竞争风险下的多变量联合模型预测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染住院患者的死亡。

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Alexandra Lavalley-Morelle, Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, Simon B. Gressens, Bérénice Souhail, Alexandre Lahens, Agathe Bounhiol, François-Xavier Lescure, France Mentré, Jimmy Mullaert
{"title":"竞争风险下的多变量联合模型预测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染住院患者的死亡。","authors":"Alexandra Lavalley-Morelle,&nbsp;Nathan Peiffer-Smadja,&nbsp;Simon B. Gressens,&nbsp;Bérénice Souhail,&nbsp;Alexandre Lahens,&nbsp;Agathe Bounhiol,&nbsp;François-Xavier Lescure,&nbsp;France Mentré,&nbsp;Jimmy Mullaert","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202300049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several clinical prognostic scores have been proposed and evaluated in hospitalized patients, relying on variables available at admission. However, capturing data collected from the longitudinal follow-up of patients during hospitalization may improve prediction accuracy of a clinical outcome. To answer this question, 327 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized in an academic French hospital between January and July 2020 are included in the analysis. Up to 59 biomarkers were measured from the patient admission to the time to death or discharge from hospital. We consider a joint model with multiple linear or nonlinear mixed-effects models for biomarkers evolution, and a competing risks model involving subdistribution hazard functions for the risks of death and discharge. The links are modeled by shared random effects, and the selection of the biomarkers is mainly based on the significance of the link between the longitudinal and survival parts. Three biomarkers are retained: the blood neutrophil counts, the arterial pH, and the C-reactive protein. The predictive performances of the model are evaluated with the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) for different landmark and horizon times, and compared with those obtained from a baseline model that considers only information available at admission. The joint modeling approach helps to improve predictions when sufficient information is available. For landmark 6 days and horizon of 30 days, we obtain AUC [95% CI] 0.73 [0.65, 0.81] and 0.81 [0.73, 0.89] for the baseline and joint model, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Statistical inference is validated through a simulation study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate joint model under competing risks to predict death of hospitalized patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Lavalley-Morelle,&nbsp;Nathan Peiffer-Smadja,&nbsp;Simon B. Gressens,&nbsp;Bérénice Souhail,&nbsp;Alexandre Lahens,&nbsp;Agathe Bounhiol,&nbsp;François-Xavier Lescure,&nbsp;France Mentré,&nbsp;Jimmy Mullaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bimj.202300049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several clinical prognostic scores have been proposed and evaluated in hospitalized patients, relying on variables available at admission. However, capturing data collected from the longitudinal follow-up of patients during hospitalization may improve prediction accuracy of a clinical outcome. To answer this question, 327 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized in an academic French hospital between January and July 2020 are included in the analysis. Up to 59 biomarkers were measured from the patient admission to the time to death or discharge from hospital. We consider a joint model with multiple linear or nonlinear mixed-effects models for biomarkers evolution, and a competing risks model involving subdistribution hazard functions for the risks of death and discharge. The links are modeled by shared random effects, and the selection of the biomarkers is mainly based on the significance of the link between the longitudinal and survival parts. Three biomarkers are retained: the blood neutrophil counts, the arterial pH, and the C-reactive protein. The predictive performances of the model are evaluated with the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) for different landmark and horizon times, and compared with those obtained from a baseline model that considers only information available at admission. The joint modeling approach helps to improve predictions when sufficient information is available. For landmark 6 days and horizon of 30 days, we obtain AUC [95% CI] 0.73 [0.65, 0.81] and 0.81 [0.73, 0.89] for the baseline and joint model, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Statistical inference is validated through a simulation study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202300049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202300049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间,根据入院时可用的变量,在住院患者中提出并评估了几种临床预后评分。然而,捕捉从住院期间患者的纵向随访中收集的数据可以提高临床结果的预测准确性。为了回答这个问题,分析包括了2020年1月至7月期间在法国一家学术医院住院的327名新冠肺炎患者。从患者入院到死亡或出院,共测量了多达59种生物标志物。我们考虑了一个具有多个线性或非线性混合效应模型的生物标志物进化联合模型,以及一个涉及死亡和出院风险的次分布危险函数的竞争风险模型。这些联系是通过共享的随机效应建模的,生物标志物的选择主要基于纵向和存活部分之间联系的重要性。保留了三种生物标志物:血液中性粒细胞计数、动脉pH值和C反应蛋白。该模型的预测性能是用不同里程碑和地平线时间的曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估的,并与仅考虑入院时可用信息的基线模型获得的预测性能进行比较。当有足够的信息可用时,联合建模方法有助于改进预测。对于里程碑式的6天和30天的时间范围,我们分别获得基线和联合模型的AUC[95%CI]0.73[0.65,0.81]和0.81[0.73,0.89](p=0.04)。通过模拟研究验证了统计推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multivariate joint model under competing risks to predict death of hospitalized patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several clinical prognostic scores have been proposed and evaluated in hospitalized patients, relying on variables available at admission. However, capturing data collected from the longitudinal follow-up of patients during hospitalization may improve prediction accuracy of a clinical outcome. To answer this question, 327 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized in an academic French hospital between January and July 2020 are included in the analysis. Up to 59 biomarkers were measured from the patient admission to the time to death or discharge from hospital. We consider a joint model with multiple linear or nonlinear mixed-effects models for biomarkers evolution, and a competing risks model involving subdistribution hazard functions for the risks of death and discharge. The links are modeled by shared random effects, and the selection of the biomarkers is mainly based on the significance of the link between the longitudinal and survival parts. Three biomarkers are retained: the blood neutrophil counts, the arterial pH, and the C-reactive protein. The predictive performances of the model are evaluated with the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) for different landmark and horizon times, and compared with those obtained from a baseline model that considers only information available at admission. The joint modeling approach helps to improve predictions when sufficient information is available. For landmark 6 days and horizon of 30 days, we obtain AUC [95% CI] 0.73 [0.65, 0.81] and 0.81 [0.73, 0.89] for the baseline and joint model, respectively (p = 0.04). Statistical inference is validated through a simulation study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信