河边农村人口的食品消费概况。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI:10.22605/RRH7730
Ana Carolina da Silva Medeiros, Evelyne Marie Therese Mainbourg
{"title":"河边农村人口的食品消费概况。","authors":"Ana Carolina da Silva Medeiros, Evelyne Marie Therese Mainbourg","doi":"10.22605/RRH7730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The uniqueness of the way of life of rural riverside populations is of interest because they are the largest traditional Amazonian population. Their eating habits reveal their life conditions and relationship with the urban environment and is a poorly investigated subject. This research aimed to describe and analyze the food consumption of Amazonian riverside populations based on the food types consumed and reported by the families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out on the rural riverside population occupying part of the riverbank of Rio Negro, in Manaus County, North Brazil. This population can only be accessed by river. Random, systematic, stratified sampling was conducted on 287 households. A questionnaire about consumed food, socioeconomic conditions and food obtainment was applied. The analysis was performed in R software. Descriptive statistical analysis and log-binomial regression were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was observed that eating habits were mainly based on in natura (unprocessed) or minimally processed foods, according to the food classification system NOVA. Food diversity was low and the most consumed food types were coffee, flour and rice. The influence of small local markets, income and traditional practices on food intake based on food processing level was also observed. Thus, the chances of eating fish in locations with a small grocery shop were lower (p=0.009) and of eating chicken were higher (p&le;0.001). The chances of consuming in natura or minimally processed foods among the literate population (p=0.041) with higher income (p&le;0.001) were higher. The chances of eating processed foods were lower where fishing (p=0.007) and farming (p=0.009) were practiced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these unexpected results, the present research highlights the food consumption of a riverside population and reduces the shortage of information about the largest traditional Amazonian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"7730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food consumption profile of rural riverside populations.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Carolina da Silva Medeiros, Evelyne Marie Therese Mainbourg\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH7730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The uniqueness of the way of life of rural riverside populations is of interest because they are the largest traditional Amazonian population. Their eating habits reveal their life conditions and relationship with the urban environment and is a poorly investigated subject. This research aimed to describe and analyze the food consumption of Amazonian riverside populations based on the food types consumed and reported by the families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out on the rural riverside population occupying part of the riverbank of Rio Negro, in Manaus County, North Brazil. This population can only be accessed by river. Random, systematic, stratified sampling was conducted on 287 households. A questionnaire about consumed food, socioeconomic conditions and food obtainment was applied. The analysis was performed in R software. Descriptive statistical analysis and log-binomial regression were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was observed that eating habits were mainly based on in natura (unprocessed) or minimally processed foods, according to the food classification system NOVA. Food diversity was low and the most consumed food types were coffee, flour and rice. The influence of small local markets, income and traditional practices on food intake based on food processing level was also observed. Thus, the chances of eating fish in locations with a small grocery shop were lower (p=0.009) and of eating chicken were higher (p&le;0.001). The chances of consuming in natura or minimally processed foods among the literate population (p=0.041) with higher income (p&le;0.001) were higher. The chances of eating processed foods were lower where fishing (p=0.007) and farming (p=0.009) were practiced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these unexpected results, the present research highlights the food consumption of a riverside population and reduces the shortage of information about the largest traditional Amazonian population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"7730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7730\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:河边农村人口的独特生活方式令人感兴趣,因为他们是亚马逊最大的传统人口。他们的饮食习惯揭示了他们的生活条件以及与城市环境的关系,这是一个研究较少的主题。本研究旨在根据家庭消费和报告的食物类型,描述和分析亚马逊河畔人口的食物消费。方法:对巴西北部马瑙斯县Rio Negro部分河岸的农村河岸人口进行横断面研究。这些人口只能通过河流进入。对287户家庭进行了随机、系统、分层抽样。采用了一份关于食物消费、社会经济条件和食物获取的问卷。在R软件中进行分析。进行描述性统计分析和对数二项回归。结果:根据食品分类系统NOVA,观察到饮食习惯主要基于天然(未加工)或最低限度加工的食品。食物多样性低,消费最多的食物类型是咖啡、面粉和大米。还观察到当地小型市场、收入和传统做法对基于食品加工水平的食品摄入量的影响。因此,在有小杂货店的地方吃鱼的几率较低(p=0.009),吃鸡肉的几率较高(p&le;0.001)。在收入较高的识字人群(p=0.041)中,食用天然或最低加工食品的几率较高。在捕鱼(p=0.007)和务农(p=0.009)的地方,食用加工食品的几率较低。结论:基于这些出乎意料的结果,本研究突出了河边人口的食物消费,并减少了关于最大的传统亚马逊人口的信息短缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food consumption profile of rural riverside populations.

Introduction: The uniqueness of the way of life of rural riverside populations is of interest because they are the largest traditional Amazonian population. Their eating habits reveal their life conditions and relationship with the urban environment and is a poorly investigated subject. This research aimed to describe and analyze the food consumption of Amazonian riverside populations based on the food types consumed and reported by the families.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on the rural riverside population occupying part of the riverbank of Rio Negro, in Manaus County, North Brazil. This population can only be accessed by river. Random, systematic, stratified sampling was conducted on 287 households. A questionnaire about consumed food, socioeconomic conditions and food obtainment was applied. The analysis was performed in R software. Descriptive statistical analysis and log-binomial regression were carried out.

Results: It was observed that eating habits were mainly based on in natura (unprocessed) or minimally processed foods, according to the food classification system NOVA. Food diversity was low and the most consumed food types were coffee, flour and rice. The influence of small local markets, income and traditional practices on food intake based on food processing level was also observed. Thus, the chances of eating fish in locations with a small grocery shop were lower (p=0.009) and of eating chicken were higher (p≤0.001). The chances of consuming in natura or minimally processed foods among the literate population (p=0.041) with higher income (p≤0.001) were higher. The chances of eating processed foods were lower where fishing (p=0.007) and farming (p=0.009) were practiced.

Conclusion: Based on these unexpected results, the present research highlights the food consumption of a riverside population and reduces the shortage of information about the largest traditional Amazonian population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信