在弱视的遮挡治疗中测量近视力有价值吗?

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Strabismus Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1080/09273972.2023.2271088
Mahira Y Daly, Charlotte J Codina, Gemma E Arblaster
{"title":"在弱视的遮挡治疗中测量近视力有价值吗?","authors":"Mahira Y Daly, Charlotte J Codina, Gemma E Arblaster","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2023.2271088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>: The purpose of this study was to investigate near and distance visual acuity (VA) prior to, during and on completion of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. <i>Method</i>: Fifty-four patients aged 4-7 years (mean 4.9; ±0.44) with untreated strabismic, anisometropic or mixed amblyopia were recruited to the study following refractive adaptation where applicable. All patients underwent conventional occlusion (patching). Uniocular near and distance VA was tested using age and ability appropriate Crowded LogMAR VA tests prior to, during and upon conclusion of occlusion therapy. <i>Results</i>: In amblyopic eyes, there was no significant difference between near and distance VA prior to occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (<i>p</i> = .66; mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.6 LogMAR; mean near VA at 40 cm = 0.58 LogMAR), or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Picture test (<i>p</i> = .78, mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.44 LogMAR; mean near VA at 33 cm = 0.46 LogMAR;). No significant difference was found between near and distance VA at any visit during occlusion therapy, or on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (<i>p</i> = .86, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.266 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 40 cm = 0.25 LogMAR) or LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures (<i>p</i> = .74, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.16 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 33 cm = 0.16 LogMAR). There was no significant difference in the VA of the fellow (non-amblyopic) eyes prior to and on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) (<i>p</i> = .05, <i>p</i> = .40 respectively); or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures at distance (3 m) or near (33 cm) (<i>p</i> = .89, <i>p</i> = .35 respectively). <i>Discussion</i>: Improvement in VA of amblyopic eyes did not significantly differ between near and distance testing proximites at any point during the course of occlusion therapy for amblyopia in our study. These findings may aid clinicians with appropriate test selection and help with clinical time pressures. Where patient concentration does not allow for uniocular distance vision, uniocular near vision may be used to diagnose amblyopia, and vice versa. This could prevent delay in the treatment of amblyopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"237-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there value in measuring near visual acuity during occlusion therapy for amblyopia?\",\"authors\":\"Mahira Y Daly, Charlotte J Codina, Gemma E Arblaster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273972.2023.2271088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>: The purpose of this study was to investigate near and distance visual acuity (VA) prior to, during and on completion of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. <i>Method</i>: Fifty-four patients aged 4-7 years (mean 4.9; ±0.44) with untreated strabismic, anisometropic or mixed amblyopia were recruited to the study following refractive adaptation where applicable. All patients underwent conventional occlusion (patching). Uniocular near and distance VA was tested using age and ability appropriate Crowded LogMAR VA tests prior to, during and upon conclusion of occlusion therapy. <i>Results</i>: In amblyopic eyes, there was no significant difference between near and distance VA prior to occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (<i>p</i> = .66; mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.6 LogMAR; mean near VA at 40 cm = 0.58 LogMAR), or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Picture test (<i>p</i> = .78, mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.44 LogMAR; mean near VA at 33 cm = 0.46 LogMAR;). No significant difference was found between near and distance VA at any visit during occlusion therapy, or on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (<i>p</i> = .86, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.266 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 40 cm = 0.25 LogMAR) or LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures (<i>p</i> = .74, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.16 