Michaela Leštáková, Kevin T. Logan, Imke-Sophie Rehm, Peter F. Pelz, John Friesen
{"title":"配水系统的恢复力指标真的能评估恢复力吗?批判性评论","authors":"Michaela Leštáková, Kevin T. Logan, Imke-Sophie Rehm, Peter F. Pelz, John Friesen","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2023.120820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Having become vital to satisfying basic human needs, water distribution systems (WDSs) are considered critical infrastructure. They are vulnerable to critical events such as extreme weather, natural and man-made disasters, armed conflicts etc. To account for critical events during design and operation of WDSs, the concept of resilience is frequently mentioned. How resilience of WDSs can be assessed using resilience metrics has been the subject of research of many publications. The aim of this paper is to inspect the alignment between a general understanding of resilience in WDSs and the metrics used for their resilience assessment. A novel framework for categorising resilience metrics for WDSs is presented. A literature review of resilience metrics for WDSs is performed and the results are analysed using the developed framework. The results show that the existing resilience metrics are not able to capture resilience in its complexityresilience metrics do not really assess resilience of the WDSs as a whole, but rather focus only on specific functions and properties which can make the WDSs resilient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 120820"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605/pdfft?md5=fbc45776453af53b38b7ffed97c0da9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0043135423012605-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do resilience metrics of water distribution systems really assess resilience? A critical review\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Leštáková, Kevin T. Logan, Imke-Sophie Rehm, Peter F. Pelz, John Friesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2023.120820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Having become vital to satisfying basic human needs, water distribution systems (WDSs) are considered critical infrastructure. They are vulnerable to critical events such as extreme weather, natural and man-made disasters, armed conflicts etc. To account for critical events during design and operation of WDSs, the concept of resilience is frequently mentioned. How resilience of WDSs can be assessed using resilience metrics has been the subject of research of many publications. The aim of this paper is to inspect the alignment between a general understanding of resilience in WDSs and the metrics used for their resilience assessment. A novel framework for categorising resilience metrics for WDSs is presented. A literature review of resilience metrics for WDSs is performed and the results are analysed using the developed framework. The results show that the existing resilience metrics are not able to capture resilience in its complexityresilience metrics do not really assess resilience of the WDSs as a whole, but rather focus only on specific functions and properties which can make the WDSs resilient.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":\"248 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605/pdfft?md5=fbc45776453af53b38b7ffed97c0da9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0043135423012605-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do resilience metrics of water distribution systems really assess resilience? A critical review
Having become vital to satisfying basic human needs, water distribution systems (WDSs) are considered critical infrastructure. They are vulnerable to critical events such as extreme weather, natural and man-made disasters, armed conflicts etc. To account for critical events during design and operation of WDSs, the concept of resilience is frequently mentioned. How resilience of WDSs can be assessed using resilience metrics has been the subject of research of many publications. The aim of this paper is to inspect the alignment between a general understanding of resilience in WDSs and the metrics used for their resilience assessment. A novel framework for categorising resilience metrics for WDSs is presented. A literature review of resilience metrics for WDSs is performed and the results are analysed using the developed framework. The results show that the existing resilience metrics are not able to capture resilience in its complexityresilience metrics do not really assess resilience of the WDSs as a whole, but rather focus only on specific functions and properties which can make the WDSs resilient.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.