米索前列醇和米非司酮与单独米索前列终止妊娠中期的随机对照研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ajit Kumar Nayak, Swetalin Mishra, Subhasri Mishra, Ranjita Patnaik, Ipsita Mohapatra
{"title":"米索前列醇和米非司酮与单独米索前列终止妊娠中期的随机对照研究。","authors":"Ajit Kumar Nayak, Swetalin Mishra, Subhasri Mishra, Ranjita Patnaik, Ipsita Mohapatra","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01800-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was done to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol combination versus misoprostol alone for second trimester termination of pregnancy in relation to induction abortion interval, average amount of misoprostol required in each group, success rate and side effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomised control study was conducted on 100 women admitted in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, S.C.B. Medical College & Hospital, Cuttack, for second trimester termination of pregnancy, divided into two groups, Group A and Group B of 50 patients each. Group A patients received 200 mg of oral mifepristone followed by 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol after 48 h, and then 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to a maximum of 6 doses. Group B patients received 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to maximum 6 doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete abortion was seen in 92% and 72% cases in Group A and Group B, respectively. Mean induction abortion interval was 11.59 ± 2.71 h in Group A and 15.57 ± 2.27 h in Group B (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). The average dose of misoprostol required was less in combination regimen, i.e. 1128 ± 384 mcg compared to 1680 ± 302 mcg in misoprostol alone group (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). Side effects like nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were less in combination regimen than misoprostol alone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mifepristone and misoprostol combination is more effective and safer alternative than misoprostol alone in second trimester termination of pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"73 5","pages":"428-433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised Control Study of Misoprostol and Mifepristone versus Misoprostol Alone in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Ajit Kumar Nayak, Swetalin Mishra, Subhasri Mishra, Ranjita Patnaik, Ipsita Mohapatra\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-023-01800-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was done to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol combination versus misoprostol alone for second trimester termination of pregnancy in relation to induction abortion interval, average amount of misoprostol required in each group, success rate and side effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomised control study was conducted on 100 women admitted in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, S.C.B. Medical College & Hospital, Cuttack, for second trimester termination of pregnancy, divided into two groups, Group A and Group B of 50 patients each. Group A patients received 200 mg of oral mifepristone followed by 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol after 48 h, and then 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to a maximum of 6 doses. Group B patients received 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to maximum 6 doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete abortion was seen in 92% and 72% cases in Group A and Group B, respectively. Mean induction abortion interval was 11.59 ± 2.71 h in Group A and 15.57 ± 2.27 h in Group B (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). The average dose of misoprostol required was less in combination regimen, i.e. 1128 ± 384 mcg compared to 1680 ± 302 mcg in misoprostol alone group (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). Side effects like nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were less in combination regimen than misoprostol alone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mifepristone and misoprostol combination is more effective and safer alternative than misoprostol alone in second trimester termination of pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"428-433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01800-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01800-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究旨在评估和比较米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用药与单独使用米索前列治疗中期终止妊娠的有效性和安全性,包括引产间隔、各组平均所需米索前前列醇量、成功率和副作用。材料和方法:这项随机对照研究对100名因妊娠中期终止妊娠而入住卡塔克S.C.B.医学院和医院妇产科的女性进行,分为A组和B组,每组50名患者。A组患者在48小时后接受200mg口服米非司酮,然后接受400mg阴道米索前列醇,然后每3小时接受400mcg阴道米索前列醇,直到完全排出或最多6剂。B组患者每3小时接受400 mcg阴道米索前列醇,直到完全排出或最多6剂。结果:A组和B组完全流产率分别为92%和72%。平均人工流产间隔为11.59 ± A组2.71 h,15.57 ± B组2.27 h(p值 p值 结论:米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用药是一种比单独使用米索前列更有效、更安全的中期终止妊娠方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomised Control Study of Misoprostol and Mifepristone versus Misoprostol Alone in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy.

Introduction: This study was done to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol combination versus misoprostol alone for second trimester termination of pregnancy in relation to induction abortion interval, average amount of misoprostol required in each group, success rate and side effects.

Materials and methods: This randomised control study was conducted on 100 women admitted in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, S.C.B. Medical College & Hospital, Cuttack, for second trimester termination of pregnancy, divided into two groups, Group A and Group B of 50 patients each. Group A patients received 200 mg of oral mifepristone followed by 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol after 48 h, and then 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to a maximum of 6 doses. Group B patients received 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 hourly until complete expulsion or up to maximum 6 doses.

Results: Complete abortion was seen in 92% and 72% cases in Group A and Group B, respectively. Mean induction abortion interval was 11.59 ± 2.71 h in Group A and 15.57 ± 2.27 h in Group B (p value < 0.001). The average dose of misoprostol required was less in combination regimen, i.e. 1128 ± 384 mcg compared to 1680 ± 302 mcg in misoprostol alone group (p value < 0.001). Side effects like nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were less in combination regimen than misoprostol alone group.

Conclusion: Mifepristone and misoprostol combination is more effective and safer alternative than misoprostol alone in second trimester termination of pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信