印度东北部一所非肿瘤学教学机构的盆腔肿块冷冻切片和临床/放射学诊断的准确性。

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Pesona Grace Lucksom, Mingma Sherpa, Barun Kumar Sharma, Deepty Sinha
{"title":"印度东北部一所非肿瘤学教学机构的盆腔肿块冷冻切片和临床/放射学诊断的准确性。","authors":"Pesona Grace Lucksom, Mingma Sherpa, Barun Kumar Sharma, Deepty Sinha","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01766-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frozen section (FS) is an important decision making intraoperative tool in a non-oncology center especially in a region where women are often \"lost to followup\".</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the use of FS in non-oncology setup for ovarian and uterine masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of women who had undergone surgery with frozen section for large abdominopelvic masses at Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim, India, from July 2017 to July 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22 women were taken into study out of which 18 had FS for ovarian masses while 4 had frozen section for large uterine masses. All ovarian masses looked malignant on imaging while only 7 looked malignant intraoperatively. FS detected 8 women (44%) with ovarian malignancy out of which 2 were suspicious. The 2 suspicious cases were benign on final histopathology. FS was negative for malignancy in 10 women (56%) out of which 2 were borderline sero-mucinous on final histopathology. FS for ovarian masses showed sensitivity: 66.7% specificity: 83.3%, NPV: 83.3% and Accuracy of 80% when compared to the final histopathology. Intraoperatively 3 out of 4 uterine masses looked malignant. However, all of the uterine masses were negative on FS and final histopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-oncology centers are burdened with variety of benign surgeries, hence, FS is effective in detecting malignancy in ovarian tumors but not so in large uterine masses. Performing FS prevents \"lost to follow ups\" in ovarian tumors while avoiding it, saves time of experts while dealing with large uterine masses.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"73 Suppl 1","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Frozen Section and Clinical/Radiological Diagnosis with Final Histopathology of Pelvic Masses in a Teaching Institute with a Non-oncology Setup, in Northeast India.\",\"authors\":\"Pesona Grace Lucksom, Mingma Sherpa, Barun Kumar Sharma, Deepty Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-023-01766-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frozen section (FS) is an important decision making intraoperative tool in a non-oncology center especially in a region where women are often \\\"lost to followup\\\".</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the use of FS in non-oncology setup for ovarian and uterine masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of women who had undergone surgery with frozen section for large abdominopelvic masses at Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim, India, from July 2017 to July 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22 women were taken into study out of which 18 had FS for ovarian masses while 4 had frozen section for large uterine masses. All ovarian masses looked malignant on imaging while only 7 looked malignant intraoperatively. FS detected 8 women (44%) with ovarian malignancy out of which 2 were suspicious. The 2 suspicious cases were benign on final histopathology. FS was negative for malignancy in 10 women (56%) out of which 2 were borderline sero-mucinous on final histopathology. FS for ovarian masses showed sensitivity: 66.7% specificity: 83.3%, NPV: 83.3% and Accuracy of 80% when compared to the final histopathology. Intraoperatively 3 out of 4 uterine masses looked malignant. However, all of the uterine masses were negative on FS and final histopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-oncology centers are burdened with variety of benign surgeries, hence, FS is effective in detecting malignancy in ovarian tumors but not so in large uterine masses. Performing FS prevents \\\"lost to follow ups\\\" in ovarian tumors while avoiding it, saves time of experts while dealing with large uterine masses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"73 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"135-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01766-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01766-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冷冻切片(FS)是非肿瘤中心的一种重要的术中决策工具,尤其是在女性经常“随访失败”的地区。目的:评估FS在卵巢和子宫肿块的非肿瘤设置中的应用。方法:回顾性分析2017年7月至2021年7月在印度锡金中央转诊医院接受冷冻切片治疗大面积腹盆腔肿块的女性。结果:22名女性被纳入研究,其中18名女性患有卵巢肿块FS,4名女性患有大面积子宫肿块冷冻切片。所有卵巢肿块在影像学上看起来都是恶性的,而只有7例在手术中看起来是恶性的。FS检测到8名女性(44%)患有卵巢恶性肿瘤,其中2名可疑。2例可疑病例在最终组织病理学检查中为良性。FS对10名女性(56%)的恶性肿瘤呈阴性反应,其中2名在最终组织病理学检查中为交界性血清粘液性。与最终组织病理学相比,卵巢肿块的FS显示出敏感性:66.7%、特异性:83.3%、NPV:83.3%和准确度为80%。术中4个子宫肿块中有3个看起来是恶性的。然而,所有子宫肿块的FS和最终组织病理学检查均为阴性。结论:非肿瘤中心承担着各种良性手术的负担,因此FS对卵巢肿瘤的恶性检测是有效的,但对子宫大肿块的恶性检测则不然。在避免卵巢肿瘤的同时,进行FS可以防止“失访”,在处理大型子宫肿块时节省专家的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Frozen Section and Clinical/Radiological Diagnosis with Final Histopathology of Pelvic Masses in a Teaching Institute with a Non-oncology Setup, in Northeast India.

Background: Frozen section (FS) is an important decision making intraoperative tool in a non-oncology center especially in a region where women are often "lost to followup".

Objectives: Evaluate the use of FS in non-oncology setup for ovarian and uterine masses.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of women who had undergone surgery with frozen section for large abdominopelvic masses at Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim, India, from July 2017 to July 2021.

Results: 22 women were taken into study out of which 18 had FS for ovarian masses while 4 had frozen section for large uterine masses. All ovarian masses looked malignant on imaging while only 7 looked malignant intraoperatively. FS detected 8 women (44%) with ovarian malignancy out of which 2 were suspicious. The 2 suspicious cases were benign on final histopathology. FS was negative for malignancy in 10 women (56%) out of which 2 were borderline sero-mucinous on final histopathology. FS for ovarian masses showed sensitivity: 66.7% specificity: 83.3%, NPV: 83.3% and Accuracy of 80% when compared to the final histopathology. Intraoperatively 3 out of 4 uterine masses looked malignant. However, all of the uterine masses were negative on FS and final histopathology.

Conclusion: Non-oncology centers are burdened with variety of benign surgeries, hence, FS is effective in detecting malignancy in ovarian tumors but not so in large uterine masses. Performing FS prevents "lost to follow ups" in ovarian tumors while avoiding it, saves time of experts while dealing with large uterine masses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信