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 33 cm = 0.16 LogMAR). There was no significant difference in the VA of the fellow (non-amblyopic) eyes prior to and on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) (<i>p</i> = .05, <i>p</i> = .40 respectively); or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures at distance (3 m) or near (33 cm) (<i>p</i> = .89, <i>p</i> = .35 respectively). <i>Discussion</i>: Improvement in VA of amblyopic eyes did not significantly differ between near and distance testing proximites at any point during the course of occlusion therapy for amblyopia in our study. These findings may aid clinicians with appropriate test selection and help with clinical time pressures. Where patient concentration does not allow for uniocular distance vision, uniocular near vision may be used to diagnose amblyopia, and vice versa. This could prevent delay in the treatment of amblyopia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strabismus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"237-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strabismus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2023.2271088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2023.2271088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究的目的是调查弱视遮挡治疗前、治疗过程中和完成后的近距离视力(VA)。方法:54名4-7岁的患者 年龄(平均4.9;±0.44)的未经治疗的斜视、屈光参差或混合性弱视患者在屈光适应后(如适用)被纳入研究。所有患者均接受了常规封堵(修补)。在闭塞治疗之前、期间和结束时,使用适合年龄和能力的Crowd-LogMAR VA测试来测试单眼近距离VA。结果:在弱视眼中,LogMAR群组闭塞治疗前的近距离VA和远距离VA之间没有显著差异(p = .66;3时的平均距离VA m = 0.6 LogMAR;40时VA附近的平均值 厘米 = 0.58 LogMAR),或使用LogMAR拥挤Kay图片测试(p = .78,3时的平均距离VA m = 0.44 LogMAR;33时VA附近的平均值 厘米 = 0.46 LogMAR;)。在闭塞治疗期间或LogMAR拥挤闭塞治疗完成时的任何访视中,近距离和远距离VA之间均未发现显著差异(p = .86,3时的平均最终距离VA m = 0.266 LogMAR;40时VA附近的最终平均值 厘米 = 0.25 LogMAR)或LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures(p = .74,3时的平均最终距离VA m = 0.16 LogMAR;33时VA附近的最终平均值 厘米 = 0.16 LogMAR)。在LogMAR远距离拥挤的闭塞治疗前后,其他(非弱视)眼睛的VA没有显著差异(3 m) 或接近(40 厘米)(p = .05,p = .分别为40);或与LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures保持距离(3 m) 或附近(33 厘米)(p = .89,p = .分别为35)。讨论:在我们的研究中,在弱视的遮挡治疗过程中,近距离和远距离测试在任何时候对弱视眼VA的改善都没有显著差异。这些发现可能有助于临床医生选择合适的测试,并有助于缓解临床时间压力。如果患者注意力不集中,无法进行单眼远视,单眼近视可用于诊断弱视,反之亦然。这可以防止弱视治疗的延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is there value in measuring near visual acuity during occlusion therapy for amblyopia?

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate near and distance visual acuity (VA) prior to, during and on completion of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Method: Fifty-four patients aged 4-7 years (mean 4.9; ±0.44) with untreated strabismic, anisometropic or mixed amblyopia were recruited to the study following refractive adaptation where applicable. All patients underwent conventional occlusion (patching). Uniocular near and distance VA was tested using age and ability appropriate Crowded LogMAR VA tests prior to, during and upon conclusion of occlusion therapy. Results: In amblyopic eyes, there was no significant difference between near and distance VA prior to occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (p = .66; mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.6 LogMAR; mean near VA at 40 cm = 0.58 LogMAR), or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Picture test (p = .78, mean distance VA at 3 m = 0.44 LogMAR; mean near VA at 33 cm = 0.46 LogMAR;). No significant difference was found between near and distance VA at any visit during occlusion therapy, or on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded (p = .86, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.266 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 40 cm = 0.25 LogMAR) or LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures (p = .74, mean final distance VA at 3 m = 0.16 LogMAR; mean final near VA at 33 cm = 0.16 LogMAR). There was no significant difference in the VA of the fellow (non-amblyopic) eyes prior to and on completion of occlusion therapy with LogMAR Crowded at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) (p = .05, p = .40 respectively); or with LogMAR Crowded Kay Pictures at distance (3 m) or near (33 cm) (p = .89, p = .35 respectively). Discussion: Improvement in VA of amblyopic eyes did not significantly differ between near and distance testing proximites at any point during the course of occlusion therapy for amblyopia in our study. These findings may aid clinicians with appropriate test selection and help with clinical time pressures. Where patient concentration does not allow for uniocular distance vision, uniocular near vision may be used to diagnose amblyopia, and vice versa. This could prevent delay in the treatment of amblyopia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信