配水系统的恢复力指标真的能评估恢复力吗?批判性评论

IF 11.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Michaela Leštáková, Kevin T. Logan, Imke-Sophie Rehm, Peter F. Pelz, John Friesen
{"title":"配水系统的恢复力指标真的能评估恢复力吗?批判性评论","authors":"Michaela Leštáková,&nbsp;Kevin T. Logan,&nbsp;Imke-Sophie Rehm,&nbsp;Peter F. Pelz,&nbsp;John Friesen","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2023.120820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Having become vital to satisfying basic human needs, water distribution systems (WDSs) are considered critical infrastructure. They are vulnerable to critical events such as extreme weather, natural and man-made disasters, armed conflicts etc. To account for critical events during design and operation of WDSs, the concept of resilience is frequently mentioned. How resilience of WDSs can be assessed using resilience metrics has been the subject of research of many publications. The aim of this paper is to inspect the alignment between a general understanding of resilience in WDSs and the metrics used for their resilience assessment. A novel framework for categorising resilience metrics for WDSs is presented. A literature review of resilience metrics for WDSs is performed and the results are analysed using the developed framework. The results show that the existing resilience metrics are not able to capture resilience in its complexityresilience metrics do not really assess resilience of the WDSs as a whole, but rather focus only on specific functions and properties which can make the WDSs resilient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 120820"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605/pdfft?md5=fbc45776453af53b38b7ffed97c0da9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0043135423012605-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do resilience metrics of water distribution systems really assess resilience? A critical review\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Leštáková,&nbsp;Kevin T. Logan,&nbsp;Imke-Sophie Rehm,&nbsp;Peter F. Pelz,&nbsp;John Friesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2023.120820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Having become vital to satisfying basic human needs, water distribution systems (WDSs) are considered critical infrastructure. They are vulnerable to critical events such as extreme weather, natural and man-made disasters, armed conflicts etc. To account for critical events during design and operation of WDSs, the concept of resilience is frequently mentioned. How resilience of WDSs can be assessed using resilience metrics has been the subject of research of many publications. The aim of this paper is to inspect the alignment between a general understanding of resilience in WDSs and the metrics used for their resilience assessment. A novel framework for categorising resilience metrics for WDSs is presented. A literature review of resilience metrics for WDSs is performed and the results are analysed using the developed framework. The results show that the existing resilience metrics are not able to capture resilience in its complexityresilience metrics do not really assess resilience of the WDSs as a whole, but rather focus only on specific functions and properties which can make the WDSs resilient.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":\"248 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605/pdfft?md5=fbc45776453af53b38b7ffed97c0da9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0043135423012605-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135423012605","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

配水系统对满足人类基本需求至关重要,被视为关键的基础设施。他们很容易受到极端天气、自然灾害和人为灾害、武装冲突等重大事件的影响。为了解释WDS设计和运行期间的重大事件,经常提到韧性的概念。如何使用弹性指标来评估WDS的弹性一直是许多出版物研究的主题。本文的目的是检查对WDS中弹性的一般理解与用于其弹性评估的指标之间的一致性。提出了一种新的WDS弹性度量分类框架。对WDS的弹性指标进行了文献综述,并使用开发的框架对结果进行了分析。结果表明,现有的弹性指标无法在其复杂性中捕捉弹性。弹性指标并没有真正评估WDS的整体弹性,而是只关注能够使WDS具有弹性的特定功能和特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Do resilience metrics of water distribution systems really assess resilience? A critical review

Do resilience metrics of water distribution systems really assess resilience? A critical review

Having become vital to satisfying basic human needs, water distribution systems (WDSs) are considered critical infrastructure. They are vulnerable to critical events such as extreme weather, natural and man-made disasters, armed conflicts etc. To account for critical events during design and operation of WDSs, the concept of resilience is frequently mentioned. How resilience of WDSs can be assessed using resilience metrics has been the subject of research of many publications. The aim of this paper is to inspect the alignment between a general understanding of resilience in WDSs and the metrics used for their resilience assessment. A novel framework for categorising resilience metrics for WDSs is presented. A literature review of resilience metrics for WDSs is performed and the results are analysed using the developed framework. The results show that the existing resilience metrics are not able to capture resilience in its complexityresilience metrics do not really assess resilience of the WDSs as a whole, but rather focus only on specific functions and properties which can make the WDSs resilient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Research
Water Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1307
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include: •Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management; •Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure; •Drinking water treatment and distribution; •Potable and non-potable water reuse; •Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment; •Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions; •Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment; •Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution; •Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation; •Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts; •Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle; •Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信