比较表明,某些人工智能模型在此类任务中有可能达到甚至超过人类标准。结论:研究结果证明了人工智能模型(如ChatGPT)在研究生水平处理和应用医学知识方面的潜力。然而,不同型号的性能各不相同,突出了适当的人工智能选择的重要性。这项研究强调了人工智能在医学教育中应用的潜力,以及进一步研究其优势和局限性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of ChatGPT and Bard on the official part 1 FRCOphth practice questions.

Background: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a large language model by OpenAI, and Bard, Google's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, have been evaluated in various contexts. This study aims to assess these models' proficiency in the part 1 Fellowship of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (FRCOphth) Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) examination, highlighting their potential in medical education.

Methods: Both models were tested on a sample question bank for the part 1 FRCOphth MCQ exam. Their performances were compared with historical human performance on the exam, focusing on the ability to comprehend, retain and apply information related to ophthalmology. We also tested it on the book 'MCQs for FRCOpth part 1', and assessed its performance across subjects.

Results: ChatGPT demonstrated a strong performance, surpassing historical human pass marks and examination performance, while Bard underperformed. The comparison indicates the potential of certain AI models to match, and even exceed, human standards in such tasks.

Conclusion: The results demonstrate the potential of AI models, such as ChatGPT, in processing and applying medical knowledge at a postgraduate level. However, performance varied among different models, highlighting the importance of appropriate AI selection. The study underlines the potential for AI applications in medical education and the necessity for further investigation into their strengths and limitations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信