应对死产审计行动的影响:一个成功的故事。

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Manisha Kumar, Manju Puri, Millo Suka, Nupur Chawla, Gagan Preet Kaur, Reena Yadav, Kiran Agrawal, Ratna Biswas
{"title":"应对死产审计行动的影响:一个成功的故事。","authors":"Manisha Kumar, Manju Puri, Millo Suka, Nupur Chawla, Gagan Preet Kaur, Reena Yadav, Kiran Agrawal, Ratna Biswas","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01808-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Study the impact of intra-facility interventions on the modifiable factors causing stillbirths (SB), using point-of-care quality improvement (POCQI) methodology.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Stillbirth data during the 9 months pre-intervention period were reviewed to identify the common preventable causes. Two interventions, namely, ultrasound at 34-36 weeks gestation and intrapartum monitoring on a common customized labor chart for all health-care providers, were done. Post-intervention data were collected to observe the impact of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stillbirth rate reduced from 212/5940 deliveries (35.7/1000) in the pre-intervention period to 165/5993 deliveries (27.7/1000) in the post-intervention period (<i>p</i> = 0.011). The intra-facility failure to identify FGR significantly reduced in the post-intervention group (<i>p</i> = 0.033), leading to 63% (RR 0.37) reduction in its risk. Using a common customized labor chart led to a significant decline in the inadequate monitoring as a provider-related cause of stillbirth (<i>p</i> < 0.001) leading to its 42% decline as contributor to modifiable cause of SB (RR 0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reviewing the perinatal death surveillance response (PDSR) data, identifying gaps in care, and using improvement methodology for instituting corrective measures play an important role in reducing intramural stillbirths.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"73 Suppl 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Action Taken in Response to Stillbirth Audit: A Success Story.\",\"authors\":\"Manisha Kumar, Manju Puri, Millo Suka, Nupur Chawla, Gagan Preet Kaur, Reena Yadav, Kiran Agrawal, Ratna Biswas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-023-01808-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Study the impact of intra-facility interventions on the modifiable factors causing stillbirths (SB), using point-of-care quality improvement (POCQI) methodology.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Stillbirth data during the 9 months pre-intervention period were reviewed to identify the common preventable causes. Two interventions, namely, ultrasound at 34-36 weeks gestation and intrapartum monitoring on a common customized labor chart for all health-care providers, were done. Post-intervention data were collected to observe the impact of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stillbirth rate reduced from 212/5940 deliveries (35.7/1000) in the pre-intervention period to 165/5993 deliveries (27.7/1000) in the post-intervention period (<i>p</i> = 0.011). The intra-facility failure to identify FGR significantly reduced in the post-intervention group (<i>p</i> = 0.033), leading to 63% (RR 0.37) reduction in its risk. Using a common customized labor chart led to a significant decline in the inadequate monitoring as a provider-related cause of stillbirth (<i>p</i> < 0.001) leading to its 42% decline as contributor to modifiable cause of SB (RR 0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reviewing the perinatal death surveillance response (PDSR) data, identifying gaps in care, and using improvement methodology for instituting corrective measures play an important role in reducing intramural stillbirths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"73 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"61-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01808-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01808-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用护理质量改进点(POCQI)方法,研究机构内干预对导致死产(SB)的可改变因素的影响。材料和方法:回顾干预前9个月的死产数据,以确定常见的可预防原因。进行了两项干预措施,即妊娠34-36周时的超声检查和在所有医疗保健提供者的通用定制分娩图上进行产时监测。收集干预后的数据,观察干预措施的影响。结果:死产率从干预前的212/5940次分娩(35.7/1000)降至干预后的165/5593次分娩(27.7/1000)(p = 0.011)。在干预后组中,识别FGR的设施内失败显著减少(p = 0.033),导致其风险降低63%(RR 0.37)。使用常见的定制分娩图表导致作为提供者相关死产原因的监测不足显著下降(p 结论:回顾围产期死亡监测反应(PDSR)数据,找出护理差距,并使用改进方法制定纠正措施,在减少壁内死产方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Action Taken in Response to Stillbirth Audit: A Success Story.

Objectives: Study the impact of intra-facility interventions on the modifiable factors causing stillbirths (SB), using point-of-care quality improvement (POCQI) methodology.

Material and methods: Stillbirth data during the 9 months pre-intervention period were reviewed to identify the common preventable causes. Two interventions, namely, ultrasound at 34-36 weeks gestation and intrapartum monitoring on a common customized labor chart for all health-care providers, were done. Post-intervention data were collected to observe the impact of the interventions.

Results: The stillbirth rate reduced from 212/5940 deliveries (35.7/1000) in the pre-intervention period to 165/5993 deliveries (27.7/1000) in the post-intervention period (p = 0.011). The intra-facility failure to identify FGR significantly reduced in the post-intervention group (p = 0.033), leading to 63% (RR 0.37) reduction in its risk. Using a common customized labor chart led to a significant decline in the inadequate monitoring as a provider-related cause of stillbirth (p < 0.001) leading to its 42% decline as contributor to modifiable cause of SB (RR 0.48).

Conclusion: Reviewing the perinatal death surveillance response (PDSR) data, identifying gaps in care, and using improvement methodology for instituting corrective measures play an important role in reducing intramural stillbirths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信